Assessing the adoption and impact of construction automation technologies on project management efficiency: A case study of Cebu City
Authors
-
April D. Ortiz
Cebu Technological University, Cebu City, Philippines
-
Jiomarie Balaquit Jesus
jiomarie.jesus@mandauecitycollege.com
Mandaue City College, Mandaue City, Philippineshttps://orcid.org/0009-0000-9818-2962
- Nasvin Del Rosario
University of the Philippines Cebu, Cebu City, Philippines- Geraldine Sambrana
University of Cebu, Cebu City, Philippines- Danilo Y. Patalinghug
Cebu Technological University, Cebu City, PhilippinesDOI:
10.46223/HCMCOUJS.tech.en.16.1.4344.2026Keywords:
automation adoption; building information modeling; construction automation; digital transformation; project management efficiencyAbstract
This study rigorously assessed the adoption and impact of construction automation technologies on project management efficiency within the urban infrastructure context of Cebu City, Philippines. Grounded in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), the research examined the influence of three key constructs; Perceived Usefulness (PU), Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU), and Behavioral Intention to Use (BIU) on the integration of automation technologies, including Building Information Modeling (BIM), Artificial Intelligence (AI), and the Internet of Things (IoT). Utilizing a quantitative-descriptive and correlational design, data were collected from 40 purposively selected construction professionals through validated survey instruments. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation, and internal consistency testing via Cronbach’s Alpha. The findings revealed that only PEOU exhibited a statistically significant relationship with the level of influence of automation adoption. At the same time, PU and BIU did not demonstrate significant associations with project management efficiency or procedural effectiveness. This outcome suggests that external structural barriers, such as regulatory gaps, limited financial capacity, and inadequate workforce readiness, remain significant impediments to the implementation of automation. Despite favorable perceptions of automation’s utility in enhancing coordination, cost estimation, and real-time monitoring, actual usage remained suboptimal. The study concluded that construction automation can substantially contribute to improved project management efficiency if institutionalized through policy incentives, standardized digital frameworks, and comprehensive workforce upskilling programs. These findings offered critical implications for stakeholders seeking to accelerate digital transformation in the Philippine construction sector. They proposed directions for future research focused on automation, scalability, and BIM compliance enforcement across varying firm sizes.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.References
Abdel-Hamid, M., & Abdelhaleem, H. M. (2023). Project cost control using five dimensions building information modelling. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(3), 405-409.
Abdulwahhab, R., Naimi, S., & Abdullah, R. (2022). Managing cost and schedule evaluation of a construction project via BIM technology and experts’ points of view. Mathematical Modelling of Engineering Problems, 9(6), 1515-1522.
Ahmed, R., Philbin, S. P., & Cheema, F. E. A. (2021). Systematic literature review of project manager’s leadership competencies. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28(1), 1-30.
Alabi, A. A., Mustapha, S. D., & Akinade, A. O. (2025). Leveraging advanced technologies for efficient project management in telecommunications. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 17, Article 49.
Al-Okaily, A., Teoh, A. P., & Al-Okaily, M. (2023). Evaluation of data analytics-oriented business intelligence technology effectiveness: An enterprise-level analysis. Business Process Management Journal, 29(3), 777-800.
Bickel, E. (2024). Why technology adoption is slow in construction (and how to overcome it). The Drone Life. https://thedronelifenj.com/technology-adoption-construction/
Bist, A., Pant, B., Ojha, G. P., Acharya, J., Park, M., & Saud, P. S. (2023). Novel materials in perovskite solar cells: Efficiency, stability, and future perspectives. Nanomaterials, 13(11), Article 1724.
Civils.ai. (2024). AI in construction certification. https://civils.ai/ai-in-construction-training-course
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Dusty Robotics. (2023). What are the barriers to adopting robotics in construction? https://www.dustyrobotics.com/articles/what-are-the-barriers-to-adopting-robotics-in-construction
Elhajjar, S., Yacoub, L., & Yaacoub, H. (2023). Automation in business research: Systematic literature review. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 21(3), 675-698.
Ferreira, B., & Reis, J. (2023). A systematic literature review on the application of automation in logistics. Logistics, 7(4), Article 80.
Fridkin, S., Greenstein, G., Cohen, A., & Damari, A. (2024). Perceived usefulness of a mandatory information system. Applied Sciences, 14(16), Article 7413.
Guo, K., & Zhang, L. (2022). Multi-objective optimization for improved project management: Current status and future directions. Automation in Construction, 139, Article 104256.
