Online teaching styles and age, sex, and degree program: A correlational - descriptive study
Authors
-
Gemar Mori
morigemarbarola@gmail.com
Liberal Arts and Education, The College of Maasin, PHhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0017-4361
- Edelweiss Bactindon
Liberal Arts and Education, The College of Maasin, PH- Keziah Keren Dublado
Liberal Arts and Education, The College of Maasin, PH- Jenelyn Garcia
Liberal Arts and Education, The College of Maasin, PH- Jaime Gimo
Liberal Arts and Education, The College of Maasin, PHDOI:
10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.13.1.2590.2023Keywords:
age; degree program; distance education; online teaching styles; sexAbstract
Diverse online teaching styles have become essential tools for developing quality distance education in private tertiary schools. This study explores college students’ preferred online teaching styles conceptualized by Rodriguez and Fahara. It also investigates and assumes no significant relationship exists between online teaching styles and students’ age, sex, or degree program. Three-hundred-three students from The College of Maasin participated in the study via Zoom. Utilizing a Google Form, data from the validated questionnaire was collected. According to the findings, students favored the “designer-oriented” style. Their age and sex correlate with their online teaching styles. However, insufficient evidence cannot establish a correlation between degree programs and online teaching styles. The paper also addressed implications and recommendations regarding how school administrators can assist instructors in adapting their teaching strategies to students’ preferred online teaching style, as well as how instructors can incorporate age-appropriate and sex-sensitive activities in their instruction in online distance education. In conclusion, this study provides a case study for future reference.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.References
Arbaugh, J. B. (2000). Virtual classroom characteristics and student satisfaction with internet-based MBA courses. Journal of Management Education, 24(1), 32-54.
Bamber, J., & Tett, L. (2000). Transforming the learning experiences of non-traditional students: A perspective from higher education. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(1), 57-75.
Barnes, K., Marateo, R. C., & Ferris, S. P. (2007). Teaching and learning with the net generation. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 3(4), Article 8.
Bates, A. T. (2005). Technology, e-learning and distance education. London, UK: Routledge.
Chizmar, J. F., & Walbert, M. S. (1999). Web-based learning environments guided by principles of good teaching practice. The Journal of Economic Education, 30(3), 248-259.
Conrad, R. M., & Donaldson, J. A. (2011). Engaging the online learner: Activities and resources for creative instruction. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Corbin, A. (2017). Assessing differences in learning styles: Age, gender and academic performance at the tertiary level in the Caribbean. The Caribbean Teaching Scholar, 7(1), 67-91.
Dinov, I. D., Sanchez, J., & Christou, N. (2008). Pedagogical utilization and assessment of the statistic online computational resource in introductory probability and statistics courses. Computers & Education, 50(1), 284-300.
Drabowicz, T. (2014). Gender and digital usage inequality among adolescents: A comparative study of 39 countries. Computers & Education, 74, 98-111.
Duffy, T. M., Deuber, B., & Hawley, C. L. (1998). Critical thinking in a distributed environment: A pedagogical base for the design of conferencing systems. In C. J. Bonk & K. S. King (Eds.), Electronic collaborators: Learner-centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship, and discourse (pp. 51-78). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dunn, R. (2009). Differentiated instruction strategies. Retrieved October 10, 2022, from https://www.classtime.com/blog/differentiated-instruction-strategies/
Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. J. (1999). The complete guide to the learning styles inservice system. Cambridge, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Emanuel, R. C., & Potter, W. J. (1992). Do students’ style preferences differ by grade level, orientation toward college, and academic major? Research in Higher Education, 33(3), 395-414.
Evans, T. (1999). Flexible delivery and flexible learning: Developing flexible learners? In Flexible learning, human resource and organisational development (pp. 227-240). London, UK: Routledge.
Evans, T. (2000). Flexible delivery and flexible learning: Developing flexible learners? In V. Jakupec & J. Garrick (Eds.), Flexible learning, human resource and organisational development (pp. 211-224). London, UK: Routledge.
Fairchild, A. J., Horst, S. J., Finney, S. J., & Barron, K. E. (2005). Evaluating existing and new validity evidence for the academic motivation scale. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(3), 331-358.
Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2005). Understanding student differences. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 57-72.
Gilakjani, A. P. (2012). A match or mismatch between learning styles of the learners and teaching styles of the teachers. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 4(11), 51-60.
Gilbert, N., & Stoneman, P. (Eds.). (2015). Researching social life. London, UK: Sage.
Grant, L. K., & Courtoreille, M. (2007). Comparison of fixed-item and response-sensitive versions of an online tutorial. Psychological Record, 57(2), 265-72.
Hanson, R. (2022). College enrollment and student demographic statistic. Retrieved October 10, 2022, from https://educationdata.org/college-enrollment-statistics
Harnish, R. J., & Bridges, K. R. (2011). Effect of syllabus tone: Students’ perceptions of instructor and course. Social Psychology of Education, 14(3), 319-330.
Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2000). Kolb’s experiential learning theory and its application in geography in higher education. Journal of Geography, 99(5), 185-195.
Hlawaty, H. (2008). Lernen and learning styles: A comparative analysis of the learning styles of German adolescents by age, gender, and academic achievement level. European Education, 40(4), 23-45.
Hodges, C. B., Moore, S., Lockee, B. B., Trust, T., & Bond, M. A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Retrieved October 10, 2022, from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Hung, M., Chou, C., Chen, C., & Own, Z. (2010). Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions. Computer Education, 55(3), 1080-1090.
