--

4 (1) 2014

The effectiveness of group work activity to enhance students‘ writing skills in ACET language center


Author - Affiliation:
Tong Thi Thu Dung - Ho Chi Minh City Open University , Vietnam
Corresponding author: Tong Thi Thu Dung - kim.npt@ou.edu.vn

Abstract
Over the years, peer response including group work activities confirms its
important role in learning a foreign language, especially in writing skills which was most paid attention in teaching and learning in Vietnam. This research aimed at the effectiveness of collaborative work to students in English writing classes. Thirty six preintermediate students in two different writing classes of ACET language center have participated in this survey. At the end of three-month course, they provided their own opinions for the group work activities whether it contributed to their writing. Their ideas revealed from the questionnaires confirm the effectiveness of group work activities in developing students’ writing skill as well as their suggestion to apply this activity to all other English classes.

Keywords
Group work; peer response; group contribution; group discussion; cooperativework

Full Text:
PDF

References

Bafile, C 2008, The “Jigsaw” Approach Brings Lessons to Life, Retrieved May 15, 2013, from Education World: http://www.educationworld.com/a_curr/curr324.shtml.


Bell, J. H 1991, ‘Using peer response groups in ESL writing classes’, TESL Couldada Journal, Vol.8, 65 - 71. cited in Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W 2008, ‘To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the review’s own writing’, Journal of Second language Writing, pp. 1-14.


Bruffee, K 1978, ‘The Brooklyn Plan: Attaining intellectual growth through peer-group tutoring, Liberal Education, 64, 447 - 468. cited in Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W 2008, ‘To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the review’s own writing’, Journal of Second language Writing, pp. 1-14.


Chaudron, C 1993, Second language classrooms, Research on teaching and learning.


Chen, H. Y 2010, ‘Structuring Cooperative Learning in Teaching English Pronunciation’, English Language Teaching, Vol. 4(No. 3).


Hedeen, T 2003, ‘The reverse jigsaw: A process of cooperative learning and discussion’, Teaching Sociology, 325-332.


Huong, L. P. H 2006, ‘Learning Vocabulary in Group Work in Vietnam’, RELC Journal: A Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 37(1), 105-121.


Huong, L. P. H 2007, ‘The more knowledgeable peer, target language use, and group participation’, Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 64(2), 329-350.


Holliday, D. C 2002, Jigsaw IV: Using student/teacher concerns to improve jigsaw III, ERIC ED 465687.


Hyland, F 2000, ‘ESL writers and feedback: Giving more autonomy to students’, Language Testing Research, Vol.4, 33 - 54. cited in Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W 2008, ‘To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the review’s own writing’, Journal of Second language Writing, pp. 1-14.


Joe, A 2008, SAW - V - Welcome Back Jigsaw! Retrieved May 15, 2013, from Associated Content: http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/430263/.


Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T 1995, ‘Teaching Students to Be Peacemakers (3rd ed.)’, Edina.


Kibler, A 2011, ‘I write it in a way that people could read it: How teachers and adolescent L2 writers describe content area writing’, Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol.20, 211–226.


Lockhart, C. & 1995, ‘Analyzing talk in ESL peer response groups: Stances, functions, and content’, Language Learning, Vol.45, 605 - 655. cited in Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W 2008, ‘To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the review’s own writing’, Journal of Second language Writing, pp. 1-14.


Long, M. H 1983, ‘Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers’ Studies in second language acquisition, 5(2), 177-193.


Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W 2008, ‘To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the review’s own writing’, Journal of Second language Writing, pp. 1-14.


Paulus, T. M 1999, ‘The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing’, Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol.8, 265 - 289. cited in Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W 2008, ‘To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the review’s own writing’, Journal of Second language Writing, pp. 1-14.


Pham-Ho, Vu Phi 2013, ‘Các Hoạt Động Dạy và Học Môn Viết tại Khoa Ngoại ngữ Đại học Mở TP.HCM’, Tạp Chí Khoa học trường Đại học Mở TP.HCM, 3 (31), 96-115.


QiaoMengduo 2010, ‘Jigsaw Strategy as a Cooperative Learning Technique: Focusing on the Language LearnersChinese’, Journal of Applied Linguistics (Bimonthly), Vol.33.


Sharwood-Smith, M 1981, ‘Consciousness-raissing and the second language learner’, Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 159-168.


Vygotskiĭ, L. L. S 1978, Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, Harvard university press.


Weijen, D. v., Bergh, H. v., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Sanders, T 2009, ‘L1 use during L2 writing: An empirical study of a complex phenomenon’, Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol.18, 235–250.


Wright, D., & Baily, M 2004, Focus on language classroom.


Xiao-ming, D 2007, Promotion of interaction in cooperative learning task, Vol.4, (ISSN1539-8072).




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.