Integrating multiscale features for robust breast cancer histopathology image classification

Authors

  • Aziz Ur Rehman
    Islamia College University, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Naveed Khan
    Islamia College University, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Gul E Arzu
    Sejong University, Seoul, Korea, Republic of
  • L. Minh Dang
    Sejong University, Seoul, Korea, Republic of

DOI:

10.46223/HCMCOUJS.tech.en.16.1.4577.2026

Keywords:

breast cancer; histopathology images; invasive carcinoma; in situ carcinoma; multiclass classification; stain normalization

Abstract

Breast cancer is a prominent contributor to cancer-related fatalities among women globally, and early detection via histopathological examination, despite being regarded as the benchmark method, is frequently time-consuming and prone to subjectivity. To overcome these challenges, we introduce an automated deep learning framework that categorizes Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E)-stained breast tissue samples into four groups: normal tissue, benign lesions, localized malignant tumors, and invasive carcinoma. Our system utilizes intermediate feature embeddings from the Xception (Extreme Inception) architecture to derive discriminative features, attaining 98% precision, a 0.969 kappa metric, and exceptional AUC-ROC 0.998 and AUC-PR 0.995 values on the raw (non-normalized) dataset, with heightened detection rates for localized malignant tumors 96% and invasive carcinoma, 99%. We also assessed four stain standardization methods (Reinhard, Ruifrok, Macenko, and Vahadane) and found that Macenko normalization yielded the strongest results: 97.79% accuracy, kappa = 0.965, AUC-ROC = 0.997, AUC-PR = 0.991. However, unprocessed images still outperformed all normalized versions. A comparative study revealed that our method exceeds baseline AlexNet and state-of-the-art deep learning architectures (VGG16, VGG19, Inception-v3, and conventional Xception), highlighting its capability to improve diagnostic reliability while confirming that stain normalization, though viable, does not surpass the effectiveness of the unaltered dataset.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abhisheka, B., Biswas, S. K., & Purkayastha, B. (2023). A comprehensive review on breast cancer detection, classification, and segmentation using deep learning. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 30(8), 5023-5052.

Afrin, H., Larson, N. B., Fatemi, M., & Alizad, A. (2023). Deep learning in different ultrasound methods for breast cancer, from diagnosis to prognosis: Current trends, challenges, and an analysis. Cancers, 15(12), Article 3139.

Al Husaini, M. A. S., Habaebi, M. H., Gunawan, T. S., Islam, M. R., & Hameed, S. A. (2021). Automatic breast cancer detection using inception V3 in thermography. 8th International Conference on Computer and Communication Engineering (ICCCE).

Alanazi, S. A., Kamruzzaman, M., Islam Sarker, M. N., Alruwaili, M., Alhwaiti, Y., Alshammari, N., & Siddiqi, M. H. (2021). Boosting breast cancer detection using convolutional neural network. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2021(1), Article 5528622.

Bejnordi, B. E., Veta, M., Van Diest, P. J., Van Ginneken, B., Karssemeijer, N., Litjens, G., Van Der Laak, J. A., Hermsen, M., Manson, Q. F., & Balkenhol, M. (2017). Diagnostic assessment of deep learning algorithms for detection of lymph node metastases in women with breast cancer. Jama, 318(22), 2199-2210.

Downloads

Received: 09-07-2025
Accepted: 28-08-2025
Published: 07-09-2025

Statistics Views

Abstract: 194
PDF: 29

How to Cite

Rehman, A. U., Khan, N., Arzu, G. E., & Dang, L. M. (2025). Integrating multiscale features for robust breast cancer histopathology image classification. HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 16(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.tech.en.16.1.4577.2026