Predicting factors impacting EFL students’ writing competence: Examining the moderating effects of personal characteristics
Authors
-
Phe Quang Chu
cq.phe@ufm.edu.vn
University of Finance - Marketing, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Namhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6811-1538
- Trang Hoang Trang
University of Finance - Marketing, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Namhttps://orcid.org/0009-0006-8637-8742- Dao Thi Anh Vo
University of Finance - Marketing, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet NamDOI:
10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.15.2.3644.2025Keywords:
collaborative learning; collaborative writing; English as a foreign language; SCLT; writing competenceAbstract
This paper quantitatively predicts the factors that impact English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students’ Writing Competence (WC), examining the multiple-level effects of three independent constructs (Environmental Factors [EF], Personal Beliefs [BL], Behavioral Factors [BF]) and three moderating variables (gender, academic performance, and self-study time) on EFL students’ WC. The questionnaire was delivered to 85 EFL students at a university in Vietnam, and the findings show that the SRMR index of the estimated model is .46, meaning a good fit. Hypothesis testing validated the positive causality between the exogenous constructs and their corresponding endogenous ones. In the direct relations, EF affects BL the most (75.1%), BF impacts WC (69.3%), and finally, BL influences BF the least (38.4%). In the indirect relations, EF affects WC the most (55.1%), then EF influences BF (28.9%) and finally, BL impacts WC the least (26.6%). The analytical result also revealed the moderating effect of gender on the relation between BF and WC. Still, the moderation of academic performance and self-study time on the relation between BF and WC was rejected. Finally, the authors discuss some major administrative measures to target if stakeholders wish to improve EFL students’ WC.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.References
Abrantes, J. L., Seabra, C., & Lages, L. F. (2007). Pedagogical affect, student interest, and learning performance. Journal of Business Research, 60(9), 960-964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.10.026
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Process, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Alawaji, N. N. M. (2020). Students’ perceptions of collaborative summary writing. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10(6), 700-707. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1006.11
Alsayed, M. (2003). Factors that contribute to success in learning english as a foreign language. Damascus University Journal, 9(1+2), 21-44.
Anshu, A. H., & Yesuf, M. Y. (2020). Effects of collaborative writing on EFL students’ paragraph writing performance: Focus on content and coherence. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 1(10), 36-37. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v
Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. Annals of Child Development, 6, 1-60.
Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory for personal and social change by enabling media. In P. Schmuck & P. Dortrecht (Eds.), Psychology of sustainable development schmuck (pp. 209-238). Kluer.
Bandura, A. (2009). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3(3), 265-299. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03
Bembenutty, H., White, M. C., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2016). Applying social cognitive theory in the development of self-regulated competencies throughout K-12 grades. In A. P. Lipnevich (Ed.), Psychosocial skills and school systems in the 21st century. The Springer series on human exceptionality (pp. 215-239). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28606-8_9
Blasco-Arcas, L., Buil, I., Hernández-Ortega, B., & Sese, F. J. (2013). Using clickers in class: The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning, and engagement in learning performance. Computers & Education, 62, 102-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j
Brockett, R. G., & Hiemstra, R. (1991). Self-direction in adult learning: Perspectives on theory, research, and practice. Routledge.
Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (4th ed.). Longman.
Callum, K. F. C. (2011). Influences on the adoption of mobile technology by students and teachers [Doctoral dissertation]. Massey University.
Chu, P. Q. (2022). Exploring different factors affecting students’ success in studying business English writing. Journal of Inquiry into Languages and Cultures, 6(3), 316-330.
Chu, P. Q. (2023). Exploring the effects of collaborative peer written corrective feedback on EFL students’ business english writing performance. Journal of Knowledge Learning and Science Technology, 2(3), 189-211. https://doi.org/10.60087/jklst.vol2.n3.p211
Chu, P. Q., & Nguyen, T. H. (2020). Exploring different factors affecting economics majors’ success in studying English. In The 5th International Conference on English language teaching (pp. 39-60). VNU-HCM Press.
Chu, P. Q., & Nguyen, T. H. (2022). Exploring different factors affecting students’ success in studying business English writing. Journal of Inquiry into Languages and Cultures, 6(3), 316-330.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design (4th ed.). Sage Publicaction.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Duwal, B., & Khonju, L. (2020). Factors affecting students’ academic performance: The case of students at community colleges in Bhaktapur District. The International Research Journal of Management Science, 5(1), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.3126/irjms.v5i
El-Omari, A. H. (2016). Factors affecting students’ achievement in English language learning. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 6(2), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2016.v6n2p9
Engin, A. O., & Seven, M. A. (2007). Factors which affect the success in English teaching in Turkey (Online Report: ERIC - ED497452). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED497452.pdf
Hair, J. F., Hunt, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on the Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications.
Helaluddin, Nurhayati, Nadya, N. L., Ismail, G., Guntur, M., & Fransori, A. (2023). The use of collaborative strategies to improve students’ writing ability and self-efficacy: A mixed method study. European Journal of Educational Research, 12(1), 265-280. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.1.265
Huynh, T. N. (2022). The effects of peer feedback on EFL students’ writing performance. Vietnam Journal of Education, 6(2), 123-136. https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2022.185
Kennedy, D., Hyland, A., & Ryan, N. (2006). Writing and using learning outcomes: A practical guide. Implementing Bologna in your Institution, 1-28.
