Appraisal of the technology and livelihood education-information and communication technology in the new normal

Authors

  • Noel Niño Valle
    Arcelo Memorial National High School, Liloan, Cebu, Philippines
  • Lislee Valle
    Cebu Technological University, Danao City, Cebu, Philippines

DOI:

10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.14.1.2769.2024

Keywords:

modular learning; new normal; online learning; technology and livelihood education- ICT

Abstract

Online learning and modular learning have been promoted more and more deeply as a response to the issues of learning continuity during school closure due to the global pandemic. This study aims to determine the status of utilizing online and modular learning in the new normal in teaching Technology and Livelihood Education-Information and Communication Technology (TLE-ICT). Participants were two sections of grade 8 students: 42 under the modular learning modality and 42 under the online learning. T-tests on independent samples were conducted to determine if there were significant differences in the participants’ academic performance between the modular or online learning modalities in TLE-ICT. Based on the findings, learners in modular learning have higher marks than those in online learning. However, various factors may contribute to the difference in the student’s performance in both modalities. It is recommended that parents and learners in modular learning be oriented to the importance of learning and gaining skills rather than grades.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abante, A. S., Cruz, R., Guevarra, D., Lanada, M. I. B., Macale, M. J. S., Roque, M. W. B., Salonga, F. R., Santos, L. C., & Cabrera, W. C. (2021). A comparative analysis on the challenges of online learning modality and modular learning modality: A basis for training program. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 4(4), 463-476.

Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., & Lai, S. (2009). Measuring self regulation in online and blended learning environments. Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 1-6.

Barton, K., McKellar, P., & Maharg, P. (2000). Situated learning and the management of learning: A case study. The Law Teacher, 34(2), 141-163.

Cavanagh, M., & Mitchelmore, M. (2011). Learning to teach secondary mathematics using an online learning system. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 23(4), 417-435. doi:10.1007/s13394-011-0024-1

Chen, J. A., Star, J. R., Dede, C., & Tutwiler, M. S. (2018). Technology-rich activities: One type does not motivate all. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 54, 153-170. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.06.011

Downloads

Received: 08-05-2023
Accepted: 15-08-2023
Published: 29-02-2024

Statistics Views

Abstract: 894
PDF: 612

How to Cite

Valle, N. N., & Valle, L. (2024). Appraisal of the technology and livelihood education-information and communication technology in the new normal. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences, 14(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.14.1.2769.2024

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.