Learning with algorithms: Artificial Intelligence (AI) usage, trust, and literacy among university students
Authors
-
Nguyen Bao Ngoc
Van Lang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnamhttps://orcid.org/0009-0003-3681-9077
- Trinh Minh Quan
Van Lang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnamhttps://orcid.org/0009-0005-4607-4675- Luong Thai Ha
Van Lang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnamhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4636-1170- Nguyen Hong Mai mai.nh@vlu.edu.vn
Van Lang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnamhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8013-2705DOI:
10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.16.12.4505.2026Keywords:
AI usage literacy; AI using behavior; critical thinking; higher education; trust in AIAbstract
As Artificial Intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly integrated into higher education, understanding the mechanisms behind students’ effective use of AI tools is critical. This study examines the impact of AI usage behavior on AI usage literacy, with critical thinking as a mediator and trust in AI as a moderator. A quantitative approach using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was applied to data collected from 296 university students in Vietnam. The findings confirm that AI usage behavior positively influences both critical thinking and AI usage literacy. Critical thinking significantly contributes to AI literacy and mediates the relationship between usage behavior and literacy. Furthermore, trust in AI strengthens the relationship between AI usage behavior and literacy, with a significant moderating effect. These results emphasize the importance of cognitive engagement and trust calibration in AI-supported learning. The study offers theoretical and practical contributions to the development of AI literacy in higher education and highlights the need for pedagogy that promotes critical thinking and responsible trust in AI systems. These findings urge higher education institutions to embed AI literacy and critical thinking in curricula and provide training for educators to foster students’ ethical, reflective, and effective AI engagement.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.References
Abulibdeh, A., Zaidan, E., & Abulibdeh, R. (2024). Navigating the confluence of artificial intelligence and education for sustainable development in the era of industry 4.0: Challenges, opportunities, and ethical dimensions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 437, Article 140527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140527
Al-Adwan, A. S., Li, N., Al-Adwan, A., Abbasi, G. A., Albelbisi, N. A., & Habibi, A. (2023). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to predict university students’ intentions to use metaverse-based learning platforms. Education and Information Technologies, 28(11), 15381-15413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11816-3
Alzahrani, L. (2023). Analyzing students’ attitudes and behavior toward artificial intelligence technologies in higher education. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 11(6), 65-73. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.F7475.0311623
Baidoo-Anu, D., & Ansah, L. O. (2023). Education in the era of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1337500
Benvenuti, M., Cangelosi, A., Weinberger, A., Mazzoni, E., Benassi, M., Barbaresi, M., & Orsoni, M. (2023). Artificial intelligence and human behavioral development: A perspective on new skills and competences acquisition for the educational context. Computers in Human Behavior, 148, Article 107903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107903
Celik, I. (2023). Towards Intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers’ professional knowledge to ethically integrate Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based tools into education. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, Article 107468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107468
Chen, X., Xie, H., & Hwang, G. J. (2020). A multi-perspective study on artificial intelligence in education: Grants, conferences, journals, software tools, institutions, and researchers. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, Article 100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100005
Choi, S., Jang, Y., & Kim, H. (2023). Influence of pedagogical beliefs and perceived trust on teachers’ acceptance of educational artificial intelligence tools. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 39(4), 910-922. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2049145
Choung, H., David, P., & Ross, A. (2023). Trust in AI and its role in the acceptance of AI technologies. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 39(9), 1727-1739. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2050543
Ciampa, K., Wolfe, Z. M., & Bronstein, B. (2023). ChatGPT in education: Transforming digital literacy practices. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 67(3), 186-195. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1310
Davis, F. D. (1989). Technology acceptance model: TAM. Al-Suqri, MN, Al-Aufi, AS: Information Seeking Behavior and Technology Adoption, 205(219), Article 5.
Doroudi, S. (2023). The intertwined histories of artificial intelligence and education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 33(4), 885-928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-022-00313-2
Duong, C. D., Vu, T. N., & Ngo, T. V. N. (2023). Applying a modified technology acceptance model to explain higher education students’ usage of ChatGPT: A serial multiple mediation model with knowledge sharing as a moderator. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(3), Article 100883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100883
Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93-106.
Essien, A., Bukoye, O. T., O’Dea, X., & Kremantzis, M. (2024). The influence of AI text generators on critical thinking skills in UK business schools. Studies in Higher Education, 49(5), 865-882. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2316881
Ferrario, A., Loi, M., & Viganò, E. (2020). In AI we trust incrementally: A multi-layer model of trust to analyze human-artificial intelligence interactions. Philosophy & Technology, 33(3), 523-539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-019-00378-3
Gašević, D., Siemens, G., & Sadiq, S. (2023). Empowering learners for the age of artificial intelligence. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article 100130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100130
Gillath, O., Ai, T., Branicky, M. S., Keshmiri, S., Davison, R. B., & Spaulding, R. (2021). Attachment and trust in artificial intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, Article 106607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106607
Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. W. (2020). Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 627-660. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0057
Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). An introduction to structural equation modeling. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook (pp. 1-29). Springer Cham.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Kaplan, A. D., Kessler, T. T., Brill, J. C., & Hancock, P. A. (2023). Trust in artificial intelligence: Meta-analytic findings. Human Factors, 65(2), 337-359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720821101398
Kong, S. C., Cheung, W. M. Y., & Zhang, G. (2023). Evaluating an artificial intelligence literacy programme for developing university students’ conceptual understanding, literacy, empowerment and ethical awareness. Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 16-30.
