Generative AI tool usage: The dual-faced experience of the in-service teachers following the MTESOL program
Authors
-
Le Thi Thanh Thu
thu.ltt@ou.edu.vn
Ho Chi Minh City Open University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnamhttps://orcid.org/0009-0003-4906-9586
DOI:
10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.16.10.4368.2026Keywords:
EFL teachers’ experience; generatie AI tool usage; Master of TESOL students’ experienceAbstract
The study explored the Generative AI tool usage of 29 in-service EFL teachers who were currently following a Master of TESOL program in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Data were collected via an online questionnaire. As students, the respondents were quite young, familiar with Generative AI tools, and were frequent users of Chat GPT, Grammarly, and Gemini. The majority of respondents, though being aware of AI concerns, positively integrated or experimented with Generative AI in their learning. They acknowledged Generative AI tool benefits, but somewhat expressed ambivalence, insisting on critical evaluation of the prompts, and the majority of them had applied various strategies for responsible use. In the role of the teacher, the respondents also predominantly reflected their AI-positive practice with their teaching, mostly with lesson planning, and then teaching practice. Fewer accounted for their extensive AI usage with an assessment. While appreciating AI’s potential values, the respondents, in turn, expressed their concerns about students’ critical, and creative ability to be eliminated, the more accessible dishonesty, and challenges in identifying instances of Chat GPT use. As a whole, the respondents had prevalently integrated Generative AI tools in their learning and teaching. They strongly asserted that their main focus was on how AI could be used to enhance learning and teaching, and that they eagerly headed to integrating Generative AI tools into their EFL teaching practices. The findings have highlighted the practical benefits of AI integration and call for further study of the strategies the young AI users have applied for responsible use.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.References
Abbas, M., Jam, F. A., & Khan, T. I. (2024). Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(10). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00444-7
Acosta-Enriquez, B. G., Arbulú Ballesteros, M. A., Vargas, C. G. A. P., Ulloa, M. N. O., Ulloa, C. R. G., Romero, J. M. P., Jaramillo, N. D. G., Orellana, H. U. C., Anzoategui, D. X. A., & Roca, C. L. (2024). Knowledge, attitudes, and perceived Ethics regarding the use of ChatGPT among generation Z university students. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 20(1), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00157-4
Adel, A., Ahsan, A., & Davison, C. (2024). ChatGPT promises and challenges in education: Computational and ethical perspectives. Education Sciences, 14(8), Article 814. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080814
Ajlouni, A., Abd-Alkareem, W. F., & Almahaireh, A. S. (2023). Students’ attitudes towards using ChatGPT as a learning tool: The case of the University of Jordan. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 17(18), 99-117. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i18.41753
Ali, D., Fatemi, Y., Boskabadi, E., Nikfar, M., Ugwuoke, J., & Ali, H. (2024). ChatGPT in teaching and learning: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 14(6), Article 643. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060643
Amin, M. Y. M. (2023). AI and ChatGPT in language teaching: Enhancing EFL classroom support and transforming assessment techniques. International Journal of Higher Education Pedagogies, 4(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.33422/ijhep.v4i4.554
Arowosegbe, A., Alqahtani, J. S., & Oyelade, T. (2024). Perception of generative AI use in UK higher education. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1463208. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1463208
Arthur, F., Salifu, I., & Abam Nortey, S. (2024). Predictors of higher education students’ behavioural intention and usage of ChatGPT: The moderating roles of age, gender, and experience. Interactive Learning Environments, 30, 10231-10255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13222-9
Bibi, Z., & Atta, A. (2024). The role of Chat GPT as an AI English writing assistant: A study of students’ perceptions, experiences, and satisfaction level. Annals of Human and Social Sciences, 5(1), 433-443. https://doi.org/10.35484/ahss.2024(5-I)39
Birks, D., & Clare, J. (2023). Linking artificial intelligence facilitated academic misconduct to existing prevention frameworks. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19,Article 20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00142-3
Bonner, E., Lege, R., & Frazier, E. (2023). Large language model-based artificial intelligence in the language classroom: Practical ideas for teaching. Teaching English with Technology, 23(1), 23-41.
