Factors affecting student engagement in higher education: A case study from Vietnam
Authors
-
Nguyen Xuan Tho
thonx5@fe.edu.vn
Greenwich Vietnam, FPT University - Da Nang Campus, Da Nang City, Vietnamhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7954-8914
- Nguyen Quynh Anh
Greenwich Vietnam, FPT University - Da Nang Campus, Da Nang City, Vietnamhttps://orcid.org/0009-0000-4209-5149- Pham Anh Quynh Duyen
Greenwich Vietnam, FPT University - Da Nang Campus, Da Nang City, Vietnamhttps://orcid.org/0009-0003-6476-8764DOI:
10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.16.9.4450.2026Keywords:
big five; EFA; module content; peer mentoring; regression analysis; student engagementAbstract
This study aims to examine and validate the factors influencing student engagement in higher education, while considering the moderating role of students’ personal traits in these relationships. Using Greenwich Vietnam as the context for data collection, the dataset comprises responses from 166 students
(N = 166) across four campuses of Greenwich University in Vietnam. These students were asked to assess their personality based on the Big Five traits via the website https://www.truity.com/test/big-five-personality-test, which was embedded in the questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were employed to highlight the characteristics of the respondents, followed by reliability testing and Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). Subsequently, multivariable regression was conducted to test the research hypotheses. Finally, a one-way ANOVA was performed to examine mean differences among various groups of control variables in relation to student engagement. The results show that student motivation, module content, and peer mentoring significantly and positively impact student engagement
(B1 = 0.260, t₁ = 2.958; B2 = 0.382, t₂ = 4.630; B5 = 0.205,
t₅ = 2.734, respectively). Although the learning environment and university support exhibit positive relationships with student engagement (B3 = 0.80 and B4 = 0.25, respectively), these relationships are not statistically significant in this study (p-values = 0.339 and 0.806, respectively). Regarding personal traits, students who exhibit open-mindedness are more likely to engage with their studies than those who are close-minded. Additionally, students with high levels of conscientiousness show greater engagement than those who are less conscientious. Unexpectedly, extroverted students demonstrate lower levels of engagement compared to their introverted peers. Similarly, students with emotional stability are found to have lower mean engagement scores than those characterized by neuroticism or emotional instability. The findings of this study provide a comprehensive theoretical framework applicable to higher education in Vietnam, particularly at Greenwich Vietnam, where the UK curriculum is integrated with the Vietnamese educational environment. In terms of practical implications, the research offers new directions for enhancing student engagement by fostering motivation, improving the curriculum, and strengthening peer mentoring support.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.References
Adams, R., & Granić, A. (2009). Cognitive learning approaches to the design of accessible e-learning systems. In C. Mourlas, N. Tsianos, & P. Germanakos (Eds.), Cognitive and emotional processes in Web-based education: Integrating human factors and personalization (pp. 209-228). Information Science Reference/IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-392-0.ch012
Ahlstrom, L., & Holmberg, C. (2021). A comparison of three interactive examination designs in active learning classrooms for nursing students. BMC Nursing, 20(1), 1-12.
Aldahdouh, T. Z., Murtonen, M., Riekkinen, J., Vilppu, H., Nguyen, T., & Nokelainen, P. (2023). University teachers’ profiles based on digital innovativeness and instructional adaptation to Covid-19: Association with learning patterns and teacher demographics. Education and Information Technologies, 28(11), 14473-14491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11748-y
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002
Artino, A. R., Jr. (2010). Online or face-to-face learning? Exploring the personal factors that predict students’ choice of instructional format. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 272-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.07.005
Austin, B. (2022). The impact of intervention programs for teenagers at risk among middle and high school students in Southeast Missouri [Doctoral dissertation, Lindenwood University]. https://digitalcommons.lindenwood.edu/dissertations/742/
Barrett, P., Zhang, Y., Moffat, J., & Kobbacy, K. (2013). A holistic, multi-level analysis identifying the impact of classroom design on pupils’ learning. Building and Environment, 59, 678-689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.09.016
Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. (2001). The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 133-149. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709901158433
Bond, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through the flipped learning approach in K-12: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 151, Article 103819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103819
Bramley, C., & Morrison, K. (2022). Student engagement, higher education, and social justice: Beyond neoliberalism and the market. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003331292
Bryson, C. (2010, December 14-16). Reaching a common understanding of the meaning of student engagement. Society for Research into Higher Education (SRHE) Annual Conference 2010. https://srhe.ac.uk/arc/conference2010/abstracts/0096.pdf
Burch, G. F., Heller, N. A., Burch, J. J., Freed, R., & Steed, S. A. (2015). Student engagement: Developing a conceptual framework and survey instrument. Journal of Education for Business, 90(4), 224-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2015.1019821
Caldwell, K. W., Millis, C., Constant, T. N., Borg, P., Threatt-Morgan, K., & Burke, C. J. (2021). Student readiness of colleges: A qualitative study. Journal of College Access, 6(1), Article 5.
