--

12 (2) 2022

The deployment of English lexical bundles in applied linguistics research articles by Vietnamese researchers


Author - Affiliation:
Tran Quoc Thao - HUTECH University, Ho Chi Minh City , Vietnam
Nguyen Minh Khoi - HUTECH University, Ho Chi Minh City
Corresponding author: Tran Quoc Thao - tq.thao@hutech.edu.vn
Submitted: 03-04-2022
Accepted: 18-07-2022
Published: 24-09-2022

Abstract
Lexical Bundles (LBs) have been considered an effective tool for not only academic writing but also spoken discourse. The use of these clusters has attracted a lot of researchers in different registers because of their characteristics and functions in constructing the texts. However, research into LBs seems to be quite rare in English Applied Linguistics (AL) Research Articles (RAs) written by non-native English researchers, especially Vietnamese researchers. This study, therefore, aims to scrutinise Vietnamese researchers’ use of LBs in English AL RAs. A corpus of 77 AL RAs selected from three Journals was built. This study adapted the theoretical frameworks by Biber, Johansson, Leech, Conrad, and Finegan (1999), Biber, Conrad, and Cortes (2004) and Biber (2006) for data analysis. The findings revealed that Vietnamese researchers tended to deploy noun-based LBs more than verb-based and preposition-based ones in their AL RAs. It was further found LBs showing research-oriented functions were prevalent in AL RAs over text-oriented and participant-oriented ones. This research has pedagogical implications in terms of LB use for Vietnamese English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers and learners in the teaching and learning of academic writing.

Keywords
applied linguistics; corpus; lexical bundle; research article; Vietnamese researcher

Full Text:
PDF

Cite this paper as:

Tran, T. Q., & Nguyen, K. M. (2022). The deployment of English lexical bundles in applied linguistics research articles by Vietnamese researchers. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science – Social Sciences, 12(2), 75-84. doi:10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.12.2.2227.2022


References

Anthony, L. (2022). AntConc (Version 4.0.5) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University.


Biber, D. (2006). University language: A corpus-base study of spoken and written registers. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.


Biber, D., & Barbieri, F. (2007). Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes, 26(3), 263-286.


Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2004). If you look at…: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371-405.


Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). The longman grammar of spoken and written English. London, UK: Pearson Education Ltd.


Byrd, P., & Coxhead, A. (2010). On the other hand: Lexical bundles in academic writing and in the teaching of EAP. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL5(5), 31-64.


Chen, Y. H., & Baker, P. (2010). Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing. Language Learning & Technology14(2), 30-49.


Cortes, V. (2004). Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing. Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes, 23(4), 397-423.


Gil, N. N., & Caro, E. M. (2019). Lexical bundles in learner and expert academic writing. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 12(1), 65-90.


Granger, S. (2014). A lexical bundle approach to comparing languages. Stems in English and French. Languages in Contrast, 14(1), 58-72. doi:10.1075/lic.14.1.04gra


Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourse: Social interactions in academic writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.


Hyland, K. (2005). Meta discourse: Exploring interactions in writing. London, UK: Continuum.


Hyland, K. (2008). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and discipline variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 4-21.


Nesi, H., & Basturkmen, H. (2006). Lexical bundles and discourse signalling in academic lectures. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 11(3), 283-304.


Parvizi, N. (2011). Identification of discipline-specific lexical bundles in education (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Kashan, Iran.


Qin, J. (2014). Use of formulaic bundles by non-native English graduate writers and published authors in applied linguistics. Systems, 42(1), 220-231.


Salazar, D. (2014). Lexical bundles in native and non-native scientific writing. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.


Simpson, R. (2004). Stylistic features of academic speech: The role of formulaic expressions. In T. Upton & U. Connor (Eds.), Discourse in the professions: Perspectives from corpus linguistics (pp. 36-74). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.


Tran, T. Q., & Duong, M. T. (2013). Hedging: A comparative study of research article results and discussion section in Applied Linguistics and Chemical Engineering. English for Specific Purposes World, 14(41), 1-13.


Tran, T. Q., & Tang, T. B. (2022). Hedging in the results and discussion section of English applied linguistics research articles by Vietnamese and foreign writers. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(1), 119-124. doi:10.17507/jltr.1301.14


Valipoor, L. (2010). A corpus-based study of words and bundles in chemistry research articles. (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Kashan, Iran.


Wei, Y., & Lei, L. (2011). Lexical bundles in academic writing of advanced Chinese EFL learners. RELC Journal, 42(2), 155-166.


Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.