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), Article 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Chan, C. K. Y. (2025). Students’ perceptions of ‘AI-g iarism’: Investigating changes in understandings of academic misconduct. Education and Information Technology, 30, 8087-8108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13151-7
Chan, C. K. Y., & Lee, K. K. W. (2023). The AI generation gap: Are Gen Z students more interested in adopting generative AI such as ChatGPT in teaching and learning than their Gen X and millennial generation teachers? Smart Learning Environments, 10, Article 60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00269-3
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Črček, N., & Patekar, J. (2023). Writing with AI: University students’ use of ChatGPT. Journal of Language and Education, 9(4), 128-138. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2023.17379
Damiano, A. D., Lauría, E. J. M., Sarmiento, C., & Zhao, N. (2024). Early perceptions of teaching and learning using generative AI in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 52(3), 346-375. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395241233290
Dillon, A., Chell, G., Al Ameri, N., Alsayed, N., Salem, Y., Turner, M., & Gallagher, K. (2024). The use of large language model tools such as ChatGPT in academic writing in English medium education postgraduate programs: A grounded theory approach. Journal of Educators Online, 21(2), 20-30. https://doi.org/10.9743/jeo.2024.21.2.5
Eke, D. O. (2023). ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI: Threat to academic integrity? Journal of Responsible Technology, 13, Article 100060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2023.100060
Fajt, B., & Schiller, E. (2025). ChatGPT in academia: University students’ attitudes towards the use of ChatGPT and Plagiarism. Journal of Academic Ethics, 23, 1363-1382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-025-09603-5
Farhi F., Jeljeli R., Aburezeq I., Dweikat F. F., Al-shami S. A., & Slamene, R. (2023) Analyzing the students’ views, concerns, and perceived ethics about chat GPT usage. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5(5), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CAEAI.2023.100180
Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2023). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(3), 460-474. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846
Firdaus, A., & Nawaz, S. (2024). Viewpoints of teachers about the usage of artificial intelligence in ELT: Advantages and obstacles. Ughackerzk, 8(I), 82-93. https://doi.org/10.33195/
Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the future of education: Exploring the potential and consequences of AI and ChatGPT in educational settings. Education Sciences, 13(7), Article 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070692
Hasanein, A. M., & Sobih, A. E. (2023). Drivers and consequences of ChatGPT use in higher education: Key stakeholder perspectives. European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education, 13(11), 2599-2614. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13110181
Hassan, A. (2023). The usage of artificial intelligence in education in light of the spread of ChatGPT. In R. El Khoury, & N. Nasrallah (Eds.), Emerging trends and innovation in business and finance. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6101-6_50
Hua, H. H., & Le, T. T. (2024). Exploring the impact of AI in language education: Vietnamese EFL teachers’views on using ChatGPT for fairy tale retelling tasks. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(3), 486-503. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.3.24
Hwang, W. Y., Nurtantyana, R., Purba, S. W. D., Hariyanti, U., Indrihapsari, Y., & Surjono, H. D. (2023). AI and recognition technologies to facilitate English as foreign language writing for supporting personalization and contextualization in authentic contexts. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(5), 1008-1035. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331221137253
Jo, H. (2024). From concerns to benefits: A comprehensive study of ChatGPT usage in education. Internal Technology in Higher Education, 21(35). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00471-4
Karakose T., & Tülübaş T. (2023). How can ChatGPT facilitate teaching and learning: Implications for contemporary education. Education Process, 12(4),7-16. https://doi.org/10.22521/EDUPIJ.2023.124.1
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). Exploring generative artificial intelligence preparedness among university language instructors: A case study. Computers and Education, Artificial Intelligence, 5(100156), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100156
Lambert, J., & Stevens, M. (2023). ChatGPT and generative AI technology: A mixed bag of concerns and new opportunities. Computers in the Schools, 41(4), 559-583. http://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2023.2256710
Li, R. (2024). Current survey of ChatGPT empowering foreign language education. Frontiers in Educational Research, 7(2), 126-130. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2024.070220
Ministry of Education and Training (2025). Circular 02/2025/TT-BGDDT, Regulations on digital competence framework, dated 24/1/2025. https://vanban.chinhphu.vn/?pageid=27160&docid=212648
Mohamed, A. M. (2023). Exploring the potential of an AI-based Chatbot (ChatGPT) in enhancing English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teaching: Perceptions of EFL faculty members. Education and Information Technologies, 29(3), 3195-3217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-02311917-z
Mohammadkarimi, E. (2023) Teachers’ reflections on academic dishonesty in EFL students’ writings in the era of artificial intelligence. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.2.10
Naher, J., Maruf, M. H., Bakht, S. T., & Sadaf, S. S. (2023). A survey to understand the experience of ChatGPT usage among engineering university students in Bangladesh. Technium: Romanian Journal of Applied Sciences and Technology, 15, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.47577/technium.v15i.9660
Ngo, L. C., Tran, T. N., & Nguyen, T. T. (2024). Academic integrity in the age of generative AI: Perceptions and responses of Vietnamese EFL teachers. Teaching English with Technology, 24(1), 28-47. https://doi.org/10.56297/fsyb3031/mxnb7567
Ngo, A. T. T. (2023). The perception by university students of the use of ChatGPT in education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 18(17), 4-19. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i17.39019
