The impact of ChatGPT on research and learning methods of university students in Ho Chi Minh City
Authors
-
Truong Tan Dat
Dong Thap University, Dong Thap Province, Viet Namhttps://orcid.org/0009-0002-9719-9484
- Pham Hong Quang
Thai Nguyen University, Thai Nguyen, Viet Nam- Tran Quoc Giang tranquocgiang29894@gmail.com
Dong Thap University, Dong Thap Province, Viet Namhttps://orcid.org/0009-0007-9489-9107DOI:
10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.16.4.3835.2026Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence (AI); ChatGPT; critical thinking; learning methods; research skills; students in Ho Chi Minh CityAbstract
This study examines the impact of ChatGPT on learning and research methods among university students in Ho Chi Minh City, employing a mixed-methods design. Data were collected from 577 participants, including students, lecturers, and educational administrators, via surveys and 28 in-depth interviews. Modern statistical techniques and content analysis ensured comprehensive and objective results. Over 70% of students found ChatGPT helpful for rapid information retrieval and enhancing learning efficiency, while around 65% indicated that it improved writing skills, particularly in grammar checking and idea organization. However, 60% expressed concerns that excessive reliance on ChatGPT might diminish critical thinking and creativity. Lecturers and administrators also raised issues regarding the verification of information and adherence to academic ethics. The study emphasizes that while ChatGPT can support academic tasks, it should be used in conjunction with strategies that promote independent thinking and creativity. Recommendations include skill training, establishing clear usage policies, and integrating ChatGPT into curricula to optimize its benefits and sustain academic development, aligning with global trends in AI-enhanced higher education. The results offer valuable global insights.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.References
Adiguzel, T., Kaya, M. H., & Cansu, F. K. (2023). Revolutionizing education with AI: Exploring the transformative potential of ChatGPT. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3), 415-429. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13152
Ali, J. K. M., Shamsan, M. A. A., Hezam, T. A., & Mohammed, A. A. Q. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learning motivation: Teachers and students’ voices. Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix, 2(1), 35-51. https://doi.org/10.56540/jesaf.v2i1.51
Alshammari, S. H., & Alshammari, M. H. (2024). Factors affecting the adoption and use of ChatGPT in higher education. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 20(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.339557
Ausat, A. M. A., Massang, B., Efendi, M., Nofirman, N., & Riady, Y. (2023). Can ChatGPT replace the role of the teacher in the classroom: A fundamental analysis. Journal on Education, 5(4), 65-80. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i4.2745
Baidoo-Anu, D., & Ansah, L. O. (2023). Education in the era of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4337484
Bansal, G., Chamola, V., Hussain, A., Shanu, S., & Goyal, A. (2024). Transforming conversations with AI-A comprehensive study of ChatGPT. Cognitive Computation, 16(2), 511-541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-023-10236-2
Bower, M., Torrington, J., Lai, J. W. M., Burton, L., & Chen, Y. (2024). How should we change teaching and assessment in response to increasingly powerful generative Artificial Intelligence? Outcomes of the ChatGPT teacher survey. Education and Information Technologies, 29(5), 33-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12405-0
Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). Future research recommendations for transforming higher education with generative AI. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6(3), 185-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100197
Dang, E. V., Nguyen, P. D. L., & Nguyen, H. T. (2024). The current status of ChatGPT application in learning and research of students at Ho Chi Minh City National University. Journal of Education, 24(1), 36-41.
Duong, L. T. (2023). Application of ChatGPT in promoting higher education teaching and learning in the era of Artificial Intelligence. Binh Duong University Journal of Science and Technology, 6(2), 153-160. https://doi.org/10.56097/binhduonguniversityjournalofscienceandtechnology.v6i2.160
Emma, S., & Valentini, A. (2023). ChatGPT and artificial intelligence in higher education: Quick start guide (Report No. ED/HE/IESALC/IP/2023/12). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385146
Firaina, R., & Sulisworo, D. (2023). Exploring the usage of ChatGPT in higher education: Frequency and impact on productivity. BEI Journal, 2(1), 39-46.
García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2023). The perception of artificial intelligence in educational contexts after the launch of ChatGPT: Disruption or panic. Education in the Knowledge Society, 24(3), 262-279. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.31279
Gomez, S. C., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). DigComp 2.1: The digital competence framework for citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. Publications Office of the European Union.
