--

14 (1) 2024

Cognatic portrait of the indigenous languages of Tabuk City, Kalinga, Philippines


Author - Affiliation:
Abigail Quimosing-Ocay - Kalinga State University, Tabuk City, Kalinga
Corresponding author: Abigail Quimosing-Ocay - gail.888quimosing@gmail.com
Submitted: 07-06-2023
Accepted: 14-07-2023
Published: 29-02-2024

Abstract
Tabuk City in Kalinga, Philippines is a melting pot of diverse ethnolinguistic groups. Kalinga alone is known for its unique 46 ethnic groups, which include nine (9) in the locale of Tabuk City - Biga, Culminga, Dallak, Ga’dang, Guilayon, Malbong, Minanga, Nanong, and Tobog. Observations tell that these indigenous languages profess similarities that members of these groups do understand each other though they make use of their own indigenous language.
Hence, the study aimed to portray the linguistic cognates among the indigenous languages in Tabuk City, Kalinga. Specifically, the study found that there are cognates among the indigenous languages in Tabuk City as to lexical, morphological, and syntactic features. As to lexical features, there are cognates in the categories of counting numbers, pronouns, body parts, living things, and non-living things. On morphological features, there are cognates as to word formation processes, while as to syntactic features, cognates are found in the resemblances in sentence structures among the identified indigenous languages. Significantly, the study provides reference material for Mother-tongue teachers in teaching indigenous languages.
Finally, the study illustrates in a cognate map that Malbong, Nanong, Minanga, and Tobog indigenous languages denote higher resemblances as compared to the cognates among Biga, Culminga, Dallak, Guilayon, and Ga’dang.

Keywords
cognate maps; indigenous languages; linguistic cognates; linguistic features; linguistic resemblances

Full Text:
PDF

Cite this paper as:

Quimosing-Ocay, A. (2024). Cognatic portrait of the indigenous languages of Tabuk City, Kalinga, Philippines. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science – Social Sciences, 14(1), 85-103. doi:10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.14.1.2802.2024


References

Ayeomoni, M. (2012). The languages in nigerian socio-political domains: Features and functions. English Language Teaching, 5(10), 12-19.


Baggay, H., Melad, T., & Empedrad, L. (2016). Lexicography of kalinga dialects. Bannag: A Journal of Local Knowledge, 3(1), 25-34.


Beekes, R. (2011). Comparative Indo-European linguistics: An introduction (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Company.


Bernardo, E., Aggabao, N., & Tarun, J. (2018). The Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education (MTB-MLE) program in Northern Isabela, Philippines: Teachers’ competencies and pedagogical practices in teaching mother tongue. Retrieved October 10, 2022, from https://papers.iafor.org/wp-content/uploads/papers/aceid2018/ACEID2018_39796.pdf


Blust, R. (2023). Austronesian languages. Retrieved October 10, 2022, from Encyclopedia Britannica website: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Austronesian-languages


Blust, R. (Ed). (2019). Austronesian languages. Retrieved October 10, 2022, from Enclyclopedia Britannica website: https://www.britannica.com


Campbell, L. (1997). Genetic classification, typology, areal linguistics, language endangerment, and languages of the North Pacific Rim. In O. Miyaoka & M. Oshim (Eds.), Languuages of the North Pacific Rim (Vol. 2, pp. 172-242). Japan: Kyoto University.


Dixon, M. W. (2001). The Australian linguistic area. In A. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: Problems in comparative linguistics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.


Ethnologue. (n.d.). Kalinga. Retrieved October 10, 2022, from https://www.ethnologue.com/ search/?q=kalinga+languages


Ferreirinho, N. (1993). Selected topics in the grammar of Limos Kalinga, Philippines. Retrieved October 10, 2022, from https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/145804/ 1/PL-B109.pdf


Foley, R., & Lahr, M. (2011). The evolution of the diversity of cultures. Semantic Scholar, 366(1567), 1080-1089. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0370


Gonzales, R. J. (2017). Dialect parception and language development in Pasil, Kalinga. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Language Documentation and Conservation (ICLDC). Retrieved October 10, 2022, from http://hdl.handle.net/10125/42010


Great Soviet Encyclopedia. (1979). Genealogical classification of languages (Vol. 23). New York, NY: Mcmillian.


Guy, J. (2007). Lexicostatistics as chess: Observations on Paul Black’s ‘Lexicostatistics with massive borrowing’. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 27(1), 73-75. doi:10.1080/0726860060117 2967


Hazen, K. (2001). Teaching about dialects. Chinese regional languages/dialects. In ERIC clearinghouse on languages and linguistics (pp. 1-9). Retrieved October 10, 2022, from https://scholar.google.com/scholar


Himes, R. S. (1997). Reconstructions in Kalinga-Itneg. Oceanic Linguistics36(1), 102-134. doi:10.2307/3623072. JSTOR 3623072


Hymes, D. H. (1960).  Lexicostatistics so far. current anthropology. The University of Chicago Press Journals, 1(1), 3-44. doi:10.1086/200074


International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs. (2022). The indigenous world 2022: Philippines. Retrieved October 10, 2022, from https://iwgia.org/en/philippines/4656-iw-2022-philippines.html


McKenzie, A. (n.d.). Difference between an influence and a genetic relationship. Retrieved October 10, 2022, from Quora website: https://www.quora.com


Omar, A., & Alotaibi, M. (2017). Geographic location and linguistic diversity: The use of intensifiers in Egyptian and Saudi Arabic. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(4), 220-229. doi:10.5539/IJEL.V7N4P220


Peiros, I. (1998). Comparative linguistics in Southeast Asia. Retrieved October 10, 2022, from https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/ bitstream/1885/146631/1/PL-C142.pdf


Petyt, K. M. (1980). The study of dialect: An introduction to dialectology (pp. 1-8). London, UK: Andre Deutsch.


Philippine National Statistics Office. (1990). 1990 census of housing and population. Philippines: Republic of the Philippines, National Statistics Office.


Philippine Statistics Authority. (2018). Philippine figures 2018ol. 1). Retrieved October 10, 2022, from https://psa.gov.ph/sites/default/files/PIF%202018.pdf


Reid, L. A. (1971). Philippine minor languages: Word lists and phonologies. Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication, 8(169), 171-239.


Rowe, B., & Levine, D. (2014). A concise introduction to linguistics. New York, NY: Routledge.


Starostin, G. (2013). Lexicostatistics as basis for language classification: Increasing the pros, reducing the cons. In H. Fangerau, H. Geisler, T. Halling & W. Martin (Eds.), Classification and evolution in biology, linguistics and the history of science (pp. 126-145). Stuttgart, Germany: Franz Steiner Verlag.


Study. (2021). The effects of region & geography on language. Retrieved October 10, 2022, from https://study.com/academy/lesson/the-effects-of-region-geography-on-language.html


Trask, R. L. (2000). The dictionary of history and comparative linguistics. Chicago, IL and London, UK: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers.


United Nations Development Programme Philippines. (2013). Fast facts: Indigenous peoples in the Philippines. Mandaluyong, Philippines: United Nations Development Programme.


Vakkilainen, J. (n.d.). Difference between an influence and a genetic relationship. Retrieved October 10, 2022, from Quora website: https://www.quora.com


Watkins, C. (2001). An Indo-European linguistic area: Ancient anatolian.  In A. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: Problems in comparative linguistics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.



Creative Commons License
© The Author(s) 2024. This is an open access publication under CC BY NC licence.