Online teaching styles and age, sex, and degree program: A correlational - descriptive study

Authors

  • Gemar Mori
    Liberal Arts and Education, The College of Maasin, PH
  • Edelweiss Bactindon
    Liberal Arts and Education, The College of Maasin, PH
  • Keziah Keren Dublado
    Liberal Arts and Education, The College of Maasin, PH
  • Jenelyn Garcia
    Liberal Arts and Education, The College of Maasin, PH
  • Jaime Gimo
    Liberal Arts and Education, The College of Maasin, PH

DOI:

10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.13.1.2590.2023

Keywords:

age; degree program; distance education; online teaching styles; sex

Abstract

Diverse online teaching styles have become essential tools for developing quality distance education in private tertiary schools. This study explores college students’ preferred online teaching styles conceptualized by Rodriguez and Fahara. It also investigates and assumes no significant relationship exists between online teaching styles and students’ age, sex, or degree program. Three-hundred-three students from The College of Maasin participated in the study via Zoom. Utilizing a Google Form, data from the validated questionnaire was collected. According to the findings, students favored the “designer-oriented” style. Their age and sex correlate with their online teaching styles. However, insufficient evidence cannot establish a correlation between degree programs and online teaching styles. The paper also addressed implications and recommendations regarding how school administrators can assist instructors in adapting their teaching strategies to students’ preferred online teaching style, as well as how instructors can incorporate age-appropriate and sex-sensitive activities in their instruction in online distance education. In conclusion, this study provides a case study for future reference.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arbaugh, J. B. (2000). Virtual classroom characteristics and student satisfaction with internet-based MBA courses. Journal of Management Education24(1), 32-54.

Bamber, J., & Tett, L. (2000). Transforming the learning experiences of non-traditional students: A perspective from higher education. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(1), 57-75.

Barnes, K., Marateo, R. C., & Ferris, S. P. (2007). Teaching and learning with the net generation. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 3(4), Article 8.

Bates, A. T. (2005). Technology, e-learning and distance education. London, UK: Routledge.

Chizmar, J. F., & Walbert, M. S. (1999). Web-based learning environments guided by principles of good teaching practice. The Journal of Economic Education30(3), 248-259.

Downloads

Received: 22-11-2022
Accepted: 28-02-2023
Published: 20-06-2023

Statistics Views

Abstract: 764
PDF: 435

How to Cite

Mori, G., Bactindon, E., Dublado, K. K., Garcia, J., & Gimo, J. (2023). Online teaching styles and age, sex, and degree program: A correlational - descriptive study. HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - SOCIAL SCIENCES, 13(1), 144–159. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.13.1.2590.2023