Ảnh hưởng của tham nhũng đến hiệu quả hoạt động của các doanh nghiệp Việt Nam: Vai trò điều tiết của chuyển đổi số
Các tác giả
-
Trần Thị Thảo Quyên
Đại học Kinh tế Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh - Phân hiệu Vĩnh Long, Vĩnh Long, Việt Namhttps://orcid.org/0009-0007-8277-4673
- Nguyễn Văn Tiến Sơn sonnvt@ueh.edu.vn
Đại học Kinh tế Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh - Phân hiệu Vĩnh Long, Vĩnh Long, Việt Namhttps://orcid.org/0009-0001-2615-7714- Đoàn Thị Thanh Hòa
Đại học Kinh tế Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh - Phân hiệu Vĩnh Long, Vĩnh Long, Việt Namhttps://orcid.org/0009-0001-7967-5515- Trần Ngọc Hòa
Đại học Kinh tế Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh - Phân hiệu Vĩnh Long, Vĩnh Long, Việt Namhttps://orcid.org/0009-0001-8309-5652DOI:
10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.vi.21.3.4615.2026Từ khóa:
chuyển đổi số; hiệu quả hoạt động của doanh nghiệp; tham nhũng; Việt NamPhân loại JEL:
D73; D22; O33; O53; H83Tóm tắt
Sử dụng dữ liệu bảng từ 60 tỉnh thành Việt Nam giai đoạn 2010 - 2022, nghiên cứu này sử dụng phương pháp hồi quy HDFE, 2SLS và hồi quy phân vị để đánh giá tác động của tham nhũng đến hiệu quả hoạt động của doanh nghiệp trong bối cảnh số hoá. Kết quả ủng hộ giả thuyết “bánh xe cát”, tham nhũng làm suy yếu hiệu quả hoạt động của doanh nghiệp ở địa phương. Đáng chú ý, chuyển đổi số làm giảm tác động tiêu cực của tham nhũng đến hiệu quả hoạt động của doanh nghiệp. Bên cạnh đó, nghiên cứu cũng chỉ ra rằng hiệu quả chi phí thời gian là một cơ chế quan trọng trong mối quan hệ giữa tham nhũng và hiệu quả doanh nghiệp. Kết quả này nhấn mạnh các hàm ý chính sách trong việc thúc đẩy tăng trưởng doanh nghiệp thông qua việc thúc đẩy vai trò của chuyển đổi số địa phương.
Tải xuống
Dữ liệu tải xuống chưa có sẵn.Tài liệu tham khảo
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2013). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Currency.
Adam, I., & Fazekas, M. (2021). Are emerging technologies helping win the fight against corruption? A review of the state of evidence. Information Economics and Policy, 57, Article 100950. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INFOECOPOL.2021.100950
Amin, M., & Motta, V. (2023). The impact of corruption on SMEs’ access to finance: Evidence using firm-level survey data from developing countries. Journal of Financial Stability, 68, Article 101175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2023.101175
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), Article 277. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), Article 1173.
Berends, H., Smits, A., Reymen, I., & Podoynitsyna, K. (2016). Learning while (re)configuring: Business model innovation processes in established firms. Strategic Organization, 14(3), 181-219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127016632758
Bessen, J. E., & Righi, C. (2019). Shocking technology: What happens when firms make large IT investments? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3371016
Blackburn, K. (2012). Corruption and development: Explaining the evidence. The Manchester School, 80(4), 401-428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.2012.02314.x
Boikos, S., Pinar, M., & Stengos, T. (2023). Bribery, on-the-job training, and firm performance. Small Business Economics, 60(1), 37-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-022-00633-6
Casadesus-Masanell, R., & Zhu, F. (2013). Business model innovation and competitive imitation: The case of sponsor-based business models. Strategic Management Journal, 34(4), 464-482. https://doi.org/10.1002/SMJ.2022
Choi, J. J., Jiang, C., & Shenkar, O. (2015). The quality of local government and firm performance: The case of China’s provinces. Management and Organization Review, 11(4), 679-710. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2015.46
Dang, C., (F.) Li, Z., & Yang, C. (2018). Measuring firm size in empirical corporate finance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 86, 159-176. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.09.006
Dang, V. Q. (2016). The impact of corruption on provincial development performance in Vietnam. Crime, Law and Social Change, 65(4-5), 325-350. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10611-016-9608-8/FIGURES/5
Delen, D., Kuzey, C., & Uyar, A. (2013). Measuring firm performance using financial ratios: A decision tree approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(10), 3970-3983. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESWA.2013.01.012
Fan, Q., Kuper, P., Choi, Y. H., & Choi, S.-J. (2021). Does ICT development curb firms’ perceived corruption pressure? The contingent impact of institutional qualities and competitive conditions. Journal of Business Research, 135, 496-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.06.062
Fiorino, N., Galli, E., & Sapienza’, L. (2012). Corruption and Growth: Evidence from the Italian Regions. European Journal of Government and Economics, 1(2), 126-144.
