ChatGPT in education: Its value, accuracy, and regulation
Authors
-
Angelo Frank Pacala
pacala_frank05@yahoo.com
Presidential School of Uzbekistan, Qarshi City, Uzbekistanhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5774-0008
DOI:
10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.15.2.3159.2025Keywords:
artificial intelligence; ChatGPT; data protection; education; Government regulation; traditional narrative synthesis reviewAbstract
ChatGPT is an AI-based assistant that has revolutionized the education sector. It is a natural language processing technology that uses machine learning algorithms to generate human-like responses to various queries and conversations in real time. The program was launched in 2022 and has proven its value in education. However, the grey area in generative transformer tools such as ChatGPT is enormous, including utilization value, data accuracy, and protection, and government regulations. The primary purpose of this research is to synthesize various published studies since the inception of ChatGPT. This research utilized a traditional narrative synthesis review to capture the value and regulation of ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence concerning education. The results showed that teachers and students benefited from the program, such as personalized learning experiences, teacher-student interactions, increased engagement, and teachers’ lesson and assessment planning. However, the level of accuracy of information ChatGPT provides still needs to be 100% accurate since various studies have mixed results on the accuracy of the information given by ChatGPT. The user should be able to delineate which data is incorrect. Furthermore, countries worldwide have passed laws and regulations to ensure that AI tools such as ChatGPT would not harm users. Overall, Chat-GPT has the potential to revolutionize the way we approach education. As this technology becomes more global, it will be essential to continue testing and refining ChatGPT to improve the user experience and maintain ethical considerations.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.References
Abdullah, M., Madain, A., & Jararweh, Y. (2022, November). ChatGPT: Fundamentals, applications, and social impacts. In 2022 Ninth International Conference on Social Networks Analysis, Management and Security (SNAMS) (pp. 1-8). IEEE.
Act Now Training. (2023). Exploring the legal and regulatory challenges of AI and chat GPT. https://actnowtraining.blog/2023/05/02/exploring-legal-and-regulatory-challenges-of-ai-and-ChatGPT/
Aithal, S., & Aithal, P. S. (2023). Effects of AI-based ChatGPT on higher education libraries. International Journal of Management, Technology and Social Sciences (IJMTS), 8(2), 95-108.
Ausat, A. M. A., Massang, B., Efendi, M., Nofirman, N., & Riady, Y. (2023). Can chat GPT replace the role of the teacher in the classroom: A fundamental analysis. Journal on Education, 5(4), 16100-16106.
Baidoo-anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L. (2023). Education in the era of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1337500
Biswas, S. (2023). Role of ChatGPT in education. Journal of ENT Surgery Research, 1(1), 1-2.
Blake, A. (2023, August). ChatGPT is violating your privacy, says major GDPR complaint. Digital Trends. https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/openai-chatgpt-privacy-complaint-gdpr/
Božić, V. & Poola, I. (2023). Chat GPT and education [Unpublished article]. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.18837.40168
Cain, W. (2023). GPTeammate: A design fiction on the use of variants of the GPT language model as cognitive partners for active learning in higher education. In Society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 1293-1298). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Cotton, D. R., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
De Angelis, L., Baglivo, F., Arzilli, G., Privitera, G. P., Ferragina, P., Tozzi, A. E., & Rizzo, C. (2023). ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: The new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, Article 1567.
Downes, S. (2022). Connectivism. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 58-87.
Firat, M. (2023). What ChatGPT means for universities: Perceptions of scholars and students. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 57-63. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.22
Fudge, N., Sadler, E., Fisher, H. R., Maher, J., Wolfe, C. D., & McKevitt, C. (2016). Optimising translational research opportunities: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of basic and clinician Scientists’ perspectives of factors which enable or hinder translational research. PLoS One, 11(8), Article e0160475.
George, A. S., & George, A. H. (2023). A review of ChatGPT AI’s impact on several business sectors. Partners Universal International Innovation Journal, 1(1), 9-23.
Hacker, P., Engel, A., & Mauer, M. (2023). Regulating ChatGPT and other large generative AI models. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 1112-1123). Association for Computing Machinery.
Hassani, H., & Silva, E. S. (2023). The role of ChatGPT in data science: How ai-assisted conversational interfaces are revolutionizing the field. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 7(2), 62-71.
Jannach, D., & Chen, L. (2022). Conversational recommendation: A grand AI challenge.
