--

7 (1) 2017

The use of linguistic units and their implicatures in the listening section of TOEFL iBT test


Author - Affiliation:
Le Thi Nhu Lien - Dak Lak Teacher Training College , Vietnam
Tran Quoc Thao - Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology , Vietnam
Corresponding author: Le Thi Nhu Lien - lethinhulien@gmail.com

Abstract
Implicature is a means of conveying what speakers mean linguistically, and it is most commonly used in spoken language. Identifying the possible interpretations and discovering the implied meanings of the information, nevertheless, are really challenging for non-native English speakers, especially for ESL/EFL test-takers who are under testing pressure. This descriptive study, therefore, aimed to quantitatively and qualitatively explore the language units and their implicatures used in the listening section of TOEFL iBT (Test of English as a Foreign Language versioned Internet-based test). A corpus consisting of 87 lectures, 97 long conversations, and 31 short conversations/adjacency pairs that were sourced from TOEFL iBT materials was developed. The framework employed to analyze data was based on the initial lists of triggers proposed by Gazdar (1979), Grice (1978), Levinson (1993), and Yule (1996). The findings reveal that linking words are the most common linguistic units while set phrases are the least common ones that are used to trigger implicatures in the listening section of TOEFL iBT materials. Additionally, diverse implicatures of linguistic units used in the listening section of TOEFL iBT are uncovered.

Keywords
Implicature;Language unit; Listening; TOEFL iBT

Full Text:
PDF

References

Edmun, P. & MacKinnon (2006). Developing Skills for the TOEFL® iBT (Intermediate). Los Angeles, CA: Compass Publishing.


Educational Testing Service, (2007). The Official Guide to the TOEFL iBT .International Edition.


Educational Testing Service (ETS) (2015). Test and Score Data Summary for TOEFL iBT Tests. International Edition.


Gazdar, G. (1979). Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logic Form. New York: Academic.


Green, G. M. (1996). Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.


Grice, P. (1978). Further Notes on Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics: Vol.9, Pragmatics: 113-27. New York: Academic Press.


Horn, L. R. (2004). Implicature. In L. R. Horn & W. Gregory (Eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics, (pp. 3-28). Oxford: Blackwell.


Jessop, H. L. (2009). TOEFL iBT Listening Breakthrough. Ho Chi Minh: Van Hoa Sai Gon Publishing house.


Kate K. (2000). Implicature and Semantic Change. Retrieved from


http://www.google.com.vn/search?hl=vi&source=hp&biw=1003&bih=592&q=Implicature + and + Semantic


+Change&oq=Implicature


Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Link, W. Kushwaha, M. N., & Kato, M. (2007). How to Master Skills for the TOEFL iBT (Intermediate Listening). Ho Chi Minh: Nhan Tri Viet publishing house.


MacGillivray, M., Yancey, P. & Malarcher C. (2006). Mastering Skills for the TOEFL® iBT: Advanced, 2006. Los Angeles, CA: Compass Publishing


Mitchell S. G. (1998). Direct Reference and Implicature. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 91(1), 61-90.


Nguyen, G. T. (2000). Vietnamese Pragmatics (Dụng Học Việt Ngữ). Ha Noi: Publishing House of National University.


Nguyen, N. H. T. (2007). An Investigation into Means to Signal Presuppositions and Implicatures in English Discourse. M.A. Thesis, Danang University.


To, T. M. (2007). English Semantics. Ho Chi Minh City: The Publishing House of National University.


Wierzbicka, A. (1992). The Semantics of Interjection. Journal of Pragmatics, 18, 159-192.


Worchester, A., Lark B., & Eric W. (2006). Building Skills for the TOEFL® iBT: Beginning. Los Angeles, CA: Compass Publishing.


Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.