Langer, M., König, C. J., Back, C., & Hemsing, V. (2023). Trust in artificial intelligence: Comparing trust processes between human and automated trustees in light of unfair bias. Journal of Business and Psychology, 38(3), 493-508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-022-09829-9
Limna, P., Jakwatanatham, S., Siripipattanakul, S., Kaewpuang, P., & Sriboonruang, P. (2022). A review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education during the digital era. Advance Knowledge for Executives, 1(1), 1-9.
Ma, S., & Lei, L. (2024). The factors influencing teacher education students’ willingness to adopt artificial intelligence technology for information-based teaching. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 44(1), 94-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2305155
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
Nazaretsky, T., Ariely, M., Cukurova, M., & Alexandron, G. (2022). Teachers’ trust in AI‐powered educational technology and a professional development program to improve it. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(4), 914-931. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
Nguyen, A., Ngo, H. N., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Nguyen, B. P. T. (2023). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 4221-4241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w
Ouyang, F., & Jiao, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: The three paradigms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, Article 100020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100020
Park, S. S., Tung, C. D., & Lee, H. (2021). The adoption of AI service robots: A comparison between credence and experience service settings. Psychology & Marketing, 38(4), 691-703. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21468
Park, S. Y., Nam, M. W., & Cha, S. B. (2012). University students’ behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 592-605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01229.x
Rusandi, M. A., Ahman, Saripah, I., Khairun, D. Y., & Mutmainnah. (2023). No worries with ChatGPT: Building bridges between artificial intelligence and education with critical thinking soft skills. Journal of Public Health, 45(3), e602-e603. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdad049
Ryan, M. (2020). In AI we trust: Ethics, artificial intelligence, and reliability. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(5), 2749-2767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00228-y
Southworth, J., Migliaccio, K., Glover, J., Reed, D., McCarty, C., Brendemuhl, J., & Thomas, A. (2023). Developing a model for AI Across the curriculum: Transforming the higher education landscape via innovation in AI literacy. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article 100127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100127
Stolpe, K., & Hallström, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence literacy for technology education. Computers and Education Open, 6, Article 100159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100159
Walter, Y. (2024). Embracing the future of Artificial Intelligence in the classroom: The relevance of AI literacy, prompt engineering, and critical thinking in modern education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3
Watson, G. (1980). Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal. Psychological Corporation.
Downloads
Received: 23-06-2025Accepted: 29-07-2025Published: 07-09-2025Statistics
Abstract: 1447 PDF: 563
FWCI: ---How to Cite
Nguyen, B. N., Trinh, M. Q., Luong, T. H., & Nguyen, H. M. (2025). Learning with algorithms: Artificial Intelligence (AI) usage, trust, and literacy among university students. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences, 16(12). https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.16.12.4505.2026License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nguyen Bao Ngoc; Trinh Minh Quan; Luong Thai Ha; Nguyen Hong Mai

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Similar Articles
- Mai Son Tung, Ha Minh Tri, Transformative education as an orientation for sustainable development of higher education in Vietnam: An exploratory study , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences: 12 (2) 2022
- Nguyen Huu Tai, Students’ perceptions of applying critical thinking to learning and practicing English speaking skills , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences: 12 (2) 2022
- William D. Magday, Jr., Jerwin F. Memita, Joel T. Abon, Gail G. Gumilet, Alma Bella G. Cablinan, Lhea T. Castro, Jenny Grace E. Gamurot, Elson Boie B. Tumaneng, Enhancing students’ subject-verb agreement skill by using CiCi artificial intelligence-based app: Embedded mixed-methods study , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences: 15(2)2025
- Danisse Mae Paray Hernandez, Dyanika Paray Nolasco, Embracing e-learning in a higher education institution in the Philippines , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences: 15(4)2025
- Jiomarie Balaquit Jesus, Generma Gemparo Galleon, Olga Gallardo, Joseph Sol Tunacao Galleon, Charito Bonghanoy, Integrating Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB): Generational mediation in the intention and behavior toward Artificial Intelligence (AI) use in higher education , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences: 16(9)2026
- Vu Thi Hong Van, Nguyen Van My, Critical thinking - An essential skill for English pedagogical major students: Review and applications , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences: 9 (2) 2019
- Nguyen Thi Minh Tram, Bui Thi Thuc Quyen, The effects of grouping types on promoting critical thinking in EFL collaborative writing , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences: 9 (2) 2019
- Frances May Sagnoy Monte, John Freil Almaden, Keith Vicada Batulan, Christian Darille Salvacion Jacquez, Thomas Conrad Cane Lawas, Reynaldo Cababan Tondo, Edin Bulagao Hornido, Romel Cayao Mutya, Leadership style and management skills as predictors of hospitality and tourism management students’ leadership behavior , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences: 16(3)2026
- Weena Mae G. Ampo, Voices of English major students in literary criticism course in the age of artificial intelligence , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences: 16(5)2026
- Le Dinh Minh Tri, Tran Thi Hoang Lam, Nguyen Quang Trang, Service quality in higher education: Applying HEdPERF scale in Vietnamese universities , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences: 11 (1) 2021
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
- Trinh Minh Quan