AI Magazine, 43(2), 151-163.Johnson, D., Goodman, R., Patrinely, J., Stone, C., Zimmerman, E., Donald, R., & Wheless, L. (2023). Assessing the accuracy and reliability of AI-generated medical responses: An evaluation of the ChatGPT model. Research Square, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2566942/v1
Kharpal, A. (2023). China releases rules for generative AI like ChatGPT after Alibaba, Baidu launch services. Consumer News and Business Channel. https://www.cnbc.com/2023/04/11/china-releases-rules-for-generative-ai-like-chatgpt-after-alibaba-launch.html
Lee, H. (2023). The rise of ChatGPT: Exploring its potential in medical education. Anatomical Sciences Education, 1(1) 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2270
Lubowitz, J. H. (2023). ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence chatbot, is impacting medical literature. Arthroscopy, 39(5), 1121-1122.
Marron, L. (2023). Exploring the potential of ChatGPT 3.5 in higher education: Benefits, limitations, and academic integrity. In Handbook of research on redesigning teaching, learning, and assessment in the digital era (pp. 326-349). IGI Global.
Massey, C., & Strong, J. (2023). Innovative approaches for preparing special education preservice teachers. Journal of Special Education Preparation, 3(1), 46-55.
Mhlanga, D. (2023). Open AI in education, the responsible and ethical use of ChatGPT towards lifelong learning. In FinTech and artificial intelligence for sustainable development: The role of smart technologies in achieving development goals (pp. 387-409). Springer Nature Switzerland.
Patel, S. B., & Lam, K. (2023). ChatGPT: The future of discharge summaries? The Lancet Digital Health, 5(3), e107-e108.
Piaget, J. (1964). Part I: Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning. Journal Research in Science Teaching, 2(3), 176-186. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660020306
PIMLOC. (2023). ChatGPT data breach: A wake-up call for privacy and security in large language models. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/chatgpt-data-breach-wake-up-call-privacy-security-large
Qadir, J. (2023). Engineering education in the era of ChatGPT: Promise and pitfalls of generative AI for education. In 2023 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 1-9). IEEE.
Ray, P. P. (2023). ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 3(1), 121-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003
Reyna, J. (2023). The potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and ChatGPT for teaching, learning and research. In EdMedia + Innovate learning (pp. 1509-1519). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Rivas, P., & Zhao, L. (2023). Marketing with ChatGPT: Navigating the ethical terrain of
GPT-based chatbot technology. Artificial Intelligence, 4(2), 375-384.Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1),
342-363. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9Shahriar, S., & Hayawi, K. (2023). Let’s have a chat! A conversation with ChatGPT: Technology, applications, and limitations. Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 2(1), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewAIA3202939
Shepardson, D. & Bartz, D. (2023). US begins study of possible rules to regulate AI like ChatGPT. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/technology/us-begins-study-possible-rules-regulate-ai-like-chatgpt-2023-04-11/
Temsah, O., Khan, S. A., Chaiah, Y., Senjab, A., Alhasan, K., Jamal, A., & Senjab, A. M. (2023). Overview of early ChatGPT’s presence in medical literature: Insights from a hybrid literature review by ChatGPT and human experts. Cureus, 15(4), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37281
Wagner, M. W., & Ertl-Wagner, B. B. (2023). Accuracy of information and references using ChatGPT-3 for retrieval of clinical radiological information. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal, 75(1), 69-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/08465371231171125.
Weaver, S. J., Dy, S. M., & Rosen, M. A. (2014). Team-training in healthcare: A narrative synthesis of the literature. BMJ Quality & Safety, 23(5), 359-372.
Yu, H. (2023). Reflection on whether Chat GPT should be banned by academia from the perspective of education and teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(1), Article 2156.
Yue, T., Au, D., Au, C. C., & Lu, K. Y. (2023). Democratizing financial knowledge with ChatGPT by OpenAI: Unleashing the power of technology [Unpublished article]. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4346152
Downloads
Received: 02-01-2024Accepted: 02-02-2024Published: 10-07-2024Statistics Views
Abstract: 664 PDF: 316How to Cite
Pacala, A. F. (2024). ChatGPT in education: Its value, accuracy, and regulation. HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - SOCIAL SCIENCES, 15(2), 116–127. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.15.2.3159.2025License
Copyright (c) 2024 Angelo Frank Pacala

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
