Urban mobility analysis of megacity New York using density-based clustering techniques

Authors

DOI:

10.46223/HCMCOUJS.tech.en.16.3.4159.2026

Keywords:

clustering; DBSCAN; HDBSCAN; pearson correlationtaxi trips; urban mobility

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of two density-based clustering algorithms, such as DBSCAN (Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise) and HDBSCAN (Hierarchical DBSCAN), to evaluate their performance in identifying taxi demand patterns. Using the New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission’s (TLC) September 2015 yellow taxi dataset, which includes variables such as trip distance, duration, fare amount, passenger count, and geographic coordinates, the research applies clustering and correlation analyses to uncover spatial and behavioral mobility insights. The dataset was preprocessed to remove noise and inconsistencies before implementing both algorithms. Results show that HDBSCAN outperforms DBSCAN by effectively detecting clusters with varying densities, particularly in central Manhattan, and providing clearer, more accurate representations of taxi demand. In contrast, DBSCAN classified a larger proportion of the data as noise, revealing its limitations when the data are heterogeneous and highlighting its limitations in handling heterogeneous spatial distributions. Complementary analysis using Pearson’s Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient revealed a weak positive relationship (r = 0.21) between trip distance and duration, indicating the influence of traffic and route variability, and a strong correlation (r = 0.92) between trip distance and fare, reflecting the city’s distance-based pricing structure. The findings demonstrate that HDBSCAN offers superior performance for analyzing large-scale transportation datasets. The study provides empirical evidence supporting its use in urban mobility research and practical insights for transportation planners and policymakers to maximize fleet distribution, manage demand, and improve service delivery. Future work should integrate contextual variables such as time of day, payment methods, and tipping behavior to achieve a more comprehensive understanding of urban transportation dynamics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amalina, D. N., & Fauzan, A. (2024). A Hierarchical Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (HDBSCAN) approach for identifying potential villages in buleleng regency. https://doi.org/10.17977/um018v7i22024p187-199

Aziz, A., & Robila, S. A. (2019). Big data analysis: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Computer Applications, 178(19), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2019918866

Berg, M., Gunawan, A., & Roeloffzen, M. (2019). Faster DBSCAN and HDBSCAN in low-dimensional Euclidean spaces. International Journal of Computational Geometry & Applications, 29(1), 21-47. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218195919400028

Blanco-Portals, J., Peiró, F., & Estradé, S. (2022). Strategies for EELS data analysis: Introducing UMAP and HDBSCAN for dimensionality reduction and clustering. Microscopy and Microanalysis, 28(1), 109-120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927621012859

Campello, R. J. G. B., Moulavi, D., & Sander, J. (2013). Density-based clustering based on hierarchical density estimates. In J. Pei, V. S. Tseng, L. Cao, H. Motoda, & G. Xu (Eds.), Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining. PAKDD 2013. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 7819, pp. 160-172). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37456-2_14

Downloads

Received: 24-09-2025
Accepted: 12-11-2025
Published: 01-03-2026

Statistics

Abstract: 181
PDF: 92

FWCI: ---

How to Cite

Atillo, G. N. A. (2026). Urban mobility analysis of megacity New York using density-based clustering techniques. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Engineering and Technology, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.tech.en.16.3.4159.2026