Fisman, R., & Svensson, J. (2007). Are corruption and taxation really harmful to growth? Firm level evidence. Journal of Development Economics, 83(1), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.09.009
Gebauer, H., Fleisch, E., Lamprecht, C., & Wortmann, F. (2020). Growth paths for overcoming the digitalization paradox. Business Horizons, 63(3), 313-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2020.01.005
Goel, R. K., & Saunoris, J. W. (2022). Corrupt thy neighbor? New evidence of corruption contagion from bordering nations. Journal of Policy Modeling, 44(3), 635-652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2022.05.004
Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114-135. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166664
Guo, X., Li, M., Wang, Y., & Mardani, A. (2023). Does digital transformation improve the firm’s performance? From the perspective of digitalization paradox and managerial myopia. Journal of Business Research, 163, Article 113868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113868
Huynh, L. T. D., Hoang, H. T., & Tran, H. N. (2023). Does FDI enhance provincial productivity? A panel data analysis in Vietnam. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 28(3), 1174-1195. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2021.1967023
Jensen, M. C. (1996). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. In J. S. Bhandari & L. A. Weiss (Eds.), Corporate bankruptcy (1st ed., pp. 11-16). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609435.005
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (2019). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. In Corporate governance (pp. 77-132). Gower.
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Zoido, P. (1999). Governance matters. https://ssrn.com/abstract=188568
Krueger, A. O. (2008). The political economy of the rent-seeking society. In 40 years of research on rent seeking 2 (pp. 151-163). Springer.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79247-5_8
Leff, N. H. (1964). Economic development through bureaucratic corruption. American Behavioral Scientist, 8(3), 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276426400800303
Liên đoàn Thương mại và Công nghiệp Việt Nam. (2006). Báo cáo PCI 2006 [PCI report 2006]. https://pcivietnam.vn/an-pham/bao-cao-pci-2006-ct166
Lui, F. T. (1985). An equilibrium queuing model of bribery. Journal of Political Economy, 93(4), 760-781. https://doi.org/10.1086/261329
Martins, J., & Veiga, L. G. (2022). Digital government as a business facilitator. Information Economics and Policy, 60, Article 100990. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INFOECOPOL.2022.100990
Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 681-712. https://doi.org/10.2307/2946696
Méon, P.-G., & Sekkat, K. (2005). Does corruption grease or sand the wheels of growth? Public Choice, 122(1-2), 69-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-005-3988-0
Méon, P.-G., & Weill, L. (2010). Is corruption an efficient grease? World Development, 38(3), 244-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.06.004
Milani, F. (2019). Digital business analysis. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05719-0
Nguyen, T. T., & van Dijk, M. A. (2012). Corruption, growth, and governance: Private vs. state-owned firms in Vietnam. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(11), 2935-2948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.03.027
Nguyen, T. V., Le, N. T. B., Dinh, H. L. H., & Pham, H. T. L. (2020). Greasing, rent-seeking bribes and firm growth: Evidence from garment and textile firms in Vietnam. Crime, Law and Social Change, 74(3), 227-243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-020-09893-3
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
Okunogbe, O., & Pouliquen, V. (2022). Technology, taxation, and corruption: Evidence from the introduction of electronic tax filing. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 14(1), 341-372. https://doi.org/10.1257/POL.20200123
Pauwels, K., & Weiss, A. (2008). Moving from free to fee: How online firms market to change their business model successfully. Journal of Marketing, 72(3), 14-31. https://doi.org/10.1509/JMKG.72.3.014
Petersen, M. A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 435-480. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn053
Phan, M. H., & Archer, L. (2020). Corruption and SME financing structure: The case of Vietnamese manufacturing. Journal of Economics and Development, 22(2), 265-279. https://doi.org/10.1108/JED-12-2019-0074
Priya, P., & Sharma, C. (2023). Reinforcing the effects of corruption and financial constraints on firm performance: Normal versus crisis period in developing economies. Economic Modelling, 127, Article 106463. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECONMOD.2023.106463
Richard, P. J., Devinney, T. M., Yip, G. S., & Johnson, G. (2009). Measuring organizational performance: Towards methodological best practice. Journal of Management, 35(3), 718-804. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308330560;PAGE:STRING:ARTICLE/CHAPTER
Seiam, D. A., & Salman, D. (2024). Examining the global influence of e-governance on corruption: A panel data analysis. Future Business Journal, 10(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/S43093-024-00319-3
Sharma, C., & Mitra, A. (2015). Corruption, governance and firm performance: Evidence from Indian enterprises. Journal of Policy Modeling, 37(5), 835-851. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPOLMOD.2015.05.001
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1993). Corruption. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=227027
Tran, H. D., Bui, T. H., & Le, C. V. (2022). Quantifying productivity gains from foreign direct investment: The mediating role of provincial institutional quality. Finance Research Letters, 49, Article 103174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103174
Tran, T. Q., Vu, H. V., Doan, T. T., & Tran, H. D. (2016). Corruption, provincial institutions and manufacturing firm productivity: New evidence from a transitional economy. Estudios de Economía, 43(2), 199-215.
