Enhancing face-to-face evaluation using alternative optical mark recognition: A case study from the University of Cabuyao’s college of education

Authors

DOI:

10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.14.1.2905.2024

Keywords:

alternative optical mark recognition; Evalbee; integrating automation; student test evaluation; technology in education

Abstract

Technology is defined as the use of scientific knowledge to solve practical problems. However, educators’ initiatives to integrate technology have been mostly prohibitively expensive. In this context, researchers proposed the automation of one of the most important processes but highly repetitive tasks among educators, the processing of student test results. The aim was to determine the alignment with evaluation standards and the acceptability of a cost-effective alternative. This study utilized a mixed-method approach, specifically concurrent triangulation. Quantitative and qualitative data were gathered concurrently, and then compared and combined the results to get a comprehensive understanding of the topic. Quantitatively, it involved the use of mean, standard deviation, t-test, and Cohen’s d to evaluate Alternative Optical Mark Recognition (AOMR) according to the required educators’ evaluation standards and its impact on reducing educators’ clerical workload. Qualitatively, semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis were employed to elucidate educators’ perspectives regarding the use of AOMR and the broader integration of technology as a whole. Results showed a one-hundred-thirty times efficiency compared to the manual process without losing the accuracy and reliability of data. Participants underscored the positive effect of AOMR in diminishing the labor-intensive nature of a crucial yet arduous clerical task for educators. Additionally, participants also emphasized unexpected benefits, including email results distribution, backup e-copies of sheets, ease of data management, class record integration, and automated student ranking. These findings offer valuable insights into the challenges surrounding the integration of technology in educational contexts in general, shedding light on the advantages of AOMR in the evaluation of student test results, in particular.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, J., & Lee, R. (2018). The future of well-being in a tech-saturated world. Retrieved May 10, 2023, from Pew Research Center website: https://assets.pewresearch.org/wp%20content/uploads/sites/14/2018/04/14154552/PI_2018.04.17_Future-of-Well-Being_FINAL.pdf

Cabigas, L. M. (2019). Who let the teachers out: Exploring the main factors contributing to teacher attrition in Philippine schools. Retrieved May 10, 2023, from https://www.academia.edu/39721541/Who_Let_the_Teachers_Out_Exploring_the_Main_Factors_which_Contribute_to_Teacher_Attrition_in_Philippine_Schools

Calaguas, N. P., & Consunji, P. P. (2022). Mobile optical mark recognition application as a non-inferior alternative to manual marking for lower- and middle-income countries. PSU Journal of Advanced Studies, 5, 10-19.

Catalan, J. A. (2017). A framework for automated multiple-choice exam scoring with digital image and assorted processing using readily available software. Manila, Philippines: De La Salle University.

Commission on Higher Education. (2022). CHED memorandum order no. 16, series of 2022. “Update on onsite learning in higher education”. Retrieved May 10, 2023, from https://ched.gov.ph/2022-ched-memorandum-orders/

Downloads

Received: 14-08-2023
Accepted: 23-10-2023
Published: 29-02-2024

Statistics Views

Abstract: 699
PDF: 407

How to Cite

Cuerdo, R. P., & Sinfuego, L. X. L. (2024). Enhancing face-to-face evaluation using alternative optical mark recognition: A case study from the University of Cabuyao’s college of education. HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - SOCIAL SCIENCES, 14(1), 118–132. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.14.1.2905.2024