Bắt nạt trực tuyến và hành vi của người ngoài cuộc

Abbott, N., & Cameron, L. (2014). What makes a young assertive bystander? The effect of intergroup contact, empathy, cultural openness, and in‐group bias on assertive bystander intervention intentions. Journal of Social Issues, 70(1), 167-182.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), Article 191.

Batanova, M., Espelage, D. L., & Rao, M. A. (2014). Early adolescents’ willingness to intervene: What roles do attributions, affect, coping, and self-reported victimization play? Journal of School Psychology, 52(3), 279-293.

Brody, N., & Vangelisti, A. L. (2016). Bystander intervention in cyberbullying. Communication Monographs, 83(1), 94-119.

Carlo, G., Hausmann, A., Christiansen, S., & Randall, B. A. (2003). Sociocognitive and behavioral correlates of a measure of prosocial tendencies for adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 23(1), 107-134.

DeSmet, A., Bastiaensens, S., Van Cleemput, K., Poels, K., Vandebosch, H., Cardon, G., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2016). Deciding whether to look after them, to like it, or leave it: A multidimensional analysis of predictors of positive and negative bystander behavior in cyberbullying among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 398-415.

Gahagan, K., Vaterlaus, J. M., & Frost, L. R. (2016). College student cyberbullying on social networking sites: Conceptualization, prevalence, and perceived bystander responsibility. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1097-1105.

Hayashi, Y., & Tahmasbi, N. (2022). Psychological predictors of bystanders’ intention to help cyberbullying victims among college students: An application of theory of planned behavior. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(13/14), NP11333-NP11357.

Hite, D. M., Voelker, T., & Robertson, A. (2014). Measuring perceived anonymity: The development of a context independent instrument. Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences, 5(1), 22-39.

Kemp, S. (2021). Digital 2021 global overview report. Truy cập ngày 15/10/2021 tại https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2021-global-overview-report

Koehler, C., & Weber, M. (2018). “Do I really need to help?!” Perceived severity of cyberbullying, victim blaming, and bystanders’ willingness to help the victim. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 12(4), Article 4.

Lantané, B., & Darley, J. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Macaulay, P. J., Boulton, M. J., & Betts, L. R. (2019). Comparing early adolescents’ positive bystander responses to cyberbullying and traditional bullying: The impact of severity and gender. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 4(3), 253-261.

Machackova, H., Dedkova, L., & Mezulanikova, K. (2015). Brief report: The bystander effect in cyberbullying incidents. Journal of Adolescence, 43, 96-99.

Madden, C., & Loh, J. (2020). Workplace cyberbullying and bystander helping behaviour. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(19), 2434-2458.

Microsoft Vietnam Communications. (2020). Nghiên cứu của Microsoft cho thấy cứ 10 người dùng internet tại Việt Nam thì có hơn 5 người liên quan đến các hành vi bắt nạt [Microsoft research shows that more than 5 out of 10 internet users in Vietnam are involved in bullying behaviors]. Truy cập ngày 20/05/2022 tại https://goeco.link/VuZdN

Montero-Carretero, C., & Cervelló, E. (2020). Teaching styles in physical education: A new approach to predicting resilience and bullying. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(1), Article 76.

Musharraf, S., & Anis-ul-Haque, M. (2018). Impact of cyber aggression and cyber victimization on mental health and well-being of Pakistani young adults: The moderating role of gender. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 27(9), 942-958.

NapoleonCat. (2022). Social media users in Viet Nam. Truy cập ngày 15/10/2021 tại https://napoleoncat.com/stats/social-media-users-in-viet_nam/2022/09/

Obermaier, M., Fawzi, N., & Koch, T. (2016). Bystanding or standing by? How the number of bystanders affects the intention to intervene in cyberbullying. New Media & Society, 18(8), 1491-1507.

Oh, I., & Hazler, R. J. (2009). Contributions of personal and situational factors to bystanders’ reactions to school bullying. School Psychology International, 30(3), 291-310.

Ortega, R., Elipe, P., Mora‐Merchán, J. A., Genta, M. L., Brighi, A., Guarini, A., … Tippett, N. (2012). The emotional impact of bullying and cyberbullying on victims: A European cross‐national study. Aggressive Behavior, 38(5), 342-356.

Reniers, R. L., Corcoran, R., Drake, R., Shryane, N. M., & Völlm, B. A. (2011). The QCAE: A questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(1), 84-95.

Runions, K. C. (2013). Toward a conceptual model of motive and self-control in cyber-aggression: Rage, revenge, reward, and recreation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(5), 751-771.

Salmivalli, C., & Pöyhönen, V. (2012). Cyberbullying in finland. Cyberbullying in the Global Playground: Research from International Perspectives, 57-72.

Sarmiento, A., Herrera-López, M., & Zych, I. (2019). Is cyberbullying a group process? Online and offline bystanders of cyberbullying act as defenders, reinforcers and outsiders. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 328-334.

Spreng, R. N., McKinnon, M. C., Mar, R. A., & Levine, B. (2009). The toronto empathy questionnaire: Scale development and initial validation of a factor-analytic solution to multiple empathy measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(1), 62-71.

Thornberg, R., & Jungert, T. (2013). Bystander behavior in bullying situations: Basic moral sensitivity, moral disengagement and defender self-efficacy. Journal of Adolescence, 36(3), 475-483.

Walther, J. B. (2015). Social information processing theory (CMC). The International Encyclopedia of Interpersonal Communication, 1-13.

Yot-Domínguez, C., Franco, M. D. G., & Hueros, A. D. (2019). Trainee teachers’ perceptions on cyberbullying in educational contexts. Social Sciences, 8(1), Article 21.

You, L., & Lee, Y.-H. (2019). The bystander effect in cyberbullying on social network sites: Anonymity, group size, and intervention intentions. Telematics and Informatics, 45, Article 101284.

Xem thêm