Artificial intelligence tools: A double-edged sword for student writing in higher education

Authors

DOI:

10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.16.10.3960.2026

Keywords:

academic writing; AI Tools; chatGPT; critical thinking; grammarly; mixed-methods approach; Philippines; student perceptions; writing skills

Abstract

Enthusiasm and apprehension often accompany the rise of new technologies like Artificial Intelligence (AI), which present risks and opportunities for individuals and communities. Using a mixed-method approach, this study investigated the potential impact of AI tools, specifically ChatGPT and Grammarly, on participants’ essay-writing skills. It specifically examined whether there is a significant difference between entry and exit writing performance when participants are assisted with AI tools in their writing activities, and the participants’ perceptions of the impact of AI tools on their writing skills. Purposively selected participants were those enrolled in the English Syntax course. While entry and exit mean scores (M = 76.2, SD = 5.4; M = 77.1, SD = 5.6, respectively) indicated minimal improvement with a p-value of 0.148, showing no statistically significant changes in writing performance, qualitative data revealed four themes on perceived Impacts of AI tools on Writing Skills: (1) Enhancement of writing skills, (2) Improvement in writing habits and confidence, (3) Loss of independent and critical thinking skills, and (4) Induction of confusion and frustration.  The findings imply that AI tools are a double-edged sword for student writing; thus, there’s a need for careful integration of AI in writing education to ensure it enhances, rather than replaces, human critical thinking. Further research is recommended to explore the long-term cognitive effects of AI on student writing development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alhumaid, K. (2019). Four ways technology has negatively changed education. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 9(4), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2019-0002

Baker, M. J., Ahmed, S., & Jones, L. (2022). Exploring the optimal duration for AI-supported learning in educational settings. Educational Research Review, 18(4), 331-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100380

Bašić, Ž., Banovac, A., Kružić, I., & Jerković, I. (2023). Better by you, better than me? ChatGPT-3 as writing assistance in students’ essays. AI & Society, 39(1), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.04536

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brown, A. (2023). The impact of AI on cognitive processes: A critical examination. Journal of Educational Psychology, 29(4), 314-332. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000537

Downloads

Received: 03-01-2025
Accepted: 01-07-2025
Published: 07-09-2025

Statistics

Abstract: 712
PDF: 15

FWCI: ---

How to Cite

Villaflor, G. W., & Deiparine, M. S. (2025). Artificial intelligence tools: A double-edged sword for student writing in higher education. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences, 16(10), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.16.10.3960.2026

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.