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., & Hüllermeier, E. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103(4), 260-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kirtania, D. K. (2023). OpenAI ChatGPT for Library and Information Science (LIS) professionals. SSRN Electronic Journal, 20(3), 18-24. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4404903
Le, P. T. (2024). ChatGPT in learning and research: Perspectives from lecturers and students of universities in Da Nang City. Vinh University Journal of Science, 155-162. https://doi.org/10.56824/vujs.2024.htkhgd36
Liu, Y., Chen, L., & Yao, Z. (2022). The application of artificial intelligence assistant to deep learning in teachers’ teaching and students’ learning processes. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(2) , 885-874. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.885874
Luo, J. (2024). A critical review of GenAI policies in higher education assessment: A call to reconsider the “originality” of students’ work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(5), 651-664. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2309963
McGee, R. W. (2023). Is ChatGPT biased against conservatives? An empirical study. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4359405
Mhlanga, D. (2023). Open AI in education, the responsible and ethical use of ChatGPT towards lifelong learning. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4354422
Miyazaki, K., Murayama, T., Uchiba, T., Kitanishi, K., Shiro, T., Nakano, T., & Ikeda, K. (2024). Public perception of generative AI on Twitter: An empirical study based on occupation and usage. EPJ Data Science, 13(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00445-y
Ngo, A. T. T. (2023). The perception by university students of the use of ChatGPT in education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(17), 4-19. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i17.39019
Nguyen, H. T. P. (2023). Current status of using ChatGPT for writing practice by students. Journal of Science and Technology - Thai Nguyen University, 229(12), 260-269.
Nguyen, H. T. T. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on educational activities through the literature review method. Hoa Sen University Journal of Science, 2(2), 52-59.
Nguyen, N. D., Tran, P. T., Tran, V. P., Pham, A. Q., Le, N. H. N., & Duong, G. D. (2024). The current status of ChatGPT application in learning of students of the Faculty of Engineering and Technology - Hue University. Hong Bang International University Journal of Science, 50-59. https://doi.org/10.59294/HIUJS.KHQG.2024.005
Nguyen, P. T. (2023). Research on students’ attitudes and perceptions when using ChatGPT to learn English. Vietnam Journal of Educational Sciences, 19(5), 58-63.
Nguyen, P. T. (2023). Using ChatGPT as a support tool in teaching and learning in communication disciplines. Journal of Science, Hong Bang International University, 25, 95-100. https://doi.org/10.59294/HIUJS.25.2023.507
Nguyen, Q. P. (2023). ChatGPT supports self-learning and digital competency development for youth. In Proceedings of the 2nd Scientific Conference for Young Cadres of National Universities and Expanded Regional Universities (pp. 232-237). Hue University. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374447502_ChatGPT_supports_self-learning_and_development_of_digital_competence_for_youth
Nguyen, V. T. T., & Le, N. T. M. (2024). Research on applying ChatGPT to improve learning efficiency for students majoring in economics at Ho Chi Minh City University of Industry in the technology era. Journal of Education Management, 16(9), 12-21. https://doi.org/10.53750/jem24.v16.n9.12
OpenAI. (2023). Introducing ChatGPT. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2006). Critical thinking: Learn the tools the best thinkers use. Pearson Prentice Hall.
Ray, P. P. (2023). ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations, and future scope. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 3, 121-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003
Stahl, B. C., & Eke, D. (2024). The ethics of ChatGPT - Exploring the ethical issues of an emerging technology. International Journal of Information Management, 7(3), 88-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102700
Tate, T. P., Doroudi, S., Ritchie, D., Xu, Y., & Uci, M. W. (2023). Educational research and AI-generated writing: Confronting the coming tsunami. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/4mec3
Taecharungroj, V. (2023). What can ChatGPT do? Analyzing early reactions to the innovative AI chatbot on Twitter. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 7(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7010035
Tlili, A., Shehailia, M., Alowayr, A., Agyemang, F. O., Bozalek, V., Boufarès, F., & Huang, R. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 380-396. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
Thai, T. T. C. (2023). Attitudes and expectations of English language pedagogy students towards ChatGPT: A study at Hanoi National University of Education. Journal of Education, 23(10), 51-56.
Thorp, H. H. (2023). ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science, 37(3), 313-314. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg7879
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Received: 07-11-2024Accepted: 17-12-2024Published: 15-01-2025Statistics Views
Abstract: 1447 PDF: 0How to Cite
Truong, D. T., Pham, Q. H., & Tran, G. Q. (2025). The impact of ChatGPT on research and learning methods of university students in Ho Chi Minh City. HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - SOCIAL SCIENCES, 16(4), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.16.4.3835.2026License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dat Tan Truong; Quang Hong Pham; Giang Quoc Tran

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Pham Hong Quang
