Comparative study on the evaluation of student teacher’s performance

Charina Bardoquillo; Angen May Charcos

doi:10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.14.4.2914.2024

14(4)2024

Comparative study on the evaluation of student teacher’s performance

Author - Affiliation:

Charina Bardoquillo - Cebu Technological University - Tuburan, Cebu City

Angen May Charcos - Cebu Technological University - Tuburan, Cebu City

Corresponding author: Angen May Charcos - angen08@gmail.com

DOI:10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.14.4.2914.2024

Submitted: 18-08-2023
Accepted: 28-11-2023
Published: 02-04-2024

Abstract

This study determined the comparison on the evaluation of student teacher’s performance of the BSED-MATH, BEED, and BTLED students in Cebu Technological University-Tuburan Campus for the school year 2017 - 2020. The key purpose of this research was to determine the performance of the student teachers based on the evaluation of the mentors in terms of (1) instructional design and planning; (2) learning environment; (3) instructional delivery and facilitation; (4) assessment; (5) professional responsibility and conduct. The research employed a descriptive survey approach, in which researchers collected data and information from the Student Teacher Coordinator to assess the performance of student teacher mentors. The tables show the scores based on the evaluation of the student teachers under the five factors in three consecutive school years. Based on the findings of the study, it was concluded that there was a discrepancy in the result of the evaluation of the student teachers’ performance in the year 2019 - 2020, which is higher compared to the two previous years. It was also determined that the student teachers scored low on the factor under Instructional Delivery and Facilitation. It is recommended to conduct a Student Teacher’s Capabilities Program for all fourth-year students at Cebu Technological University to address the needs of the student teachers in terms of delivering and facilitating instructions.

Keywords

comparative study; evaluation; student teacher; performance

Full Text:

PDF

Cite this paper as:

Bardoquillo, C., & Charcos, A. M. (2024). Comparative study on the evaluation of student teacher’s performance. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science – Social Sciences, 14(4), 51-68. doi:10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.14.4.2914.2024

References

Abdulloh, K. N., Lubis, S., & Lubis, L. (2023). The relationship between emotional intelligence and family support with student achievement in history at SMA Negeri 1 Pancur Batu. International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS), 3(5), 1674-1684.

Albasin-Lacaba, I. G., Avenir, M., Permejo, J., & Edu, E., Jr. (2022). Anxiety of practice teachers on final teaching demonstration. Journal of Education, Management and Development Studies, 2(1), 110-121.

Aljafar, M. R., Rahman, A. M., Ahmad, S. R., & Zahran, A. (2020). Factors affecting the effectiveness of teaching practices. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 9(3), 520-528.

Andrade, H. L. (2019, August). A critical review of research on student self-assessment. In Frontiers in education (Vol. 4, p. 87). Lausanne, Switzerland: Frontiers Media SA.

Behizadeh, N., & Lynch, T. L. (2017). Righting technologies: How large-scale assessment can foster a more equitable education. Berkeley Review of Education, 7(1).

Brown, G. T. (2019, June). Is assessment for learning really assessment? In Frontiers in education (Vol. 4, p. 64). Lausanne, Switzerland: Frontiers Media SA.

Cherry, K. (2020). The David Kolb theory of how experience influences learning. New York, NY: Verywell Mind.

Cheung, S. K. S., Kwok, L. F., Phusavat, K., & Yang, H. H. (2021). Shaping the future learning environment with smart elements: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), Article 16. doi:10.1186/s41239-021-00254-1

Ching, G. (2018). A literature review on the student evaluation of teaching: An examination of the search, experience, and credence qualities of SET. Higher Education Evaluation and Development, 12(2), 63-84.

Christie A. (2005). Constructivism and its implications for educators. Retrieved May 10, 2023, from https://projectkings.com.ng/2021/05/26/constructivists-learning-strategies-and-students -academic-performance-in-physics/

Cibula, D., Pötter, R., Planchamp, F., Avall-Lundqvist, E., Fischerova, D., Haie-Meder, C., ... Raspollini, M. R. (2018). The European society of gynaecological oncology/European society for radiotherapy and oncology/European society of pathology guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer. Virchows Archiv, 472, 919-936.

