Common errors in writing journals of the English major students at Ho Chi Minh City Open University

Authors

  • Pham Vu Phi Ho
    Ho Chi Minh City Open University, Viet Nam
  • Pham Ngoc Thuy Duong
    The National College of Education Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam

Keywords:

writing journals; errors; mistakes; writing practice; and writing fluency

Abstract

Students’ writing problems are always a primary concern of instructors in writing classrooms, and to know the common errors which frequently occur on students’ writing papers is usually what the writing instructors have conducted in the classrooms. However, no research study has been conducted at the Faculty of Foreign languages at HCMC Open University to investigate into this aspect. The purpose of the current study is to investigate the common written errors on students’ writing journals and to see whether the extensive writing helps enhance students’ writing fluency. 115 first year English-major students participated in this study. They composed five writing journals every week during the course of 15 weeks. Each student composed 62 writing journals in total. The study found that four most common errors frequently occur in students’ writing journals are relating to tenses, collocations, spellings, and verb forms. Also, the current study confirms that the extensive writing practices effect the students’ writing fluency in terms of length of writing. The results of the study help the writing instructors at the local setting with the facts of their students’ writing problems in order to improve the writing practices in the writing classrooms. Particularly, the finding of this study confirms the effects of extensive writing so that the instructors and students could take this issue into their practices beyond the classrooms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bacha, N. N. (2002). Developing Learners’ Academic Writing Skills in Higher Education: A Study for Educational Reform. Language and Education, 16(3), 161-177.

Belhaj, A. M. (1997). Contrastive Textual Analysis: An Arabic-English English-Arabic Translation Corpus. Occasional Papers, 24(25), 103-150.

Bhela, B. (1999). Native language interference in learning a second language: Exploratory case studies of native language interference with target language usage. International Education Journal, 1(1), 22-31.

Darus, S., & Ching, K. H. (2009). Common Errors in Written English ssays of Form One Chinese Students: A case Study. European Journal of Social Sciences, 10(2), 242-253.

El-Sayed, A. M. (1982). An Investigation into the Syntactic Errors of Saudi Freshmen’s English Compositions. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation: Indiana University of Pennsylvania, U.S.A.

Downloads

Received: 02-06-2020
Accepted: 02-06-2020
Published: 31-05-2015

Statistics Views

Abstract: 2204
PDF: 1139

How to Cite

Ho, P. V. P., & Duong, P. N. T. (2015). Common errors in writing journals of the English major students at Ho Chi Minh City Open University. HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - SOCIAL SCIENCES, 5(1), 13–22. Retrieved from https://journalofscience.ou.edu.vn/index.php/soci-en/article/view/315