Appraisal of the technology and livelihood education-information and communication technology in the new normal

Noel Niño Valle; Lislee Valle

doi:10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.14.1.2769.2024

14 (1) 2024

Appraisal of the technology and livelihood education-information and communication technology in the new normal

Author - Affiliation:

Noel Niño Valle - Arcelo Memorial National High School, Liloan, Cebu

Lislee Valle - Cebu Technological University, Danao City, Cebu

Corresponding author: Lislee Valle - lislee.valle@ctu.edu.ph

DOI:10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.14.1.2769.2024

Submitted: 08-05-2023
Accepted: 15-08-2023
Published: 29-02-2024

Abstract

Online learning and modular learning have been promoted more and more deeply as a response to the issues of learning continuity during school closure due to the global pandemic. This study aims to determine the status of utilizing online and modular learning in the new normal in teaching Technology and Livelihood Education-Information and Communication Technology (TLE-ICT). Participants were two sections of grade 8 students: 42 under the modular learning modality and 42 under the online learning. T-tests on independent samples were conducted to determine if there were significant differences in the participants’ academic performance between the modular or online learning modalities in TLE-ICT. Based on the findings, learners in modular learning have higher marks than those in online learning. However, various factors may contribute to the difference in the student’s performance in both modalities. It is recommended that parents and learners in modular learning be oriented to the importance of learning and gaining skills rather than grades.

Keywords

modular learning; new normal; online learning; technology and livelihood education- ICT

Full Text:

PDF

Cite this paper as:

Valle, N. N., & Valle, L. (2024). Appraisal of the technology and livelihood education-information and communication technology in the new normal. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science – Social Sciences, 14(1), 3-11. doi:10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.14.1.2769.2024

References

Abante, A. S., Cruz, R., Guevarra, D., Lanada, M. I. B., Macale, M. J. S., Roque, M. W. B., Salonga, F. R., Santos, L. C., & Cabrera, W. C. (2021). A comparative analysis on the challenges of online learning modality and modular learning modality: A basis for training program. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 4(4), 463-476.

Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., & Lai, S. (2009). Measuring self regulation in online and blended learning environments. Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 1-6.

Barton, K., McKellar, P., & Maharg, P. (2000). Situated learning and the management of learning: A case study. The Law Teacher, 34(2), 141-163.

Cavanagh, M., & Mitchelmore, M. (2011). Learning to teach secondary mathematics using an online learning system. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 23(4), 417-435. doi:10.1007/s13394-011-0024-1

Chen, J. A., Star, J. R., Dede, C., & Tutwiler, M. S. (2018). Technology-rich activities: One type does not motivate all. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 54, 153-170. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.06.011

DepEd Order. (2012). Department of education order No. 67 s. 2012 (2012). Retrieved April 30, 2023, from https://www.deped.gov.ph/

DepEd Order. (2020). Department of education order No. 14 s. 2020. Retrieved April 30, 2023, from https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/DO_s2020_014.pdf

Durmus, S., & Karakirik, E. (2006). Virtual manipulatives in mathematics education: A theoretical framework. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 5(1), 117-123.

Galvis, H. A. (2012). Understanding beliefs, teachers’ beliefs and their impact on the use of computer technology. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development, 14(2), 95-112.

Halat, E., & Peker, M. (2011). The impacts of mathematical representations developed through webquest and spreadsheet activities on the motivation of pre-service elementary school teachers. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 10(2), 259-267.

Hollweck, T., & Doucet, A. (2020). Pracademics in the pandemic: Pedagogies and professionalism. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 5(3/4), 295-305.

Kofoed, M., Gebhart, L., Gilmore, D., & Moschitto, R. (2021). Zooming to class? Experimental evidence on college students online learning during Covid-19 (IZA Discussion Paper Series No. 14356). Retrieved April 30, 2023, from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?%20abstract%20_id=3846700

Li, Q., & Ma, X. (2010). A meta-analysis of the effects of computer technology on school students’ mathematics learning. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 215-243. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9125-8

McCulloch, A. W., Hollebrands, K., Lee, H., Harrison, T., & Mutlu, A. (2018). Factors that influence secondary mathematics teachers’ integration of technology in mathematics lessons. Computers & Education, 123, 26-40.

Ouyang, J. R., & Stanley, N. (2014). Theories and research in educational technology and distance learning instruction through Blackboard. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(2), 161-172.

Pura, H. F., & Galicia, L. S. (2022). Understanding the teachers’ lived experience in teaching technology and livelihood education (TLE) using modular distance learning in now normal. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 5(6), 1482-1490.

Quinlan, C. (2019). Use of schema theory and multimedia technology to explore preservice students’ cognitive resources during an earth science activity. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 19(3), 413-438.

Reed, M. S., Evely, A. C., Cundill, G., Fazey, I., Glass, J., Laing, A., ... Stringer, L. C. (2010). What is social learning? Ecology and Society, 15(4).

Salomon, G., Perkins, D., & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher, 20(4), 2-9

Shirvani, H. (2014). Pre-service teachers’ attitudes toward using technology in schools. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 15(1), 33-53.

Spencer, D., & Temple, T. (2021). Examining students’ online course perceptions and comparing student performance outcomes in online and face-to-face classrooms. Online Learning, 25(2), 233-261.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.14.1.2769.2024