Blended learning in higher education: Correlating teaching presence, student engagement, and satisfaction
Authors
-
Venson Ray Felicia Olaguer
Biliran Province State University, Biliran, Philippineshttps://orcid.org/0009-0009-5054-6195
- Shada Marie Mecaydor Marcos
Biliran Province State University, Biliran, Philippineshttps://orcid.org/0009-0001-0316-1059- Roanne Aguipo Solayao
Biliran Province State University, Biliran, Philippineshttps://orcid.org/0009-0004-6132-6079- Eden Rose Brignas Pelaez
Biliran Province State University, Biliran, Philippineshttps://orcid.org/0009-0004-6155-2818- Kevin Taer Lagat kt.lagat@bipsu.edu.ph
Biliran Province State University, Biliran, Philippineshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1272-5653DOI:
10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.16.2.3456.2026Keywords:
blended learning; higher education; satisfaction; student engagement; teaching presenceAbstract
Blended learning is a new modality for most public higher education institutions in the Philippines. Thus, limited studies have examined the teaching-learning dynamics of the classroom in this context. This study sought to determine the levels of teaching presence, student engagement, and satisfaction among undergraduate students in teacher education programs at a state university adapting a blended learning environment and to correlate these variables to examine how they are associated. Using three standardized questionnaires, data were collected from 419 randomly selected undergraduate teacher education students using a descriptive-correlational research design. The data gathered were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics such as mean, standard deviation, and Pearson r correlation. Results revealed high levels of teaching presence (M = 4.09), student engagement
(M = 3.97), and student satisfaction (M = 3.76) among respondents, suggesting that students felt well-guided, engaged, and satisfied with the blended learning modality. Moreover, this study found a strong positive correlation among these variables, indicating that higher teaching presence enhances student engagement and satisfaction, and increased engagement leads to greater satisfaction. These findings corroborate earlier research emphasizing the critical roles of teaching presence and student engagement in student satisfaction, underscoring their importance in implementing blended learning effectively. The study recommends strategies to enhance blended learning in higher education further.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.References
Adams, D., Tan, M. H., Sumintono, B., & Oh, S. P. (2020). Blended learning engagement in higher education institutions: A differential item functioning analysis of students’ backgrounds. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 17(1), 133-158. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2020.17.1.6
Akoglu, H. (2018). User’s guide to correlation coefficients. Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine, 18(3), 91-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001
Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Assessing metacognition in an online community of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 183-190. https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.iheduc.2011.01.005
Al Awamleh, A. (2020). Students’ satisfaction on blended learning in the School of Sport Sciences. Annals of Applied Sport Science, 8(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.29252 /aassjournal.803
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2010). Classroom differences: Online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED529952.pdf
Alvarez, Jr., A. (2020). Learning from the problems and challenges in blended learning: Basis for faculty development and program enhancement. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), 112-132. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4292631
Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Online Learning, 5(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875
Boelens, R., De Wever, B., & Voet, M. (2017). Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 22(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.06.001
Borup, J., Graham, C. R., West, R. E., Archambault, L., & Spring, K. J. (2020). Academic communities of engagement: An expansive lens for examining support structures in blended and online learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(2), 807-832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09744-x
Chen, W. S., & Yao, A. Y. T. (2016). An empirical evaluation of critical factors influencing learner satisfaction in blended learning: A pilot study. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(7), 1667-1671. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040719
Childers, C., & Boatwright, B. (2020). Do digital natives recognize digital influence? Generational differences and understanding of social media influencers. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 42(4), 425-442. https://doi.org/10. 1080/10641734.2020.1830893
Commission on Higher Education (CHED). (2020). CMO, NO.4, S. 2020. https://ched.gov.ph/2022-ched-memorandum-orders/
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.
