--

14(3)2024

The dignity of work and the challenge of artificial intelligence


Author - Affiliation:
Melchor Labao Cuizon - Central Luzon State University
Jose Epimaco Reyes. Arcega - Central Luzon State University
Randolf Warren Ggregorio Talavera. Mayo II - Central Luzon State University
Jay Balmes Villafria - Central Luzon State University
Corresponding author: Melchor Labao Cuizon - cuizonmel@clsu.edu.ph
Submitted: 08-11-2023
Accepted: 04-01-2024
Published: 27-03-2024

Abstract
The Social Teachings of the Church define work as a “human act” (opus humanum), an “arduous good” (bonum arduum), and an expression of the intrinsic value and dignity of the human person. The right to work is not only granted by the State but rather a disposition of the value possessed by a person in fulfilling his/her “destiny and vocation” as a rational and autonomous being. However, the breakthroughs of modernity dichotomized the established value of humanity and his work. Artificial Intelligence (AI) is on the way to altering this essential relationship, giving priority to Machine Intelligence (MI). This admiration of humanity for the proliferation of technical advances lurks a certain danger, “a danger as such” if I may use Heidegger’s term. The danger is not only the possible displacements of humanity in his/her work but rather an alienated individual stripped of his/her worth and dignity as a person who is the sole object of work. This paper argues that (1) the human person remains the indispensable subject of work and (2) artificial intelligence is problematic. To facilitate the said discourse, the work of John Paul II “Laborem Exercems” (John Paul II, 1981), shall be the guide in exploring the issue.

Keywords
artificial intelligence; challenge; dignity at work

Full Text:
PDF

Cite this paper as:

Cuizon, M. L., Arcega, J. E. F. R., Mayo II, R. W. G. T., & Villafria, J. B. (2024). The dignity of work and the challenge of artificial intelligence. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science – Social Sciences, 14(3), 3-11. doi:10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.14.3.3060.2024


References

Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence, automation, and work in the economics of artificial intelligence: An agenda edited by Ajay Agrawal, Joshua Gans, and Avi Goldfarb. Chicago, IL and London, UK: University of Chicago Press.


Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.


Bruun, E., & Duka, A. (2018). Artificial intelligence, jobs and the future of work: Racing with the machines. Basic Income Studies, 13(2), 1-15. doi:10.1515/bis-2018-0018


Brynjolfsson, E., & Mitchell, T. (2017). What can machine learning do? Workforce implications. Science, 358(6370), 1530-1534. doi:10.1126/science.aap8062


Dreyfus, H., & Dreyfus, S. (1984). Mindless machines. Computers don’t think like experts, and never will. The Sciences, 24(6), 18-21. doi:10.1002/j.2326-1951.1984.tb02749.x


Francis. (2015). Laudato Si. On care for our common home. Retrieved October 10, 2023, from https://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_ 20150524_enciclica-laudato-si.html


Gaburro, G., & Cressotti, G. (1998). Work as such - the social teaching of the church on human work. International Journal of Social Economics, 25(11/12), 1618-1639. doi:10.1108/03068299810233259


John Paul II. (1981). Laborem exercems. Retrieved October 10, 2023, from https://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_%2014091981_laborem-exercens.html


Kenaw, S. (2008). Hubert L. Dreyfus’s critique of classical AI and its rationalist assumptions. Minds & Machines,18, 27-238. doi:10.1007/s11023-008-9093-7


Kim, P. T., & Bodie, M. T. (2021). Artificial intelligence and the challenges of workplace discrimination and privacy. ABA Journal of Labor and Employment Law, 21(26).


Maboloc, R. (2021). Herbert Marcuse’s theory of domination. SABTON: Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 1, 1-14


Maboloc, R., & Pastrana, K. (2022). The question of ethics in modern technology. The URSP Research Journal, 8(1), 1-7.


Paul VI. (1967). Populorum progression. Retrieved October 10, 2023, from https://www.vatican.va/content/paul-vi/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-vi_enc_26031967_ populorum.html


Paul VI. (1971). Octogesima advenuens. Retrieved October 10, 2023, from https://www.vatican.va/content/paulvi/en/apost_letters/documents/hf_p-vi_apl_19710514_ octogesima-adveniens.html


Pew Research Center. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the future of humans. Retrieved October 10, 2023, from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/12/10/artificial-intelligence-and-the-future-of-humans/


Preston, J. (2022). Artificial intelligence in the capitalist university academic labor, commodification, and value. New York, NY and London, UK: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.


Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition. (1952). BibleGateway. Retrieved October 10, 2023, from https://www.biblegateway.com/versions/Revised-Standard-Version-Catholic-Edition-RSVCE-Bible/#vinfo


Sayers, S. (2005). Why work? Marx and human nature. Science & Society, 69(4), 606-616.


Schotte, G. E. (1982). The social teaching of the church: Laborem exercises, a new challenge. Review of Social Economy, 40(3), 340-359. doi:10.1080/00346768200000036


Sison, A. J., Ferrero, I., & Guitián, G. (2016). Human dignity and the dignity of work: Insights from catholic social teaching. Business Ethics Quarterly, 26(4), 503-528. doi:10.1017/beq.2016.18


Walsh, T., Levy, N., Bell, G., Elliott, A., Maclaurin, J., Mareels, I., & Wood, F. (2019). The effective and ethical development of artificial intelligence: An opportunity to improve our wellbeing. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council of Learned Academia (ACOLA). 


Wang, P. (2019). On defining artificial intelligence. Journal of artificial genera Intelligence. Sciendo, 10(2), 1-37. doi:10.2478/jagi-2019-0002



DOI: https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.14.3.3060.2024
Creative Commons License
© The Author(s) 2024. This is an open access publication under CC BY NC licence.