Nguyen, H. T. T. (2023). EFL teachers’ perspectives toward the use of ChatGPT in writing classes: A case study at Van Lang University. International Journal of Language Instruction, 2(3), 1-47. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijli.23231
Özkan, E. K., Erdemir, N., & Coşkun, D. (2024). A systematic review of EFL teachers’ perspectives on artificial intelligence technologies. Ihlara Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi 9(2), 150-168. https://doi.org/10.47479/ihead.1535035
Perkins, M. (2023). Academic Integrity considerations of AI large language models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(2), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.02.07
Putra, F., Rangka, I., Aminah, S., & Aditama, M. (2023). ChatGPT in the higher education environment: perspectives from the theory of high order thinking skills. Journal of Public Health (Oxford Academic), 45(4), e840-e841. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdad120
Rad, H. S., & Roohani, A. (2024). Fostering L2 learners’ pronunciation and motivation via affordances of artificial intelligence. Computers in the Schools, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2024.2330427
Shaikh, S., Yayilgan, S. Y., Klimova, B., & Pikhart, M. (2023). Assessing the usability of ChatGPT for formal English language learning. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(9), 1937-1960. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13090140
Slimi, Z., Benayoune, A., & Alemu, A. E. (2025). Students’ perceptions of artificial intelligence integration in higher education. European Journal of Educational Research, 14(2), 471-484. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.14.2.471
Tran, N. T. (2024). Teachers’ experiences with generative AI as co-pilots in high school L2 writing instruction: A case in Vietnam. In H. P. Bui, & E. Namaziandost (Eds.), Innovations in technologies for language teaching and learning. Studies in Computational Intelligence (p. 1159). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-63447-5_8
Vall, R. R. F., & Araya, F. G. (2023). Exploring the benefits and challenges of AI-Language learning tools. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention, 10(1), 7569-7576. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsshi/v10i01.02
Waltzer, T., Pilegard, C., & Heyman, G. D. (2024). Can you spot the bot? Identifying AI-generated writing in college essays. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 20(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00158-310.9743/jeo.2024.21.2.5
Xiao, Y., & Zhi, Y. (2023). An exploratory study of EFL learners’ use of ChatGPT for language learning tasks: Experience and perceptions. Languages, 8(3), Article 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8030212
Xu, J., & Li, J. (2024). Effects of AI affordances on student engagement in EFL classrooms: A structural equation modelling and latent profile analysis. European Journal of Education, 59(4), e12808. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12808
Yang, H., & Kyun, S. (2022). The current research trend of artificial intelligence in language learning: A systematic empirical literature review from an activity theory perspective. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(5), 180-210. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7492
Zaiarna, I., Zhyhadlo, O., & Dunaievska, O. (2024). CHATGPT in foreign language teaching and assessment: Exploring efl instructors’ experience [CHATGPT у навчанні іноземних мов та оцінюванні: досвід викладачів англійської мови]. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 102(4), 176-191. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v102i4.5716
Zhao, X. (2022). Leveraging Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology for English writing: Introducing wordtune as a digital writing assistance for EFL writers. RELC Journal, 54(3), 890-894. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368822210940
Downloads
Received: 08-05-2025Accepted: 02-06-2025Published: 07-09-2025Statistics
Abstract: 684 PDF: 219
FWCI: ---How to Cite
Le, T. T. T. (2025). Generative AI tool usage: The dual-faced experience of the in-service teachers following the MTESOL program. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences, 16(10), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.16.10.4368.2026License
Copyright (c) 2026 Le Thi Thanh Thu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Similar Articles
- Le Thi Thuy Nhung, Nguyen Hoang Thao Nguyen, EFL teachers’ experiences of peer observation in Vietnamese academic institutions , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences: 13 (1) 2023
- Le Hoang Dung, Le Tan Cuong, Pivotal roles of teachers and students in enhancing an active learning environment , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences: 11 (2) 2021
- Dang Thi Thi, Le Van Thinh, Extramural English and Vietnamese EFL primary school students’ listening and reading proficiency in Vietnam , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences: 13 (2) 2023
- Le Thi Thuy Nhung, Tran Doan Vuong Dieu, Impacts of using cartoons as an instructional tool on English communicative skills of young learners at a Vietnamese primary school , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences: 10 (2) 2020
- Tran Bao Lien, Chau Thi Hoang Hoa, Vietnamese high school EFL teachers’ perceptions of teaching cultural contents during the Covid-19 pandemic: A case study at Tra Vinh City , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences: 12 (2) 2022
- Le Thi Thanh Thu, Online learning experience of the master of TESOL students during Covid-19 closures , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences: 10 (2) 2020
- Pham Trung Kien, Vu Thi Hong Van, Vietnamese EFL secondary teachers’ translanguaging use and their perceptions , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences: 13 (2) 2023
- Tran Van Doan, Bui Thi Thuc Quyen, Difficulties encountered by teachers in using storytelling to teach very young learners , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences: 13 (1) 2023
- William D. Magday, Jr., Jerwin F. Memita, Joel T. Abon, Gail G. Gumilet, Alma Bella G. Cablinan, Lhea T. Castro, Jenny Grace E. Gamurot, Elson Boie B. Tumaneng, Enhancing students’ subject-verb agreement skill by using CiCi artificial intelligence-based app: Embedded mixed-methods study , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences: 15(2)2025
- Tai Huu Nguyen, Thu Le Anh Tran, Teachers’ perspectives and practice in using learning approaches to foster learner autonomy in Vietnam , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences: 14(4)2024
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
