--

6 (2) 2016

Limitations of inter-storey drift in seismic damage assessment of structures


Author - Affiliation:
Cao Van Vui - Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology, Vietnam National University HCMC , Vietnam
Corresponding author: Cao Van Vui - cvvui@hcmut.edu.vn

Abstract
In this study, inelastic time history of 3-storey frames is performed for three seismic intensities and the interstorey drifts are obtained. Damage distribution in the frames based on inter-storey drifts is then evaluated in comparison with the experimental and analytical damage. Though the “inter-storey drift” parameter due to its simplicity has been widely accepted in different seismic codes around the world, it is herein found that inter-storey drift suffers a number of limitations in interpreting the damage state of structures subjected to earthquakes.

Keywords
Damage index; Inter-storey drift; Damage assessment; RC frame; Seismicload.

Full Text:
PDF

References

ASCE. (2000). Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings Prepared for Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA Publication No. 356. Washington, D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency.


Banon, H., & Veneziano, D. (1982). Seismic safety of reinforced members and structures. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 10(2), 179-193.


Bozorgnia, Y., & Bertero, V. V. (2001). Evaluation of damage potential of recorded earthquake ground motion. Seismological Research Letters, 72(2), 233.


Bracci, J. M. (1992). Experimental and analytical study of seismic damage and retrofit of lightly reinforced concrete structures in low seismicity zones. Ph.D. Thesis, State University of New York at Buffalo.


Bracci, J. M., Reinhorn, A. M., & Mander, J. B. (1995). Seismic resistance of reinforced concrete frame structures designed for gravity loads: performance of structural system. ACI Structural Journal, 92(5), 597-608.


Cao, V. V., Ronagh, H., Ashraf, M., & Hassan, B. (2011). A new damage index for reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic loads. The First International Postgraduate Conference on Engineering, Designing and


Developing the Built Environment for Sustainable Wellbeing -eddBE2011, The Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia, 27-29 April, 194-199.


Corte, G. D., Barecchia, E., & Mazzolani, F. M. (2006). Seismic upgrading of RC buildings by FRP: full-scale tests of a real structure. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 18(5), 659–669. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:5(659)


Cosenza, E., Manfredi, G., & Ramasco, R. (1993). The use of damage functionals in earthquake engineering: A comparison between different methods. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 22(10), 855-868.


Cruz, M. F., & López, O. A. (2004). Design of reinforced concrete frames with damage control. Engineering Structures, 26(14), 2037-2045. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.01.002


Fajfar, P. (1992). Equivalent ductility factors, taking into account low-cycle fatigue. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 21, 837-848.


Fardis, M. N., Economu, S. N., Antoniou, A. N., Komodromos, P. J., & Sfakianakis, M. G. (1993). Damage measures and failure criteria - Part I, Contribution of University of Patras Final Report of Cooperative research on the seismic response of reinforced concrete structures - 2nd Phase.


Garcia, R., Hajirasouliha, I., & Pilakoutas, K. (2010). Seismic behaviour of deficient RC frames strengthened with CFRP composites. Engineering Structures, 32, 3075 - 3085.


Ghobarah, A., & Aly, N. M. (1998). Seismic reliability assessment of existing reinforced concrete buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2(4), 569-592.


Kim, T.-H., Lee, K.-M., Chung, Y.-S., & Shin, H. M. (2005). Seismic damage assessment of reinforced concrete bridge columns. Engineering Structures, 27, 576–592.


Kunnath, S. K., Reinhorn, A. M., & Lobo, R. F. (1992). IDARC Version 3.0: A Program for the Inelastic Damage Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures. Report No. NCEER-92-0022, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York at Buffalo.


Ludovico, M. D., Prota, A., Manfredi, G., & Cosenza, E. (2008). Seismic strengthening of an under-designed RC structure with FRP. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 37, 141–162.


Moustafa, A. (2011). Damage-based design earthquake loads for Single-Degree-Of-Freedom inelastic structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, 137(3), 456-467.


Park, Y.-J., & Ang, A. H.-S. (1985). Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 111(4), 722-739.


Phan, L. T., Todd, D. R., & Lew, H. S. (1993). Strengthening methodology for lightly reinforced concrete frames-I. Report NISTIR 5128.


Pinto, A. V., Verzeletti, G., Molina, J., Varum, H., Pinho, R., & Coelho, E. (2002). Pseudo-Dynamic Tests on NonSeismic Resisting RC Frames (Bare and Selective Retrofit). Ispra: Joint Research Centre.


Prakash, S. S., & Belarbi, A. (2010). Towards damage-based design approach for RC bridge columns under combined loadings using damage index models. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 14(26), 363-389.


Rodriguez, M. E., & Padilla, D. (2009). A damage index for the seismic analysis of reinforced concrete members. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 13(3), 364-383.


Sharma, A., Reddy, G. R., & Vaze, K. K. (2012). Shake table tests on a non-seismically detailed RC frame structure. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 41(1), 1-24.


Surahman, A. (2007). Earthquake-resistant structural design through energy demand and capacity. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 36(14), 2099-2117. doi: 10.1002/eqe.718


Tabeshpour, M. R., Bakhshi, A., & Golafshani, A. A. (2004). Vulnerability and damage analyses of existing buildings. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 1261.


Takeda, T., Sozen, M. A., & Nielsen, N. N. (1970). Reinforced concrete response to simulated earthquakes. Journal of the Structural Division, 96, 2557-2573.


Teran-Gilmore, A., & Jirsa, J. O. (2007). Energy demands for seismic design against low-cycle fatigue. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 36, 383–404.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.