Cantero, J. M. M., Mira, R. G., & López-Chao, V. (2016). Influence of physical learning environment in student’s behavior and social relations. The Anthropologist, 25(3), 249-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2016.11892113
Cayubit, R. F. O. (2022). Why learning environment matters? An analysis on how the learning environment influences the academic motivation, learning strategies and engagement of college students. Learning Environments Research, 25(2), 581-599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09382-x
Cheng, Y. C. (2002). New paradigm for re-engineering education: Globalization, localization, and individualization. Higher Education Policy, 15(2), 165-177. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3620-5
Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
Cook, D. A., & Artino, A. R., Jr. (2016). Motivation to learn: An overview of contemporary theories. Medical Education,50(10), 997-1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13074
Culpeper, J., & Kan, Q. (2020). Communicative styles, rapport, and student engagement: An online peer mentoring scheme. Applied Linguistics, 41(5), 756-786. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz035
Damodaran, S. (2020). The role of student engagement in the relationship between classroom motivation and academic achievement [Doctoral dissertation, University of Malaya]. http://ir.upm.edu.my/find/Record/u1144248
Farrell, O., & Brunton, J. (2020). A balancing act: A window into online student engagement experiences. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), Article 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00199-x
Fitzgerald, H. E., Bruns, K., Sonka, S. T., Furco, A., & Swanson, L. (2012). The centrality of engagement in higher education. In S. T. Bruns, J. H. Barnhill, & T. V. Goldstein (Eds.), Building the field of higher education engagement (pp. 201-219). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/978100344353-12
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
Gamage, K. A., Perera, D. S., & Wijewardena, M. D. N. (2021). Mentoring and coaching as a learning technique in higher education: The impact of learning context on student engagement in online learning. Education Sciences, 11(10), Article 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100574
García, H. A., Garza, T., & Yeaton-Hromada, K. (2019). Do we belong? A conceptual model for international students’ sense of belonging in community colleges. Journal of International Students, 9(2), 460-487. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v9i2.669
Gil, A. J., Antelm‐Lanzat, A. M., Cacheiro‐González, M. L., & Pérez‐Navío, E. (2021). The effect of family support on student engagement: Towards the prevention of dropouts. Psychology in the Schools, 58(6), 1082-1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22490
Greenwich Vietnam. (2024). Greenwich Vietnam. https://greenwich.edu.vn/en/about-greenwich-vietnam/
Guardino, C., & Fullerton, E. (2010). Changing behaviors by changing the classroom environment. Teaching Exceptional Children, 42(6), 8-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991004200601
Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic econometrics (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Guo, Q., Samsudin, S., Yang, X., Gao, J., Ramlan, M. A., Abdullah, B., & Farizan, N. H. (2023). Relationship between perceived teacher support and student engagement in physical education: A systematic review. Sustainability, 15(7), Article 6039. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076039
Habib, E., Garousi-Nejad, I., Gallagher, M. A., Tarboton, D. G., & Lane, B. (2021). An open web-based module developed to advance data-driven hydrologic process learning. Hydrological Processes, 35(7), e14273. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14273
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
Halabieh, H., Hawkins, S., Bernstein, A. E., Lewkowicz, S., Unaldi Kamel, B., Fleming, L., & Levitin, D. (2022). The future of higher education: Identifying current educational problems and proposed solutions. Education Sciences, 12(12), Article 888. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120888
Hassan, A., Anwar, I., Saleem, I., Islam, K. M. B., & Hussain, S. A. (2021). Individual entrepreneurial orientation, entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intention: The mediating role of entrepreneurial motivations. Industry and Higher Education, 35(4), 403-418. https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222211007051
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332
Havik, T., & Westergård, E. (2020). Do teachers matter? Students’ perceptions of classroom interactions and student engagement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(4), 488-507. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1577754
Iqbal, K., & Modood, T. (2023). Students’ educational drive and ethnic capital. Journal of Community Psychology, 51(5), 2083-2097. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.23011
Jaeger, M., & Adair, D. (2017). Investigating students’ perceived autonomy support, competence, and relatedness, and the relationship to students’ motivation to learn. In Proceedings of the 6th International Research Symposium on PBL (pp. 338-350). Aalborg University Press. https://www.academia.edu/34501923/Investigating_students_perceived_autonomy_support_competence_and_relatedness_and_the_relationship_to_students_motivation_to_learn