Katz, Y. J. (2002). Attitudes affecting college students’ preferences for distance learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(1), 2-9.
Kia, M. M., Aliapour, A., & Ghaderi, E. (2009). Note for editor: Study of learning styles and their roles in the academic achievement of the students of Payame Noor University (PNU). Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 10(2), 24-37.
Lin, B., & Hsieh, C. T. (2001). Web-based teaching and learner control: A research review. Computers & Education, 37(3/4), 377-386.
Lincoln, F., & Rademacher, B. (2006). Learning styles of ESL students in community colleges. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 30(5/6), 485-500.
Liu, L. (2011). Factors influencing students’ preference to online learning: Development of an initial propensity model. International Journal of Technology in Teaching & Learning, 7(2), 93-108.
Liu, Y., & Ginther, D. (2002). Cognitive styles and distance education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 2(3), 1-19.
McVay, M. (2000). How to be successful distance learning student: Learning on the internet (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Custom.
Mkonto, N. (2015). Students’ learning preferences. Journal of Studies in Education, 5(3), 212-235.
Mohan, M., & Hull, R. E. (1975). A model for inservice education of teachers. Educational Technology, 15(2), 41-44.
Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. G. (1996). Distance education: A system view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Noskova, T., Pavlova, T., & Yakovleva, O. (2021). A study of students’ preferences in the information resources of the digital learning environment. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 14(1), 53-65.
O’Donnell, V. L., & Tobbell, J. (2007). The transition of adult students to higher education: Legitimate peripheral participation in a community of practice? Adult Education Quarterly, 57(4), 312-328.
Park, C. C. (1997). Learning style preferences of Asian American (Chinese, Filipino, Korean, and Vietnamese) students in secondary schools. Equity and Excellence in Education, 30(2), 68-77.
Peacock, M. (2001). Match or mismatch? Learning styles and teaching styles in EFL. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 1-20.
Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 21-40.
Reeves, T. C. (1993). Pseudoscience in computer-based instruction: The case of lecturer control research. Journal of Computer-based Instruction, 20(2), 39-46.
Reid, J. M. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 21(1), 87-111.
Revell, S. M. H., & McCurry, M. K. (2010). Engaging millennial learners: Effectiveness of personal response system technology with nursing students in small and large classrooms. Journal of Nursing Education, 49(5), 272-275.
Robotham, D. (1999). The application of learning style theory in higher education teaching. Retrieved October 10, 2022, from http://www.chlt.ac.uk/el/philg/gdn/discuss/kolb2.htm
Rodríguez, A., & Fahara, M. (2010). Online teaching style: A study in distance learning education. International Journal of University Teaching and Faculty, 1(2), 1-14.
Ryan, M., & Deci, E. L. (2013). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Retrieved October 10, 2022, from http://www.idtl.org/Journal/Jam_05/article01.html
Siemens, G. (2017). Connectivism. Provo, UT: EdTech Books.
Simonds, T. A., & Brock, B. L. (2014). Relationship between age, experience, and student preference for types of learning activities in online courses. Journal of Educators Online, 11(1), Article 19.
Smith, P. J. (2000). Preparedness for flexible delivery among vocational learners. Distance Education, 21(1), 29-48.
Smith, P. J., Murphy, K. L., & Mahoney, S. E. (2003). Towards identifying factors underlying readiness for online learning: An exploratory study. Distance Education, 24(1), 57-67.
Stern, B. S. (2004). A comparison of online and face-to-face instruction in an undergraduate foundations of American education course. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 4(2), 196-213.
Sternberg, R. (1997). Thinking styles. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Sun, A., & Chen, X. (2016). Online education and its effective practice: A research review. Journal of Information Technology Education, 15, 157-190.
Swan, K., Shea, P., Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., & Maher, G. (2000). Course design factors influencing the success of online learning. In WebNet World Conference on the WWW and Internet (pp. 513-518). New York, NY: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), 1024-1054.
Vita, G. D. (2001). Learning styles, culture and inclusive instruction in the multicultural classroom: A business and management perspective. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 38(2), 165-174.
Warner, D., Christie, G., & Choy, S. (1998). Readiness of VET clients for flexible delivery including on-line learning. Brisbane, Australia: Australian National Training Authority.
Widmeyer, W. N., & Loy, J. W. (1988). When you’re hot, you’re hot! Warm-cold effects in first impressions of persons and teaching effectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(1), 118-121.
Williamson, M. F., & Watson, R. L. (2007). Learning styles research: Understanding how teaching should be impacted by the way learners learn part III: Understanding how learners’ personality styles impact learning. Christian Education Journal, 4(1), 62-77.
Zinn, L. M. (2004). Exploring your philosophical orientation. In M. W. Galbraith (Ed.), Adult learning methods: A guide for effective instruction (3rd ed.). Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing Corporation.
Downloads
Received: 22-11-2022Accepted: 28-02-2023Published: 20-06-2023Statistics Views
Abstract: 764 PDF: 435How to Cite
Mori, G., Bactindon, E., Dublado, K. K., Garcia, J., & Gimo, J. (2023). Online teaching styles and age, sex, and degree program: A correlational - descriptive study. HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - SOCIAL SCIENCES, 13(1), 144–159. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.13.1.2590.2023License
Copyright (c) 2023 Gemar Mori; Edelweiss Bactindon; Keziah Keren Dublado; Jenelyn Garcia; Jaime Gimo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Edelweiss Bactindon
