--

1 (1) 2011

The effectiveness of the blog-based peer response for L2 writing


Author - Affiliation:
Pham Vu Phi Ho - Faculty of Foreign Languages, HCMC Open University , Vietnam
Siriluck Usaha - Sripatum University - Chonburi, Thailand
Corresponding author: Pham Vu Phi Ho - phamvuphiho@gmail.com

Abstract
Few studies have been conducted to see how Blog-based peer response helps students improve their writing revisions. The present study aims to investigate (1) types of comments most frequently generated via blog, (2) the differences between global and local comments, (3) and students’ writing quality via blog-based peer response activities. Thirty-two 2nd year English major students taking a 15-week academic writing course at a Vietnamese university were selected to participate in this study. The students posted their writing on the blogs and provided and received comments for revisions. Data collection was from students’ comments on each other’s writing via blogs and their Drafts 1 – 3. Results indicated that “suggestion/ advice”, “clarification”, “confirmation”, and “evaluation” were the four most frequently used types of comments during the peer response sessions. In addition, the students provided more comments on the global than on local areas to help one another improve their writing quality. Finally, the students composed better and longer essays from the first to the third drafts; yet, there was great correlation between students’ language proficiency and their writing outcomes. The study brings lights for instructors who expect to apply the blog to their writing classrooms.

Keywords
Blog-based; peer response; global and local comments; writing quality

Full Text:
PDF

References

Berg, E. C. (1999). The Effects of Trained Peer Response ESL Students’ Revision Types and Writing Quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8 (3), 215 – 241.


Braine, G. (1997). Beyond word processing: Networked computers in ESL writing classes. Computers and Composition, 14 (1), 45-58.


Braine, G. (2001). A study of English as a foreign language (EFL) writers on a local-area network (LAN) and in traditional classes. Computers and Composition, 18 (3), 275-292.


Fleta, B. M. & Sabater, C. P. (2010). A research on blogging as a platform to enhance language skills. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2 (2), 773 – 777.


Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (Eds.)(2006) Feedback in second Language writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.


Jones, H. R., Garralda, A., Li, C. S. D. and Lock, G. (2006). Interactional dynamics in online and face-to-face peer-tutoring sessions for second language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15 (1), 1-23.


Kim Lien (2006). Oct. 12th, 2006. Bay nam hoc o pho thong: Tai sao khong biet noi tieng Anh?. Retrieved Nov. 17th, 2006, from http://www.tuoitre.com.vn/Tianyon/Index.aspx?articleID=166558&ChannelID=13.


Lightfoot, M. J. (2006) A comparative analysis of e-mail and face-to-face communication in an educational environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 9 (3), 217-227.


Liu, J. & Hansen, G. J. (2005). Peer Response in Second Language Writing Classroom. U.S.A: The University of Michigan Press.


Luu, Q. Thanh (2006, August, 12th). De ra Kieu Ay Thi Con Nhieu Tai Tieng. Retrieved on June 3, 2007 from http://www.tuoitre.com.vn/Tianyon/Index.aspx ArticleID=155515&ChannelID=87.


Liu, J. & Sadler, R. W. (2003). The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2 (3), 193-227.


Matsumura, S. & Hann, G. (2004). Computer anxiety and students’ preferred feedback methods in EFL Writing. The Modern Language Journal, 88 (3), 403-415.


Min, H. T. (2005) Training students to become successful peer reviewers. System, 33 (2), 293-308.


Nguyen, T. K. Thu (2002). Error Feedback in L2 Writing Classes: How explicit does it need to be? Unpublished M.A. Dissertation, University of Social Sciences & Humanities, HCMC.


Nguyen, T. T. Ha (2004). The use of group work in foreign language classes: Factors leading to success. Unpublished M.A. Dissertation, University of Social Sciences & Humanities, HCM City, Vietnam.


Nguyen, V. Cai, (2006). Jul. 26th, 2006. Nhung Bai Van … De So. Retrieved Nov. 24th, 2006, from http://www.tuoitre.com.vn/Tianyon/Index.aspx?ArticleID=152367&ChannelID=13.


Nunan, D. (Ed.), (1993). Collaborative Language Learning and Teaching. Great Britain: Bell & Bain Ltd.


Pham, V. P. Ho & Usaha, Siriluck. (2009). Blog-based peer response for EFL writing: A Case study in Vietnam. AsiaCALL Online Journal, (ISSN 1936-9859) 4 (1), 1-29.


Richards, C. J. & Lockhart, C. (2000). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. UK: Cambridge University Press.


Rodriguez, R. R. (2003). Computer-Mediated Peer Response and Its Impact on Revision in The College Spanish Classroom: A Case Study. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, College of Arts & Sciences and College of Education University of South Florida.


Stanley, J. (1992). Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1 (3), 217-233.


Song, Wang. & Usaha, Siriluck (2009). How EFL University Students Use Electronic Peer Response into Revision. Suranaree Journal of Science and Technology, 16 (3), 263-275.


Sullivan, N. & Pratt, E. (1996). A comparative study of two ESL writing environments: A computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom. System, 24 (4), 491-501.


Tran, Ngoc Bao (2000). A combination of skills & strategies and genre analysis approaches in designing a course to improve magazine writing. Unpublished M.A. Dissertation, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, HCM City, Vietnam.


Tran, P. L. Phan (2006, August 26th). Đổi mới cách đào tạo giáo viên văn. Retrieved on June 3, 2007 from http://www.tuoitre.com.vn/Tianyon/Index.aspx ArticleID=158342&ChannelID=13.


Tsui, A. B. M. and Ng, M. (2000). Do Secondary L2 Writers Benefit from Peer Comments? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9 (2), 147-170.


Tuzi, K. (2004) The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course. Computers and Composition, 21 (2), 217-235.


Viet, A. (2006, July 26th). Cac Bai Van Dang Duoc ‘Cong Thuc Hoa’. Retrieved on June 3, 2007 from http://vnexpress.net/Vietnam/Xa-hoi/2006/07/3B9EC5BC/


Warschauer, M. (1996). Computer Assisted Language Learning: an Introduction. Retrieved on June 4, 2007 from http://www.ict4lt.org/en/warschauer.htm.


Warschauer, M. (2002). Networking into Academic Discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1 (1), 45–58.


Yang, Y-F (2010). Students’ reflection on online self-correction and peer review to improve writing. Computers & Education, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu. 2010.05.017.


Zhu, W. (2001). Interaction and feedback in mixed peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10 (4), 251–276.



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.