Jesionkowska, J., Wild, F., & Deval, Y. (2020). Active learning augmented reality for STEAM education - A case study. Education Sciences, 10(8), Article 198. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10080198
Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758-773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
Keijzer, R., van der Rijst, R., van Schooten, E., & Admiraal, W. (2021). Individual differences among at-risk students changing the relationship between resilience and vocational identity. International Journal of Educational Research, 110, Article 101893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101893
Keiler, L. S., Diotti, R., & Hudon, K. (2023). Supporting teachers as they support each other: Lessons concerning mentor teacher feedback to teacher mentees. Professional Development in Education, 49(2), 225-242. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1839781
Kelly, R. F., Mihm-Carmichael, M., & Hammond, J. A. (2021). Students’ engagement in and perceptions of blended learning in a clinical module in a veterinary degree program. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 48(2), 181-195. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.2019-0018
Kiefer, S. M., Alley, K. M., & Ellerbrock, C. R. (2015). Teacher and peer support for young adolescents’ motivation, engagement, and school belonging. Rmle Online, 38(8), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2015.11641184
Koca, F. (2016). Motivation to learn and teacher-student relationship. Journal of International Education and Leadership, 6(2), Article n2. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1135209
Leal, F., Veloso, B., Pereira, C. S., Moreira, F., Durão, N., & Silva, N. J. (2022). Interpretable success prediction in higher education institutions using pedagogical surveys. Sustainability, 14(20), Article 13446. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013446
Li, J., & Xue, E. (2023). Dynamic interaction between student learning behaviour and learning environment: Meta-analysis of student engagement and its influencing factors. Behavioral Sciences, 13(1), Article 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13010059
Li, M., & Li, J. (2023). Using Perusall to motivate students’ curriculum-based academic reading. Journal of Computers in Education, 10(2), 377-401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-022-00234-y
Lyons, C., Brown, T., & Bourke-Taylor, H.M. (2018). The Classroom Environment Questionnaire (CEQ): Development and preliminary structural validity. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 65(5), 363-375. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12474
Ma, S., Herman, G. L., Tomkin, J. H., Mestre, J. P., & West, M. (2018). Spreading teaching innovations in social networks: The bridging role of mentors. Journal for STEM Education Research, 1(1-2), 60-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-018-0002-6
Malhotra, N. K. (2004). Marketing research: An applied orientation (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
Maroco, J., Maroco, A. L., Campos, J. A. D. B., & Fredricks, J. A. (2016). University student’s engagement: Development of the University Student Engagement Inventory (USEI). Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 29, Article 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-016-0042-8
Martin, F., & Borup, J. (2022). Online learner engagement: Conceptual definitions, research themes, and supportive practices. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 162-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2089147
McKeithan, G. K., Rivera, M. O., Mann, L. E., & Mann, L. B. (2021). Strategies to promote meaningful student engagement in online settings. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 9(4), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v9i4.5135.
McMillan, J. H., & Hearn, J. (2008). Student self-assessment: The key to stronger student motivation and higher achievement. Educational horizons, 87(1), 40-49.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. US Department of Education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED505824
Mihiretie, D. M. (2023). The pedagogy of teacher education in Ethiopia: Reconstructing understandings and practices on teaching about teaching and learning to teach. Bahir Dar Journal of Education, 23(2), 22-58. https://doi.org/10.4314/bdje.v23i2.3
Mostafaei-Alaei, M., & Hosseinnezhad, H. (2020). The development and validation of Peer Support Questionnaire (PSQ). Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills), 39(3.2), 67-109. https://doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2021.38853.2906
Nasir, M. A. M., Janikowski, T., Guyker, W., & Wang, C. C. (2020). Modifying the student course engagement questionnaire for use with online courses. Journal of Educators Online, 17(1), Article 11.
Natriello, G. (1984). Problems in the evaluation of students and student disengagement from secondary schools. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 17(4), 14-24.
Nikolaeva, T. (2020). Role of motivation on students’ academic performance. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 7(3), 1-10.