Creneti, J. (2012). Types of teaching aids. Retrieved May 10, 2023, from http./Avww.ehow.com.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among the five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Dayagbil, F. T., Palompon, D. R., Garcia, L. L., & Olvido, M. M. J. (2021, July). Teaching and learning continuity amid and beyond the pandemic. In Frontiers in education (Vol. 6,
p. 678692). Lausanne, Switzerland: Frontiers Media SA.

Dimkpa, D. I. (2015). Teachers’ conduct in the 21st century: The need for enhancing students’ academic performance. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(35) 71-78.

Fasano, R. D. (2023). Documentary-style educational video for online learners: Student perceptions of an innovative approach to learning (Doctoral dissertation, Northeastern University). Retrieved May 10, 2023, from https://repository.library.northeastern.edu/files/ neu:4f18p6793/fulltext.pdf

Filipsson, K., Petersson, T., Höjesjö, J., Piccolo, J. J., Näslund, J., Wengström, N., & Österling, E. M. (2018). Heavy loads of parasitic freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera L.) larvae impair foraging, activity and dominance performance in juvenile brown trout (Salmo trutta L.). Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 27(1), 70-77.

Fishback, W. W. (1948). A rationale for the evaluation of student teaching. The Elementary School Journal, 48(9), 498-504.

Gan, Z. (2014). Learning from interpersonal interactions during the practicum: A case study of non-native ESLstudent teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 40(2), 128-139.

Gonzales, R. (2017). Student teachers’ performance as evaluated by cooperating officials. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 4(4), 21-29.

Gray, A. (1997). Constructivist teaching and learning (SSTA Research Centre Report No. 97-07). Retrieved May 10, 2023, from https://saskschoolboards.ca/wp-content/uploads/97-07.htm

Gröschner, A., Müller, K., Bauer, J., Seidel, T., Prenzel, M., Kauper, T., & Möller, J. (2015). Praxisphasen in der Lehrerausbildung - Eine Strukturanalyse am Beispiel des gymnasialen Lehramtsstudiums in Deutschland [Field experiences in teacher training: a structural analysis of secondary teacher education in Germany]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 18(4), 639-665.

Hamilton-Jones, B. M., & Vail, C. O. (2014). Preparing special educators for collaboration in the classroom: Pre-service teachers’ beliefs and perspectives. International Journal of Special Education, 29(1), 76-86.

Hamre, B. K., Pianta, R. C., Burchinal, M., Field, S., LoCasale-Crouch, J., Downer, J. T., ... Scott-Little, C. (2012). A course on effective teacher-child interactions: Effects on teacher beliefs, knowledge, and observed practice. American Educational Research Journal, 49(1), 88-123.

Hascher, T., & Kaiser, C. (2015). The acquisition of negative knowledge during field experience in teacher education. Fehler: Ihre Funktionen im Kontext individueller und gesellschaftlicher Entwicklung, 227-244.

Haycock, K. (1998). Good teaching matters: How well-qualified teachers can close the gap. Thinking k-16, 3(2), Article n2.

Isman, A. (2011). Instructional design in education: New model. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 10(1), 136-142.

Mclntyre, D. J., & Guyton, E. (1990). Student teaching and school experiences. In Handbook of research on teacher education. London, UK: Macmillan.

McLean, L., & Sandilos, L. (2022). Teachers well-being: Sources, implications, and directions for research. Routledge Resources Online, 1(1), 1-8. doi:10.4324/9781138609877-REE153-1

McMillan, J. H. (2000). Fundamental assessment principles for teachers and school administrators. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 7(1), Article 8.

Murphy, E., Dingwall, R., Greatbatch, D., Parker, S., & Watson, P. (1998). Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: A review of the literature. Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 2(16), iii-274.

Ní Shé, C., Farrell, O., Brunton, J., & Costello, E. (2021). Integrating design thinking into instructional design: The #OpenTeach case study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(1), 33-52.