Hocking, L., Parkinson, S., Adams, A., Nielsen, E. M., Ang, C., & de Carvalho Gomes, H. (2023). Overcoming the challenges of using automated technologies for public health evidence synthesis. Eurosurveillance, 28(45), Article 2300183. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.45.2300183
Huang, Z., Mao, C., Wang, J., & Sadick, A. M. (2022). Understanding the key takeaway of construction robots towards construction automation. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(9), 3664-3688.
International Association for Automation and Robotics in Construction (IAARC). (2024). Advancing automation and robotics in construction. https://www.iaarc.org/
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2018). ISO 19650-1:2018: Organization and digitization of information about buildings and civil engineering works, including Building Information Modelling (BIM)-Information management using building information modelling-Part 1: Concepts and principles. https://www.iso.org/standard/68078.htm
International Society of Automation (ISA). (2025). Certified Automation Professional (CAP) certification. https://www.isa.org/certification/cap
Jain, R., Jain, A., Mauro, E., LeShane, K., & Densmore, D. (2023). ICOR: Improving codon optimization with recurrent neural networks. BMC Bioinformatics, 24(1), Article 132.
JCV & Associates. (2023). How AI and automation are changing the construction industry. https://www.jcvassociates.ph/post/how-ai-and-automation-are-changing-the-construction-industry
Jesus, J., Zoilo, J., Alsola, M., Cortez-Roncales, M., Bontes, J., & Pogado, M. (2025). Management accounting’s effect on organizational performance: The dynamics of strategic decision making. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 41(9), 1051-1059. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.410907
Junior, C. F. M., Biotto, C. N., & Serra, S. M. B. (2024). The integration of construction planning and budget using Building Information Modelling (BIM): A systematic literature review. Caderno Pedagógico, 21(4), e3611-e3611.
Kassen, M. (2022). Blockchain and e-government innovation: Automation of public information processes. Information Systems, 103, Article 101862.
Kaufmann, C., & Kock, A. (2022). Does project management matter? The relationship between project management effort, complexity, and profitability. International Journal of Project Management, 40(6), 624-633.
Klarin, A., & Xiao, Q. (2024). Automation in architecture, engineering and construction: A scientometric analysis and implications for management. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(8), 3308-3334.
Klein, G., & Müller, R. (2020). Literature review expectations of project management journal. Project Management Journal, 51(3), 239-241. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972820916340
Klein, L. L., de Pádua, S. I. D., Gera, R., Vieira, K. M., & Dorion, E. C. H. (2023). Business process management effectiveness and maturity through lean management practices: The Brazilian federal police experience. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 14(2), 368-396.
Korkmaz, O. (2020). A literature review on project success: Defining and evaluating key factors. Project Management Review, 45(4), 67-89.
Luo, J., Ahmad, S. F., Alyaemeni, A., Ou, Y., Irshad, M., Alyafi-Alzahri, R., Alsanie, G., & Unnisa, S. T. (2024). Role of perceived ease of use, usefulness, and financial strength on the adoption of health information systems: The moderating role of hospital size. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-12.
Mailizar, M., Burg, D., & Maulina, S. (2021). Examining university students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning during the Covid-19 pandemic: An extended TAM model. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7057-7077.
Mardiana, S., Tjakraatmadja, J. H., & Aprianingsih, A. (2015). Validating the conceptual model for predicting intention to use as part of information system success model: The case of an Indonesian government agency. Procedia Computer Science, 72, 353-360.
Marikyan, D., & Papagiannidis, S. (2024). Technology acceptance model: A review. TheoryHub Book.
Mayulu, H., & Tricahyadinata, I. (2024). Accreditation automation system to improve the quality of education. INOVASI: Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan, dan Manajemen, 20(4), 807-813.
National Center for Construction Education & Research (NCCER). (2023). The learning & development leader for the construction industry. https://www.nccer.org/
Noteboom, C., Ofori, M., Sutrave, K., & El-Gayar, O. (2021). Agile project management: A systematic literature review of adoption drivers and critical success factors. Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 6775-6784.
Nuseir, M. T., Aljumah, A. I., & El Refae, G. A. (2022). Trust in adoption of internet of things: Role of perceived ease of use and security. In 2022 International Arab Conference on Information Technology (ACIT) (pp. 1-7). IEEE.