Khatib, M., & Meihami, H. (2015). Languaging and writing skill: The effect of collaborative writing on EFL students’ writing performance. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(1), 203-211. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.1p.203
Li, Y. (2023). The effect of online collaborative writing instruction on enhancing writing performance, writing motivation, and writing self-efficacy of Chinese EFL learners. Frontier Psychology, 14(1), 165-221. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1165221
Limp, T. & Alves, R. A. (2017). Relating beliefs in writing skill malleability to writing performance: The mediating role of achievement goals and self-efficacy. Journal of Writing Research, 9(2), 97-125. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2017.09.02.01
Lin, O. P., & Maarof, N. (2013). Collaborative writing in summary writing: Student perceptions and problems (Procedia - Social and behavioral sciences). In 6th International Conference on University Learning and Teaching (InCULT 2012) (Vol. 90, pp. 599-606). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.131
Martín, J. L. O., Hameleers, I. B., Trujillo-Torres, J. M., & Moreno-Guerrero, A. J. (2020). A comparison between collaborative and individual writings in promoting motivation and language acquisition. Sustainability, MIDP, 12(19), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197959
McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2003). Factors that differentiate underachieving gifted students from high achieving gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(2), 144-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620304700205
MOET. (2015). Decision No 730/QĐ-BGDĐT : Tài liệu hướng dẫn áp dụng Định dạng đề thi đánh giá năng lực sử dụng tiếng Anh từ bậc 3 đến bậc 5 theo Khung năng lực ngoại ngữ 6 bậc dùng cho Việt Nam trong việc xây dựng đề thi và chấm thi [Decision No. 730/QĐ-BGDĐT: Guidelines for applying the test format for assessing English language proficiency from levels 3 to 5 Based on the Vietnam 6-Level foreign language proficiency framework in test development and grading]. http://ntc.moet.gov.vn/sites/default/files/2021-04/Huong %20dan%20thuc%20hien%20Thong%20tu%2023%20-%20Thi%20Ngoai%20ngu%20-%20CV%201807.pdf
MOET. (2021). Quy chế đào tạo đại học (Ban hành kèm theo Thông tư số 08/2021/TT-BGDĐT) [Regulations on undergraduate education issued with Circular 08/2021/TT-BGDĐT)]. https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Giao-duc/Thong-tu-08-2021-TT-BGDDT-Quy-che-dao-tao-trinh-do-dai-hoc-470013.aspx
Mushtaq, I., & Khan, S. N. (2012). Factors affecting students’ academic performance. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(9), 16-22.
Nabavi, R. T. (2012). Bandura’s social learning theory & SCLT. https://davidamerland.com/ images/pdf/BandurasTheory.pdf
Nguyen, Q., & Le, T. T. K. (2018). Using the ordered Logit to assess students’ English learning outcomes at state-owned universities in Ho Chi Minh City. Journal of Education, 444(2), 48-54.
Nguyen, T. H., & Chu, P. Q. (2021). Estimating university students’ acceptance of technological tools for studying English through the UTAUT model. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 1(3), 209-234. https://doi.org/10.11250/ijte.01.03.012
Nguyen, T. T. T., & Phuong, Y. H. (2021). The impacts of collaborative writing on EFL students’ paragraph writing performance. International Journal of Science and Management Studies (IJSMS), 4(4), 177-190. https://doi.org/10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v4i4p117
Oxford. (2019). Oxford English learner’s dictionary (1.0.2) [Online version]. https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/
Pajares, F., Prestin, A., Chen, J., & Nabi, R. N. (2009). Social cognitive theory and mass media effects. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/bookchapters/3
Pervaiz, A., Batool, N., & Zahra, K. (2018). Exploring the differences of motivational factors among undergraduate english as a second language students in Pakistan: A descriptive study. Center for Languages and Transitional Studies, 60-73.
Pham, H. V. P. (2021). The effects of collaborative writing on students’ writing fluency:
An efficient framework for collaborative writing. SAGE Open, 11(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244021998363Phan, H. L. T., & Dao, P. (2023). Engagement in collaborative writing: Exploring learners’ control of task content and text quality. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33, 242-259. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12462
Putzeys, K., Van Keer, H., & De Wever, B. (2024). Unknown is not chosen: University student voices on group formation for collaborative writing. Education Science, 14(31), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010031
Qureshi, M. A., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J. A., Raza, S. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2021). Factors affecting students’ learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1884886
Rahman, H. A., Rajab, A., Wahab, S. R. A., Nor, F. M., & Zarina, W. (2017). Factors affecting motivation in language learning. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 7(7), 543-547. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2017.7.7.927
Ramirez‐Arellano, A., Acosta‐Gonzaga, E., Bory‐Reyes, J., & Hernández‐Simón, L. M. (2018). Factors affecting student learning performance: A causal model in higher blended education. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jc
Sarwar, B., Zulfiqar, S., Aziz, S., & Chandia, K. E. (2019). Usage of social media tools for collaborative learning: The effect on learning success with the moderating role of cyberbullying. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(11), 246-279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117748415
Storch, N. (2011). Critical feedback on written corrective feedback research. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 29-46. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes.10.2.119181
Thai, T. N. H., & Nguyen, N. T. (2022). The impact of collaborative writing via Padlet on students’ writing performance and their attitudes. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science, 17(2), 25-39. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUSJ
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. Management Information Systems Review, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i5
Downloads
Received: 13-08-2024Accepted: 27-09-2024Published: 18-10-2024Statistics Views
Abstract: 309 PDF: 241How to Cite
Chu, P. Q., Trang, T. H., & Vo, D. T. A. (2024). Predicting factors impacting EFL students’ writing competence: Examining the moderating effects of personal characteristics. HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - SOCIAL SCIENCES, 15(2), 180–196. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.15.2.3644.2025License
Copyright (c) 2024 Phe Quang Chu; Trang Hoang Trang; Dao Thi Anh Vo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Trang Hoang Trang