Nungu, L., Mukama, E., & Nsabayezu, E. (2023). Online collaborative learning and cognitive presence in mathematics and science education. Case study of university of Rwanda, college of education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(9), 10865-10884. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11607-w
Ozerem, A., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2015). Learning environments designed according to learning styles and its effects on mathematics achievement. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, (61), 61-80. http://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2015.61.4
Patrick, H., Ryan, A. M., & Kaplan, A. (2007). Early adolescents’ perceptions of the classroom social environment, motivational beliefs, and engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 83-98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.83
Pedler, M., Hudson, S., & Yeigh, T. (2020). The teachers’ role in student engagement: A review. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 45(3), 48-62. http://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2020v45n3.4
Peterson, R. A. (1994). A meta-analysis of cronbach’s coefficient alpha. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.1086/209405
Pieters, J. M., Ritzen, H., & van Uden, J. M., (2013). I think I can engage my students. Teachers’ perceptions of student engagement and their beliefs about being a teacher. Teaching and Teacher Education, 32, 43-54. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.01.004
Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), Article 667. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Qudsyi, H., Sa’diyah, S. K., & Mahara, R. (2016). Student engagement among high-school students in Indonesia: Prediction of family functioning and peer support. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Education, Psychology, and Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 247-266). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200129.032
Quigley, M., Bradley, A., Playfoot, D., & Harrad, R. (2022). Personality traits and stress perception as predictors of students’ online engagement during the Covid-19 pandemic. Personality and Individual Differences, 194, Article 111645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111645
Qureshi, M. A., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J. A., Raza, S. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2023). Factors affecting students’ learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4), 2371-2391. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1884886
Rands, M. L., & Gansemer-Topf, A. M. (2017). The room itself is active: How classroom design impacts student engagement. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(1), 26-33.
Saeed, S., & Zyngier, D. (2012). How motivation influences student engagement: A qualitative case study. Journal of Education and Learning, 1(2), 252-267. http://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v1n2p252
Sarkis, A. S., Hallit, S., Hajj, A., Kechichian, A., Karam Sarkis, D., Sarkis, A., & Nasser Ayoub, E. (2020). Lebanese students’ motivation in medical school: Does it change throughout the years? A cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education, 20, Article 94. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02011-w
Schademan, A. R., & Thompson, M. R. (2016). Are college faculty and first-generation, low-income students ready for each other? Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 18(2), 194-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025115584748
Scott-Webber, L., Strickland, A., & Kapitula, L. R. (2014). Built environments impact behaviors: Results of an active learning post-occupancy evaluation. Planning for Higher Education Journal, 42(1), 28-39.
Sewagegn, A. A., & Diale, B. M. (2021). Modular/Block teaching: Practices and challenges at higher education institutions of Ethiopia. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(6), 776-789. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1681391
Shernoff, D. J., Ruzek, E. A., & Sinha, S. (2017). The influence of the high school classroom environment on learning as mediated by student engagement. School Psychology International, 38(2), 201-218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034316666413
Steele, K., VanRyn, V., Stanescu, C., Rogers, J., & Wehrwein, E. (2020). Start with the end in mind: Using student career aspirations and backward design to drive curriculum development. American Journal of Educational Research, 8(6), 397-404. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-8-6-3
Steinberger, P., Eshet, Y., & Grinautsky, K. (2021). No anxious student is left behind: Statistics anxiety, personality traits, and academic dishonesty - lessons from Covid-19. Sustainability, 13(9), Article 4762. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094762
Strait, J. R., & Lima, M. (Eds.). (2023). The future of service-learning: New solutions for sustaining and improving practice. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003447825
Tan, M., & Hew, K. F. (2016). Incorporating meaningful gamification in a blended learning research methods class: Examining student learning, engagement, and affective outcomes. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(5), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2232
Tani, M., Gheith, M. H., & Papaluca, O. (2021). Drivers of student engagement in higher education: A behavioral reasoning theory perspective. Higher Education, 82(3), 499-518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00647-7
Tanner, C. K. (2009). The influence of school architecture on academic achievement. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(3), 381-399. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230010373598
The Glossary of Education Reform. (2013). Learning environment. The glossary of education reform. Great Schools Partnership. https://www.edglossary.org/learning-environment/
Timms, C., Fishman, T., Godineau, A., Granger, J., & Sibanda, T. (2018). Psychological engagement of university students: Learning communities and family relationships. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 10(3), 243-255. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-09-2017-0107
Timor, U., Peled-Laskov, R., & Golan, E. (2023). Student mentors of incarcerated persons: Contribution of a mentoring program for incarcerated persons. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 34(1), 65-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/088740342211300
Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1992). The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 1003-1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004025
Wentzel, K. R., Battle, A., Russell, S. L., & Looney, L. B. (2010). Social supports from teachers and peers as predictors of academic and social motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(3), 193-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.03.002
Wickremasinghe, H. T., & Kumuduni, W. Y. (2022). Impact of physical learning environment on university students’ academic engagement in an online learning setting during Covid-19: Evidence from a Sri Lankan university. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 9(3), 35-46. https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v9.n3.953
Winkelmes, M. A., Bernacki, M., Butler, J., Zochowski, M., Golanics, J., & Weavil, K. H. (2016). A teaching intervention that increases underserved college students’ success. Peer Review, 18(1/2), 31-36.