Curtis, E. A., Comiskey, C., & Dempsey, O. (2016). Importance and use of correlational research. Nurse Researcher, 23(6), 20-25. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2016.e1382
D’Mello, S., Lehman, B., Pekrun, R., & Graesser, A. (2014). Confusion can be beneficial for learning. Learning and Instruction, 29(1), 153-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.05.003
de Brito Lima, F., Lautert, S. L., & Gomes, A. S. (2021). Contrasting levels of student engagement in blended and non-blended learning scenarios. Computers & Education, 172(9), 104241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104241
Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: The new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186 /s41239-017-0087-5
Elmaadaway, M. A. (2017). The effects of a flipped classroom approach on class engagement and skill performance in a blackboard course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 479-491. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12553
El-Sayad, G., Md Saad, N. H., & Thurasamy, R. (2021). How higher education students in Egypt perceived online learning engagement and satisfaction during the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Computers in Education, 8(4), 527-550. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s40692-021-00191-y
Esteban-Millat, I., Martínez-López, F. J., Huertas-García, R., Meseguer, A., & Rodríguez-Ardura, I. (2014). Modelling students’ flow experiences in an online learning environment. Computers & Education, 71(1), 111-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.012
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071
Gray, J. A., & DiLoreto, M. (2016). The effects of student engagement, student satisfaction, and perceived learning in online learning environments. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 11(1), 1-20. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1103654
Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2019). Learner engagement in blended learning environments:
A conceptual framework. Online Learning, 23(2), 145-178. https://doi.org/10.24059 /olj.v23i2.1481
Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S., & Bélisle, M. (2021). An examination of teachers’ strategies to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00260-3
Hosler, K. A., & Arend, B. D. (2012). The importance of course design, feedback, and facilitation: Student perceptions of the relationship between teaching presence and cognitive presence. Educational Media International, 49(3), 217-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2012.738014
Hung, M. L., & Chou, C. (2015). Students’ perceptions of instructors’ roles in blended and online learning environments: A comparative study. Computers & Education, 81(2), 315-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.022
Ja’ashan, M. M. N. H. (2015). Perceptions and attitudes towards blended learning for English courses: A case study of students at University of Bisha. English Language Teaching, 8(9), 40-50. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n9p40
Kang, M., Liew, B. T., Kim, J., & Park, Y. (2014). Learning presence as a predictor of achievement and satisfaction in online learning environments. International Journal on E-Learning, 13(2), 193-208. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/39342/
Kanwar, A., & Sanjeeva, M. (2022). Student satisfaction survey: A key for quality improvement in the Higher Education Institution. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 11(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-022-00196-6
Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G., & Yilmaz, R. (2021). Learning analytics intervention improves students’ engagement in online learning. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27(2), 449-460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09547-w
Kaur, P., Stoltzfus, J., & Yellapu, V. (2018). Descriptive statistics. International Journal of Academic Medicine, 4(1), 60-63. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijam.ijam718
Kintu, M. J., & Zhu, C. (2016). Student characteristics and learning outcomes in a blended learning environment intervention in a Ugandan University. Electronic Journal of
e-Learning, 14(3), 181-195. https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejel/article/view/1754
Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: The relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186 /s41239-017-0043-4
Ladyshewsky, R. K. (2013). Instructor presence in online courses and student satisfaction. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2013.070113
Lagat, K. (2020). Education amidst Covid-19 disruption: Perceived difficulty in implementing flexible learning strategies of teacher education faculty members in a state university. Philippine Social Science Journal, 3(3), 142-150. https://doi.org/10.52006/main.v3i3.264
Larson, M. P., & Linnell, J. (2023). Are students coming to class prepared? The importance of pre-class learning in a flipped classroom. Issues in Accounting Education, 38(3), 183-205. https://doi.org/10.2308/issues-2021-099
Lorenzo, A. R. (2016). Effectiveness of the computer and internet literacy project in public high schools of Tarlac Province, Philippines. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 15(2), 38-46. https://files.eric.ed.gov/ fulltext/EJ1096459.pdf
Manwaring, K. C., Larsen, R., Graham, C. R., Henrie, C. R., & Halverson, L. R. (2017). Investigating student engagement in blended learning settings using experience sampling and structural equation modeling. The Internet and Higher Education, 35(4), 21-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.06.002
Martin, F., Wu, T., Wan, L., Xie, K. (2022). A meta-analysis of the community of inquiry presences and learning outcomes in online and blended learning environments. Online Learning, 26(1), 325-359. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i1.2604
McDonald, P. L. (2012). Adult learners and blended learning: A phenomenographic study of variation in adult learners’ experiences of blended learning in Higher Education. [Doctoral dissertation, George Washington University]. ProQuest Dissertation and Theses database.
