Pivotal roles of teachers and students in enhancing an active learning environment

Authors

  • Le Hoang Dung
    University of Social Sciences and Humanities - Vietnam National University - HCMC, Vietnam
  • Le Tan Cuong
    University of Social Sciences and Humanities - Vietnam National University - HCMC, Vietnam

DOI:

10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.11.2.1985.2021

Keywords:

active learning; English; programs; Vietnam

Abstract

The success of a language class does not simply depend on the students’ achievement of learning outcomes. However, this is mostly expected by educators who advocate applying outcome-based education. Indeed, it is how the teacher and the students within a class can create an environment where active learning is of greater importance. This paper discusses the results of a case study at a selected faculty. The data were collected from semi-structured interviews with 12 full-time teachers and staff and surveyed responses from 233 students taking an English undergraduate honors program at a selected public university in Ho Chi Minh City. This case study aims to analyze difficulties students and teachers encounter in building an active learning environment for a program. It also aims to identify the roles of teachers and students in doing so. As found in the study, major difficulties in building an active learning environment include the fixed curriculum, large class size, students’ low autonomy, limited learning resources, and the wide gap between teachers’ teaching activities and students’ expectations. In order to successfully create an active learning environment at Vietnamese universities, it is suggested that teachers should be more reasonably flexible, open-minded, and helpful throughout the teaching process, while students are expected to be more critical, self-directed, and disciplined in learning. Several major pedagogical implications for both teachers and students are also well elaborated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barkley, E. F. (2010). Student engagement techniques - A handbook for college faculty. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Bloom, B. S. (1953). Thought processes in lectures and discussions. Journal of General Education, 7(3), 160-169.

Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports No. 1). Retrieved May 10, 2021, from https://www.ashe.ws/higheredreport

Carr, R., Palmer, S., & Hagel, P. (2015). Active learning: The importance of developing a comprehensive measure. Active Learning in Higher Education, 16(3), 173-186. doi:10.1177/1469787415589529

Chi, M. T. H. (2009). Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science 1(1), 73-105. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x

Downloads

Received: 06-07-2021
Accepted: 11-09-2021
Published: 21-12-2021

Statistics

Abstract: 577
PDF: 548

FWCI: ---

How to Cite

Dung, L. H., & Cuong, L. T. (2021). Pivotal roles of teachers and students in enhancing an active learning environment. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences, 11(2), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.11.2.1985.2021

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.