Wong, Z. Y., & Liem, G. A. D. (2022). Student engagement: Current state of the construct, conceptual refinement, and future research directions. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 107-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09628-3
Yang, M., Yan, Z., Yang, L., & Zhan, Y. (2025). Peer assessment: A powerful way to cultivate student assessment literacy. In Understanding and developing student assessment literacy (pp. 51-67). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-9484-3_4
Yuan, J., & Kim, C. (2014). Guidelines for facilitating the development of learning communities in online courses. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(3), 220-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12042
Zandvliet, D. B., & Fraser, B. J. (2005). Physical and psychosocial environments associated with networked classrooms. Learning Environments Research, 8(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-005-7951-2
Zepke, N. (2017). Student engagement in neoliberal times: Theories and practices for learning and teaching in higher education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0325-3
Received: 03-06-2025Accepted: 07-10-2025Published: 19-10-2025Statistics
Abstract: 466 Appendix: 63 PDF: 30
FWCI: ---How to Cite
Nguyen, X. T., Nguyen, Q. A., & Pham, A. Q. D. (2025). Factors affecting student engagement in higher education: A case study from Vietnam. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences, 16(9), 50–76. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.16.9.4450.2026License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nguyen Xuan Tho; Nguyen Quynh Anh; Pham Anh Quynh Duyen

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Similar Articles
- Pham Quang Binh, Dinh Thi Thanh Hang, Enhancing student engagement in oral presentations through student-constructed rubrics , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences: 16(6)2026
- Mario R. Briones, Karen Ang Manaig, Ruel T. Bonganciso, John Frederick B. Tesoro, Chester Alexis C. Buama, Michelle B. Sarmiento, Sherwin B. Sapin, e-Work Self-Efficacy digital competence and work engagement of teachers in public secondary schools from two provinces in the Philippines , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences: 13 (2) 2023
- Venson Ray Felicia Olaguer, Shada Marie Mecaydor Marcos, Roanne Aguipo Solayao, Eden Rose Brignas Pelaez, Kevin Taer Lagat, Blended learning in higher education: Correlating teaching presence, student engagement, and satisfaction , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences: 16(2)2026
- Le Thi Thuy Nhung, Nguyen Hoang Thao Nguyen, EFL teachers’ experiences of peer observation in Vietnamese academic institutions , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences: 13 (1) 2023
- Charina Bardoquillo, Angen May Charcos, Comparative study on the evaluation of student teacher’s performance , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences: 14(4)2024
- Nguyen Ngoc Ly, Applying online peer feedback via a peer review application in English academic writing , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences: 13 (1) 2023
- Angen May Fabro Charos, An investigation into students’ engagement in English learning at Cebu Technological University - Tuburan Campus , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences: 16(6)2026
- Cyrus Osigan Arabejo, Roldan Magsacay Egay, Glaydel Uban Alferez, Arlen Gumanit Martin, Jovenal Ventic Dela Cruz Jr., Parenting and academic experience: The dual roles of motherhood and student life , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences: 15(5)2025
- Nguyen Tan Luong, Nguyen Ngoc Thong, Exploring the impact of support service on student satisfaction: The case of Vietnam higher education , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences: 11 (2) 2021
- Karen A. Manaig, Lerma P. Buenvinida, Alberto D. Yazon, Ruel T. Bonganciso, Unveiling the link between organizational commitment, professional self-esteem, and work engagement of Filipino faculty members in state universities and colleges , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences: 14 (1) 2024
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
- Nguyen Quynh Anh
