Service quality in higher education: Applying HEdPERF scale in Vietnamese universities

Authors

  • Le Dinh Minh Tri
    International University, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
  • Tran Thi Hoang Lam
    International University, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
  • Nguyen Quang Trang
    International University, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam

DOI:

10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.11.1.1905.2021

Keywords:

HEdPERF; higher education; service quality; student satisfaction; Vietnam

Abstract

As the higher education sector is more competitive and globalized, service quality and student satisfaction are increasingly essential and attract more attention. However, research on this topic usually employed general service models applied for the higher education context. This paper investigates the service quality in higher education by combining the HEdPERF model and the popular two-dimensional service quality model to link the general and context-focused perspective. Data were obtained from 335 respondents who are students in Vietnamese universities. Findings indicate the effects of functional and technical service quality on student satisfaction and determine each HEdPERF dimension’s relationships on the two dimensions of service quality. This study contributes to understanding the path from service performance in the higher education sector, service quality dimensions, and satisfaction. This also provides suggestions for Vietnamese universities in improving their performance and services.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, F. (2005). HEdPERF versus SERVPERF: The quest for ideal measuring instrument of service quality in higher education sector. Quality Assurance in Education, 13(4), 305-328. doi:10.1108/09684880510626584

Abdullah, F. (2006a). Measuring service quality in higher education: HEdPERF versus SERVPERF. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 24(1), 31-47. doi:10.1108/02634500610641543

Abdullah, F. (2006b). Measuring service quality in higher education: Three instruments compared. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 29(1), 71-89. doi:10.1080/01406720500537445

Abdullah, F. (2006c). The development of HEdPERF: A new measuring instrument of service quality for the higher education sector. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(6), 569-581. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2005.00480.x

Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2019). Persons pursuing multiple objects of interest in multiple contexts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 34(1), 1-24.

Downloads

Received: 01-06-2021
Accepted: 19-06-2021
Published: 29-06-2021

Statistics Views

Abstract: 1409
PDF: 1802

How to Cite

Tri, L. D. M., Lam, T. T. H., & Trang, N. Q. (2021). Service quality in higher education: Applying HEdPERF scale in Vietnamese universities. HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - SOCIAL SCIENCES, 11(1), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.11.1.1905.2021