Meditative thinking and heideggerian response to humanity’s forgetfulness of being
Authors
-
Resty Ruel Ventura Borjal
restyvborjal@clsu.edu.ph
College of Arts and Social Sciences, Central Luzon State University, Nueva Ecija, Philippineshttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6843-5586
DOI:
10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.15.1.3117.2025Keywords:
environment; existential challenges; forgetfulness of being; Martin Heidegger; meditative thinkingAbstract
Human beings today are facing existential challenges precisely because the human person has forgotten to be with oneself. Humanity has challenged entities and failed to let others be in a meaningful way. Humanity has neglected to cultivate the correct relationship with the world around us and has been trapped in the many ordinary affairs, which amounts to the “forgetfulness of Being.” This paper emphasizes the existential challenges brought about by technological modernity. It will also look at the dangers, saving power, and impacts of technology on the environment within the thinking presented to us by Martin Heidegger. This paper employs the interpretive method. It determines and identifies the vital insights which are significant to the issues and concerns of the study. Also, other sources were associated with the literature in seeking to answer some questions regarding the challenges brought about by modern. This study argues in favor of the need to reflect on humanity’s appropriate attitude toward technology toward a mode of releasement that could lead to a way out from the existential crisis. This paper endorses Heidegger as an environmental thinker. Furthermore, this paper suggests engaging critically with Heidegger’s philosophy of technology and presents a kind of thinking that could be a way out from the rule of machination. Scientific thinking is calculative thinking, a kind of thinking where everything is reduced into quantification. For Heidegger, it is crucial to keep meditative thinking alive, for it brings about a world in which one feels at home.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.References
DeLaFuente, C. (2013). Our place in nature: Toward a heideggerian ethos of the environment [Masters thesis, Texas A & M University]. https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/151212
Ellul, J. (1967). The technological society. Vintage.
Feenberg, A. (1999). Questioning technology. Routledge.
Feenberg, A. (2002). Transforming technology: A critical theory revisited. Oxford University Press.
Glendinning, C. (1990). Notes toward a neo-luddite manifesto. https://theanarchistlibrary.org/ library/chellis-glendinning-notes-toward-a-neo-luddite-manifesto
Grant, G. (1969). Technology and empire. Anansi.
Heidegger, M. (1966a). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). Harper Perennial.
Heidegger, M. (1966b). Memorial address in discourse on Thinking: A translation of gelassenheit (J. M. Anderson & E. H. Freund, Trans.). Harper and Row Publishers.
Heidegger, M. (1971). The thing: In poetry, language, thought (A. Hofstadter, Trans.). Harper & Row.
Heidegger, M. (1975). Building dwelling thinking: In poetry language thought. Harper Collins Publishers.
Heidegger, M. (1977a). The question concerning technology: In basic writings: From being and time (1927) to the task of thinking (1964). Harper & Row.
Heidegger, M. (1977b). The question concerning technology in the question concerning technology and other essays (W. Lovitt, Trans.). Garland Publishing.
Heidegger, M. (1977c). Science and reflection: In the question concerning technology and other essays (W. Lovitt, Trans.). Harper Perennial.
Heidegger, M. (1993a). Letter on humanism in basic writings. E HarperCollins Publishers.
Heidegger, M. (1993b). Building, dwelling, thinking: In basic writings. Harper Collins Publishers.
Heidegger, M. (2004). Question concerning technology. Reprinted in the philosophy of technology. Rowman and Littlefield.
Heidegger, M. (2008). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). Harper Perennial.
Heidegger, M. (2010). What is metaphysics in basic writings. Routledge.
Kelly, K. (2009). 4 arguments against technology. https://hbr.org/2009/04/4-arguments-against-technology
Lack, A. (2014). Martin heidegger on technology, ecology, and the arts. Palgrave Macmillan.
Maboloc, C. R. M. (2021). The question of transdisciplinarity between critical thought and modern technology. In Integrated science: Science without borders (pp. 321-333). Springer.
Marcuse, H. (1941). Some social implications of modern technology. Studies in Philosophy and Social Science, 9(3), 414-439.
Marcuse, H. (1964). One dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Beacon Press.
Sale, K. (1995). Lessons from literature: Setting limits on technology. The Nation, 260(22), 785-788.
Watson, S. (2016). Toward a constructive technology criticism. https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/D86401Z7
Downloads
Received: 06-12-2023Accepted: 02-02-2024Published: 04-06-2024Statistics Views
Abstract: 563 PDF: 1392How to Cite
Borjal, R. R. V. (2024). Meditative thinking and heideggerian response to humanity’s forgetfulness of being. HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - SOCIAL SCIENCES, 15(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.15.1.3117.2025License
Copyright (c) 2024 Resty Ruel Ventura Borjal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