Naaj, M. A., Nachouki, M., & Ankit, A. (2012). Evaluating student satisfaction with blended learning in a gender-segregated environment. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 11(1), 185-200. https://doi.org/10.28945/1692
Nixon, R. S., Toerien, R., & Luft, J. A. (2019). Knowing more than their students: Characterizing secondary science teachers’ subject matter knowledge. School Science and Mathematics, 119(3), 150-160. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12323
Oducado, R. M. F. (2020). Survey instrument validation rating scale. https://doi. org/10.13140/RG.2.2.25263.59040
Official Gazette. (n.d.). Republic Act No. 10173. Data Privacy Act of 2012. Official dazette of the Republic of the Philippines. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2012/08/15/republic-act-no-10173/
Panes, L. L. (2019). Dimensions of learners’ satisfaction in the delivery of instruction in blended learning program in Teacher Education Institutions. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(3), 865-881. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2019.43.865881
Park, C., & Kim, D. (2020). Perception of intructor presence and its effects on learning experience in online classes. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 19(1), 475-488. https://doi.org/10.28945/4611
Rahman, N. A., Hussein, N., & Aluwi, A. H. (2015). Satisfaction on blended learning in a public higher education institution: What factors matter? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211(11), 768-775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.107
Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1721-1731. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.compedu.2010.07.017
Shea, P., Li, C. S., Swan, K., & Pickett, A. (2019). Developing learning community in online asynchronous college courses: The role of teaching presence. Online learning, 9(4), 59-82. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v9i4.1779
Small, F., Dowell, D., & Simmons, P. (2012). Teacher communication preferred over peer interaction. Journal of International Education in Business, 5(2), 114-128. https://doi.org/10.1108/18363261211281735
Stone, C., & Springer, M. (2019). Interactivity, connectedness and “teacher-presence”: Engaging and retaining students online. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 59(2),146-169. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.592198797344699
Su, F., Zou, D., & Wang, L. (2023). Student engagement and teaching presence in blended learning and emergency remote teaching. Journal on Computer and Education, 11(2), 445-470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00263-1
Svanum, S., & Aigner, C. (2011). The influences of course effort, mastery and performance goals, grade expectancies, and earned course grades on student ratings of course satisfaction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 667-679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2010.02011.x
Swan, K., & Shih, L. F. (2019). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Online Learning, 9(3), 115-136. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v9i3. 1788
Tomaro, Q. P. V. (2018). ICT integration in the educational system of Philippines. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 5(3), 259-282. http://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.5399
Torres Martín, C., Acal, C., El Honrani, M., & Mingorance Estrada, Á. (2021). Impact on the virtual learning environment due to Covid-19. Sustainability, 13(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020582
Trusz, S. (2020). Why do females choose to study humanities or social sciences, while males prefer technology or science? some intrapersonal and interpersonal predictors. Social Psychology of Education, 23(3), 615-639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-020-09551-5
Vaughan, N. D. (2010). A blended community of inquiry approach: Linking student engagement and course redesign. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1/2), 60-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.007
Villanueva, J. A. R. (2021). Teaching presence in K-12 blended learning classes under the alternative delivery mode. International Journal on Open and Distance E-Learning, 7(1), 31-52. https://ijodel.upou.edu.ph/index.php/ijodel/article/view/33
Yulianti, D. B., & Maghfiroh, A. (2022). The influence of application of Community Of Inquiry (COI) in Blend-Ed Learning. International Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(1), 57-65. https://doi.org/10.32528/issh.v2i1.158
Zarrinabadi, N. (2014). Communicating in a second language: Investigating the effect of teacher on learners’ willingness to communicate. System, 42(1), 288-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.12.014
Zhang, R. (2020). Exploring blended learning experiences through the community of inquiry framework. Language Learning & Technology, 24(1), 38-53. https://doi.org/10125/44707
Zhao, H., & Sullivan, K.P. (2017). Teaching presence in computer conferencing learning environments: Effects on interaction, cognition and learning uptake. British journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 538-551. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12383
Downloads
Received: 29-05-2024Accepted: 14-08-2024Published: 18-10-2024Statistics Views
Abstract: 1171 PDF: 43How to Cite
Olaguer, V. R. F., Marcos, S. M. M., Solayao, R. A., Pelaez, E. R. B., & Lagat, K. T. (2024). Blended learning in higher education: Correlating teaching presence, student engagement, and satisfaction. HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - SOCIAL SCIENCES, 16(2), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.16.2.3456.2026License
Copyright (c) 2024 Venson Ray Felicia Olaguer; Shada Marie Mecaydor Marcos; Roanne Aguipo Solayao; Eden Rose Brignas Pelaez; Kevin Taer Lagat

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
For authors
Other
Indexing By
- Shada Marie Mecaydor Marcos
