Enhancing student engagement in oral presentations through student-constructed rubrics

Authors

  • Pham Quang Binh
    Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Education, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
  • Dinh Thi Thanh Hang
    Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Education, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam

DOI:

10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.16.6.4190.2026

Keywords:

collaborative learning; higher education assessment; oral presentation; student-constructed rubrics; student engagement

Abstract

Oral presentations are essential for university students, as they enhance communication skills and foster critical thinking. However, students often struggle to understand assessment rubrics, which can hinder their engagement and performance. This study investigates the impact of student-constructed rubrics on student engagement in oral presentation tasks. A mixed-methods approach was employed, involving a questionnaire and semi-structured interviews with 33 university students from the Faculty of Foreign Languages. The results indicated a high overall mean score
(M = 3.87) for student engagement, with powerful outcomes in collaborative engagement (M = 4.06) and cognitive engagement
(M = 3.98). Qualitative data highlighted that the rubric construction process fostered stronger peer relationships, improved understanding of presentation expectations, and increased motivation among participants. Students reported feeling empowered and more responsible for their learning. The findings suggest that involving students in the design of rubrics enhances their engagement across social, cognitive, behavioral, collaborative, and emotional dimensions. This study highlights the significance of university students' participation in formative assessment processes in creating a more student-centred and inclusive learning environment. It provides practical recommendations for educators to facilitate the construction of rubrics, thereby fostering a more supportive and engaging learning environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alonzo, D., Davison, C., & Sahlberg, P. (2023). Assessment for equity: The role of formative assessment. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Educational assessment: The influence of Paul Black on research, pedagogy and practice (pp. 143-162). Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350288522.ch-10

Amirian, S. M. R., & Tavakoli, E. (2016). Academic oral presentation self-efficacy: A cross-sectional interdisciplinary comparative study. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(6), 1095-1110. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1160874

Andrade, H. G. (2005). Teaching with rubrics: The good, the bad, and the ugly. College Teaching, 53(1), 27-31. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.53.1.27-31

Andrade, H. L., & Du, Y. (2005). Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(3), 1-11.

Bacchus, R., & Wallace, J. (2024). Peer assessment using student co-designed rubrics. Creative Education, 15(2), 164-177. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2024.152009

Downloads

Received: 02-03-2025
Accepted: 02-05-2025
Published: 20-07-2025

Statistics Views

Abstract: 479
PDF: 80

How to Cite

Pham, Q. B., & Dinh, T. T. H. (2025). Enhancing student engagement in oral presentations through student-constructed rubrics. HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - SOCIAL SCIENCES, 16(6), 94–115. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.16.6.4190.2026