The relationship between the degree of adopting human resource change leadership role and human resource attribution in sustainable enterprises

Authors

  • Diem Thi Pham
    Ho Chi Minh City Open University, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
  • Tran Phuc Truong Nguyen
    Long An Provincial Party Committee Office, Long An, Viet Nam

DOI:

10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.15.3.3608.2025

Keywords:

change leadership role; HR attribution; HR role; performance HR attribution; well-being HR attribution

Abstract

Building positive employee beliefs, perceptions, and attitudes is critical for successful change interventions. Thus, this study aims to investigate the relationship between human resource change leadership role and employee human resource attribution in sustainable enterprises, which relates to the changes in institutional logic and works. The study builds the research model by drawing from attribution theory (Weiner, 1985) and HR attribution (Nishii et al., 2008). It explores this relationship by employing the mixed method of qualitative and quantitative research. Qualitative methods (in-depth interviews) adjust the scales, while quantitative methods test scales, researching hypotheses and models. Utilizing a sample of 1,058 employees from 24 sustainable enterprises in Viet Nam, the study employs the PLS-SEM method for analysis. The findings show that HR change leadership roles significantly positively affect the well-being of HR attribution. At the same time, the degree of adoption of HR change leadership roles hurts performance HR attribution. In addition, it explores a U-shaped relationship between the adoption of HR change leadership roles and performance HR attribution, highlighting the complex nature of HR attribution in sustainable organizations. This implies that employees may interpret the same sustainable policies or programs differently based on their characteristics and experiences. Therefore, HR departments should tailor their sustainable practices according to employees’ diverse needs and perceptions to foster positive attributions and minimize negative attribution, contributing to sustainable progress.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alfes, K., Veld, M., & Fürstenberg, N. (2020). The relationship between perceived high‐performance work systems, combinations of human resource well-being and human resource performance attributions and engagement. Human Resource Management Journal, 31(4), 729-752. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12310

Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411

Armenakis, A. A., & Bedeian, A. G. (1999). Organizational change: A review of theory and research in the 1990s. Journal of Management, 25(1), 293-315.

Bacon, N., & Blyton, P. (2005). Worker responses to team working: Exploring employee attributions of managerial motives. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(2), 238-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/0958519042000311426

Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 17(3), 303-316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124189017003004

Downloads

Received: 31-07-2024
Accepted: 04-09-2024
Published: 30-12-2024

Statistics Views

Abstract: 457
PDF: 322

How to Cite

Pham, D. T., & Nguyen, T. P. T. (2024). The relationship between the degree of adopting human resource change leadership role and human resource attribution in sustainable enterprises. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences, 15(3), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.15.3.3608.2025

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.