Tran, V. T., Walle, Y. M., & Herwartz, H. (2020). The impact of local financial development on firm growth in Vietnam: Does the level of corruption matter? European Journal of Political Economy, 62, Article 101858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101858
Van, H. T. C., Nguyen. T. C., Pham, T. T. T., & Nguyen, D. (2024). Does corruption grease or sand the wheels of firm productivity? Evidence of a non-linear relationship from a firm-level analysis in Vietnam. Journal of Economic Studies, 51(4), 919-941. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-02-2023-0092
Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801-814. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1986.4283976
Vial, V., & Hanoteau, J. (2010). Corruption, manufacturing plant growth, and the Asian Paradox: Indonesian evidence. World Development, 38(5), 693-705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.11.022
Vo, D. H., & Tran, N. P. (2024). Does digital transformation moderate the effect of intellectual capital on firm performance? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 16(2), 9266-9288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02270-8
Vu, H. V., Tran, T. Q., Nguyen, T. V., & Lim, S. (2018). Corruption, types of corruption and firm financial performance: New evidence from a transitional economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(4), 847-858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3016-y
Wang, H., Feng, J., Zhang, H., & Li, X. (2020). The effect of digital transformation strategy on performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 31(3), 441-462. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-09-2019-0166
Wang, S., Zhao, D., & Chen, H. (2020). Government corruption, resource misallocation, and ecological efficiency. Energy Economics, 85, Article 104573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104573
Wang, Y., & You, J. (2012). Corruption and firm growth: Evidence from China. China Economic Review, 23(2), 415-433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2012.03.003
Wei, L., & Li, M. (2024). Digital transformation, financing constraints and firm growth performance–From the perspective of financing channels. Finance Research Letters, 63, Article 105272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105272
Wei, S.-J., & Shleifer, A. (2000). Local corruption and global capital flows. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2000(2), 303-354.
World Economic Forum. (2020). How governments can leverage policy and blockchain technology to stunt public corruption. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2020/06/governments-leverage-blockchain-public-procurement-corruption/
Zhang, H., & Zhang, J. (2023). Political corruption and accounting choices. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 50(3-4), 443-481. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12646
Zhao, X., Sun, X., Zhao, L., & Xing, Y. (2022). Can the digital transformation of manufacturing enterprises promote enterprise innovation? Business Process Management Journal, 28(4), 960-982. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-01-2022-0018/FULL/XML
Tải xuống
Ngày nộp: 21-07-2025Ngày duyệt đăng: 10-11-2025Ngày xuất bản: 06-03-2026Thống kê truy cập
Trang tóm tắt: 498 PDF: 341Cách trích dẫn
Trần, T. T. Q., Nguyễn, V. T. S., Đoàn, T. T. H., & Trần, N. H. (2026). Ảnh hưởng của tham nhũng đến hiệu quả hoạt động của các doanh nghiệp Việt Nam: Vai trò điều tiết của chuyển đổi số. TẠP CHÍ KHOA HỌC ĐẠI HỌC MỞ THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH - KINH TẾ VÀ QUẢN TRỊ KINH DOANH, 21(3), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.vi.21.3.4615.2026Tải xuống trích dẫnGiấy phép
Bản quyền (c) 2026 Trần Thị Thảo Quyên; Nguyễn Văn Tiến Sơn; Đoàn Thị Thanh Hòa; Trần Ngọc Hòa
Tác phẩm này được cấp phép theo Giấy phép quốc tế Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 .
Tài nguyên của tác giả
Indexing
- Nguyễn Văn Tiến Sơn sonnvt@ueh.edu.vn