Oklahoma State University Institute of Technology (OSUIT). (2025). ABET accreditation: School of engineering & construction technologies. https://osuit.edu/academics/school-engineering-construction-technologies/abet.html
Orel, E., Ciglenecki, I., Thiabaud, A., Temerev, A., Calmy, A., Keiser, O., & Merzouki, A. (2023). An automated literature review tool (LiteRev) for streamlining and accelerating research using natural language processing and machine learning: Descriptive performance evaluation study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e39736. https://doi.org/10.2196/39736
Patel, S. M., Kang, Y. M., Im, K., Neuen, B. L., Anker, S. D., Bhatt, D. L., Butler, J., Cherney, D. Z. I., Claggett, B. L., Fletcher, R. A., Herrington, W. G., Inzucchi, S. E., Jardine, M. J., Mahaffey, K. W., McGuire, D. K., McMurray, J. J. V., Neal, B., Packer, M., Perkovic, V., … Wiviott, S. D. (2024). Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and major adverse cardiovascular outcomes: A SMART-C collaborative meta-analysis. Circulation, 149(23), 1789-1801.
Patil, D. Y. (2024). Robotics and automation in the construction industry. DIT. https://engg.dypvp.edu.in/Blogs/robotics-and-automation-in-the-construction-industry
Peng, M. Y. P., & Yan, X. (2022). Exploring the influence of determinants on behavior intention to use of multiple media kiosks through technology readiness and acceptance model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 852394.
Rasull, A., Jantan, A. H., Ali, M. H., Jaharudin, N. S., & Mansor, Z. D. (2020). Benefit and sacrifice factors determining internet banking adoption in Iraqi Kurdistan region. Journal of International Business and Management, 3(1), 1-20.
Reiff, J., & Schlegel, D. (2022). Hybrid project management: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 10(2), 45-63.
Romero-Rodríguez, J. M., Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., Buenestado-Fernández, M., & Lara-Lara, F. (2023). Use of ChatGPT at university as a tool for complex thinking: Students’ perceived usefulness. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12(2), 323-339.
Salar, H. C., & Hamutoglu, N. B. (2022). The role of perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness on personality traits among adults. Open Praxis, 14(2), 133-147.
Sami Ur Rehman, M., Thaheem, M. J., Nasir, A. R., & Khan, K. I. A. (2022). Project schedule risk management through building information modelling. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(8), 1489-1499.
Siagian, H., Tarigan, Z. J. H., Basana, S. R., & Basuki, R. (2022). The effect of perceived security, perceived ease of use, and perceived usefulness on consumer behavioral intention through trust in digital payment platform [Doctoral dissertation]. Petra Christian University.
Smolarek, B. B., & Scrivener, L. (2021). Examining business-driven education reform by new policy actors: A discursive analysis of UpSkill Houston. Journal of Education Policy, 36(3), 349-366.
Strickland, L., Farrell, S., Wilson, M. K., Hutchinson, J., & Loft, S. (2024). How do humans learn about the reliability of automation? Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 9(1), Article 8.
Tahar, A., Riyadh, H. A., Sofyani, H., & Purnomo, W. E. (2020). Perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, perceived security and intention to use e-filing: The role of technology readiness. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(9), 537-547.
Tawil, M. R., Subandi, M., Hernawan, M. A., & Diawati, P. (2023). The role of perceived ease of use, trust, product knowledge and perceived of convenience on intention to use of Sharia banking card. JEMSI (Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, dan Akuntansi), 9(2), 260-265.
Toros, E., Asiksoy, G., & Sürücü, L. (2024). Refreshment students’ perceived usefulness and attitudes towards using technology: a moderated mediation model. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-10.
Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365.
Venkatesh, V., Ganster, D. C., Schuetz, S. W., & Sykes, T. A. (2021). Risks and rewards of conscientiousness during the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(5), Article 643.
Zhang, C., Tian, L., & Chu, H. (2023). Usage frequency and application variety of research methods in library and information science: Continuous investigation from 1991 to 2021. Information Processing & Management, 60(6), Article 103507.
Zhang, H., Wu, C., Zhang, Z., Zhu, Y., Lin, H., Zhang, Z., Sun, Y., He, T., Mueller, J., Manmatha, R., Li, M., & Smola, A. (2022). ResNeSt: Split-attention networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 2736-2746). IEEE.
Zhang, Y., Ahmad, A., Azman, N., & Mingxia, W. (2023). The effect of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and social influence toward purchase intention mediated by trust in live streaming platform. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(9), e1284-e1284.
Downloads
Received: 03-05-2025Accepted: 28-08-2025Published: 08-09-2025Statistics Views
Abstract: 632 PDF: 94How to Cite
Ortiz, A. D., Jesus, J. B., Rosario, N. D., Sambrana, G., & Patalinghug, D. Y. (2025). Assessing the adoption and impact of construction automation technologies on project management efficiency: A case study of Cebu City. HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 16(1), 24–47. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.tech.en.16.1.4344.2026License
Copyright (c) 2025 April D. Ortiz; Jiomarie Balaquit Jesus; Nasvin Del Rosario; Geraldine Sambrana; Danilo Y. Patalinghug

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Nasvin Del Rosario
