Applying online peer feedback via a peer review application in English academic writing

Authors

  • Nguyen Ngoc Ly
    Ho Chi Minh City Open University, Ho Chi Minh City, VN

DOI:

10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.13.1.2300.2023

Keywords:

attitude; Google Classroom Peer Review (GCPR); online peer feedback (OPFB); peer feedback (PFB)

Abstract

Writing in English is widely regarded as a challenging skill since most students have found many problems somewhat occupying teachers’ time to help them overcome. Peer feedback, where students analyze and suggest revisions to each other’s work (Sukumaran & Dass, 2014), is a worthwhile alternative to teacher-based feedback, and its benefits in academic writing have been thoroughly examined. With great convenience, Google Classroom Peer Review (GCPR) recently began to capture teachers’ attention as an innovative online peer feedback tool. This study conducted a quasi-experiment to determine the impact of online peer feedback (OPFB) via GCPR on 32 first-year students and their attitudes toward online peer feedback. Three writing exercises as well as a questionnaire were used to gather the information. The findings show that the experimental group significantly improved their vocabulary and grammar usage in writing compared to the 32 students in the control group. The experimental group expressed their positive opinions of OPFB, regarding free selection and assigned-pair feedback. Additionally, the difficulties and recommendations that the study’s participants gave have greatly enhanced the use of OPFB. The research is eager to offer valuable recommendations for enhancing learners’ academic writing proficiency in further studies because of its practical efficacy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Badi, I. A. (2015). Academic writing difficulties of ESL learners. In The 2015 WEI International Academic Conference Proceedings, 1(1), 65-78.

Al-Fadda, H. (2012). Difficulties in academic writing: From the perspective of King Saud University postgraduate students. English Language Teaching, 5(3), 123-130.

Ballantyne, R., Hughes, K., & Mylonas, A. (2002). Developing procedures for implementing peer assessment in large classes using an action research process. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), 427-441.

Bauer, C., Figl, K., Derntl, M., Beran, P. P., & Kabicher, S. (2009, July). The student view on online peer reviews. In Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education (pp. 26-30). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.

Choi, J. (2014). Online peer discourse in a writing classroom. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 26(2), 217-231.

Downloads

Additional Files

Received: 16-05-2022
Accepted: 28-02-2023
Published: 20-06-2023

Statistics Views

Abstract: 584
Untitled: 0
PDF: 517

How to Cite

Ly, N. N. (2023). Applying online peer feedback via a peer review application in English academic writing. HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - SOCIAL SCIENCES, 13(1), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.13.1.2300.2023