Okoye, K., Arrona-Palacios, A., Camacho-Zuñiga, C., Hammout, N., Nakamura, E. L., Escamilla, J., & Hosseini, S. (2020). Impact of students evaluation of teaching: A text analysis of the teachers qualities by gender. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1-27.

Oyarzun, B., Barreto, D., & Conklin, S. (2018). Instructor social presence effects on learner social presence, achievement, and satisfaction. TechTrends, 62, 625-634.

Pianta, R. C., La Paro, K. M., & Hamre, B. K. (2008). Classroom assessment scoring system™: Manual K-3. Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes Publishing.

Poom-Valickis, K., & Löfström, E. (2019). “Pupils should have respect for you, although I have no idea how to achieve this?”: The ideals and experiences shaping a teacher’s professional identity. Educational Studies, 45(2), 145-162.

Prameswari, S. J., & Budiyanto, C. (2017). The development of the effective learning environment by creating an effective teaching in the classroom. IJIE (Indonesian Journal of Informatics Education), 1(1), 79-86.

Prawat, R. S. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning: A constructivist perspective. American Journal of Education, 100(3), 354-395.

Quintero, L. J. C., & Williamson, B. (2021). Assembling new toolboxes of methods and theories for innovative critical research on educational technology. NAER: Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 10(1), 1-14.

Reardon, M. (2013). A review related literature of student teaching evaluation. Richmond, VA: Virginia Commonwealth University.

Rice, F., Frederickson, N., Shelton, K., McManus, C., Riglin, L., & Ng-Knight, T. (2015). Identifying factors that predict successful and difficult transitions to secondary school. London, UK: University College London.

Rivera, P. M., Gómez, F. P., & de Caldas, J. (2017). Understanding student-teachers’ performances within an inquiry-based practicum. English Language Teaching, 10(4),
127-139.

Rusticus, S. A., Pashootan, T., & Mah, A. (2023). What are the key elements of a positive learning environment? Perspectives from students and faculty. Learning Environments Research, 26(1), 161-175.

Shaughnessy, M., DeFino, R., Pfaff, E., & Blunk, M. (2021). I think I made a mistake: How do prospective teachers elicit the thinking of a student who has made a mistake? Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 24, 335-359.

Stewart, J., Lambert, M. D., Ulmer, J. D., Witt, P. A., & Carraway, C. L. (2017). Discovering quality in teacher education: Perceptions concerning what makes an effective cooperating teacher. Journal of Agricultural Education, 58(1), 280-299.

Subedi, D. (2009). Assessing English language teaching student teachers on teaching practice. Journal of NELTA, 138-145.

Tyagi, A., Jaiswal, D., & Sharma, J. (2023). Role of training comprehensiveness and resource commitment in enhancing the police performance leading to development of public trust. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 1-12.

Western Governors University. (2022). Experiential learning theory. Millcreek, UT: Western Governors University.

Wrenn, J., & Wrenn, B. (2009). Enhancing learning by integrating theory and practice. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21(2), 258-265.

Yaakob, M. F. M., Don, Y., Pauzi, N., Fauzi, N. F., & Habibi, A. (2023). Increasing teacher leadership skills in coping with student discipline problems through discipline management approaches. Mojem: Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Management, 11(1), 55-67.

Yan, C., & He, C. (2010). Transforming the existing model of teaching practicum: A study of Chinese EFL student teachers’ perceptions. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 36(1), 57-73.

Yancey, K. B. (Ed.). (2023). ePortfolio as curriculum: Models and practices for developing students’ ePortfolio literacy. Milton Park, UK: Taylor & Francis.

Young, R., & Collin, A. (2004). Introduction: Constructivism and social constructionism in the career field. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 64(3), 373-388.

Zain, I. M., Muniandy, B., & Hashim, W. (2016). An integral ASIE ID model: The 21st century instructional design model for teachers. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(3), 547-554.

Zheng, L., & Smaldino, S. (2003). Key instructional design elements for distance education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(2), 153-166.

Zurcher, D. M., Phadke, S., Coppola, B. P., & McNeil, A. J. (2016). Using student-generated instructional materials in an e-homework platform. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(11), 1871-1878.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.14.4.2914.2024