English
17 (2) 2022
Các yếu tố ảnh hưởng đến mức độ hài lòng của người học đối với khóa học trực tuyến ngắn hạn và đề xuất cho phát triển MOOCs tại Việt Nam
Tác giả liên hệ, Email:Ngày nộp: 19-06-2022
Ngày duyệt đăng: 22-08-2022 Ngày xuất bản: 18-10-2022
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Trích dẫn:
Phan, T. T. N., Vuong, K. M., & Nguyen, Q. T. T. (2022). Các yếu tố ảnh hưởng đến mức độ hài lòng của người học đối với khóa học trực tuyến ngắn hạn và đề xuất cho phát triển MOOCs tại Việt Nam [Factors effecting learners’ satisfaction with online short courses and recommendations for developing MOOCs in Vietnam]. Tạp chí Khoa học Đại học Mở Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh – Khoa học xã hội, 17(2), 25-36. doi:10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.vi.17.2.2352.2022
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abuhassna, H., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Yahya, N., Zakaria, M. A. Z. M., Kosnin, A. B. M., & Darwish, M. (2020). Development of a new model on utilizing online learning platforms to improve students’ academic achievements and satisfaction. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1-23. doi:10.1186/s41239-020-00216-z
Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2008). The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(3/4), 3-22.
Albelbisi, N. A. (2020). Development and validation of the MOOC success scale (MOOC-SS). Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 4535-4555. doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10186-4
Al-Busaidi, K. A. (2012). Learners’ perspective on critical factors to LMS success in blended learning: An empirical investigation. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 30(2), 11-34. doi:10.17705/1cais.03002
Alraimi, K. M., Zo, H., & Ciganek, A. P. (2015). Understanding the MOOCs continuance: The role of openness and reputation. Computers & Education, 80, 28-38. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.006
Aparicio, M., Oliveira, T., Bacao, F., & Painho, M. (2019). Gamification: A key determinant of Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) success. Information & Management, 56(1), 39-54. doi:10.1016/j.im.2018.06.003
Bahaa, G. G. (2017). Learner satisfaction with massive open online courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 31(2), 98-111. doi:10.1080/08923647.2017.1300462
Bolliger, D. U. (2004). Key factors for determining student satisfaction in online courses. International Journal on E-learning, 3(1), 61-67.
Chanh Trung. (2014). Sôi động học trực tuyến [Lively online learning]. Truy cập ngày 19/05/2022 tại https://nld.com.vn/
Cho, V., Cheng, T. E., & Lai, W. J. (2009). The role of perceived user-interface design in continued usage intention of self-paced e-learning tools. Computers & Education, 53(2), 216-227. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.014
Dai, H. M., Teo, T., & Rappa, N. A. (2020). Understanding continuance intention among MOOC participants: The role of habit and MOOC performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 112, Article 106455. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106455
Daneji, A. A., Ayub, A. F. M., & Khambari, M. N. M. (2019). The effects of perceived usefulness, confirmation and satisfaction on continuance intention in using Massive Open Online Course (MOOC). Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 11(2), 201-214.
Davidson-Shivers, G. V. (2009). Frequency and types of instructor interactions in online instruction. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(1), 23-40.
Draus, P. J., Curran, M. J., & Trempus, M. S. (2014). The influence of instructor-generated video content on student satisfaction with and engagement in asynchronous online classes. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 240-254.
Eom, S. B., Wen, H. J., & Ashill, N. (2006). The determinants of students’ perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An empirical investigation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(2), 215-235.
Gray, J. A., & DiLoreto, M. (2016). The effects of student engagement, student satisfaction, and perceived learning in online learning environments. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 11(1), 1-20.
Gu, W., Xu, Y., & Sun, Z. J. (2021). Does MOOC quality affect users’ continuance intention? Based on an integrated model. Sustainability, 13(22), Article 12536. doi:10.3390/su132212536
Hoang, T., & Chu, N. N. M. (2008). Phân tích dữ liệu nghiên cứu với SPSS [Research data analysis using SPSS]. Hanoi, Vietnam: Nhà xuất bản Hồng Đức.
Jackson, L. C., Jones, S. J., & Rodriguez, R. C. (2010). Faculty actions that result in student satisfaction in online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 14(4), 78-96.
Jansen, D., Rosewell, J., & Kear, K. (2017). Quality frameworks for MOOCs. In M. Jemni, Kinshuk, & M. Khribi (Eds.), Open education: From OERs to MOOCs (pp. 261-281). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Jones, K. T., & Chen, C. C. (2008). Blended-learning in a graduate accounting course: Student satisfaction and course design issues. The Accounting Educators’ Journal, 18(2008), 15-28.
Joo, Y. J., So, H. J., & Kim, N. H. (2018). Examination of relationships among students’ self-determination, technology acceptance, satisfaction, and continuance intention to use K-MOOCs. Computers & Education, 122(2018), 260-272. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.003
Kumar, P., & Kumar, N. (2020). A study of learner’s satisfaction from MOOCs through a mediation model. Procedia Computer Science, 173(2020), 354-363. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2020.06.041
Lee, S. J., Srinivasan, S., Trail, T., Lewis, D., & Lopez, S. (2011). Examining the relationship among student perception of support, course satisfaction, and learning outcomes in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 158-163. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.04.001
Li, N., Marsh, V., & Rienties, B. (2016). Modelling and managing learner satisfaction: Use of learner feedback to enhance blended and online learning experience. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 14(2), 216-242. doi:10.1111/dsji.12096
Lu, Y., Wang, B., & Lu, Y. (2019). Understanding key drivers of MOOC satisfaction and continuance intention to use. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 20(2), 105-117.
Lucia-Palacios, L., Perez-Lopez, R., & Polo-Redondo, Y. (2020). How situational circumstances modify the effects of frontline employees’ competences on customer satisfaction with the store. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52, 30-45. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101905
Mikulic, J., & Prebezac, D. (2011). A critical review of techniques for classifying quality attributes in the Kano model. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 21(1), 46-66. doi:10.1108/09604521111100243
Mullen, G. E., & Tallent-Runnels, M. K. (2006). Student outcomes and perceptions of instructors’ demands and support in online and traditional classrooms. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(4), 257-266. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.08.005
Palmer, S., & Holt, D. (2009). Examining student satisfaction with wholly online learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(2), 101-113. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00294.x
Pozon-Lopez, I., Higueras-Castillo, E., Muñoz-Leiva, F., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. J. (2020). Perceived user satisfaction and intention to use Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 33(1), 85-120. doi:10.1007/s12528-020-09257-9
Sahin, I., & Shelley, M. (2008). Considering students’ perceptions: The distance education student satisfaction model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 216-223.
Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183-1202. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007
Wu, Y. C., Tsai, C. S., Hsiung, H. W., & Chen, K. Y. (2015). Linkage between frontline employee service competence scale and customer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Services Marketing, 29(3), 224-234. doi:10.1108/jsm-02-2014-0058.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.