Sự đắm chìm trong trải nghiệm thực tế ảo ảnh hưởng đến sự hiện diện không gian của sinh viên Trường Công nghệ và Thiết kế - Đại học Kinh tế Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh
Các tác giả
-
Nguyễn Thị Thanh Huyền
ntthuyen@ueh.edu.vn
Đại học Kinh tế Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Việt Namhttps://orcid.org/0009-0008-9722-548X
- Trịnh Thuỳ Anh
Đại học Kinh tế Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Việt Nam- Dương Thị Thuỳ Trang
Đại học Kinh tế Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Việt Nam- Hoàng Việt Linh
Đại học Kinh tế Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Việt Nam- Hà Hoàng Minh Trang
Đại học Kinh tế Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Việt NamDOI:
10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.vi.20.6.3700.2025Từ khóa:
hiện diện không gian; sự đắm chìm; thực tế ảoPhân loại JEL:
M300; O300; M100Tóm tắt
Hiện nay công nghệ thực tế ảo (Virtual Reality - VR) đã nhận được nhiều sự chú ý từ các nhà nghiên cứu. Dựa trên lý thuyết ngây thơ (naive theory), nhóm nghiên cứu đã đề xuất mô hình khái niệm với hai câu hỏi nghiên cứu: (1) Việc đắm chìm trong trải nghiệm công nghệ thực tế ảo ảnh hưởng đến sự hiện diện không gian (spatial presence) như thế nào; (2) Đánh giá vai trò trung gian của sự dễ dàng tưởng tượng trong mối quan hệ giữa việc đắm chìm trong trải nghiệm thực tế ảo và sự hiện diện không gian. Nghiên cứu áp dụng lý thuyết ngây thơ và kết quả của nghiên cứu cho thấy việc đắm chìm trong trải nghiệm công nghệ thực tế ảo có tác động tích cực đến sự hiện diện không gian và sự dễ dàng tưởng tượng đóng vai trò trung gian trong mối quan hệ tích cực giữa việc đắm chìm trong trải nghiệm thực tế ảo và sự hiện diện không gian. Nghiên cứu thực hiện khảo sát với 195 sinh viên tại Trường Công nghệ và Thiết kế, Đại học Kinh tế Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh ở không gian trải nghiệm thực tế ảo. Kết quả của nghiên cứu giúp cung cấp mở rộng tài liệu nghiên cứu về trải nghiệm công nghệ thực tế ảo, sự đắm chìm và sự hiện diện không gian trong phạm vi thực nghiệm.Tải xuống
Dữ liệu tải xuống chưa có sẵn.Tài liệu tham khảo
Alcañiz, M., Bigné, E., & Guixeres, J. (2019). Virtual reality in marketing: A framework, review, and research agenda. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1-15.
Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(3), 219-235.
Berg, L. P., & Vance, J. M. (2017). Industry use of virtual reality in product design and manufacturing: A survey. Virtual Reality, 21(1), 1-17.
Biocca, F. (1992). Virtual reality technology: A tutorial. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 23-72.
Bonetti, F., Warnaby, G., & Quinn, L. (2018). Augmented reality and virtual reality in physical and online retailing: A review, synthesis and research agenda. In T. Jung & M. T. Dieck (Eds.), Augmented reality and virtual reality (pp. 119-132). Springer.
Boyd, D. E., & Koles, B. (2019). Virtual reality and its impact on B2B marketing: A value-in-use perspective. Journal of Business Research, 100, 590-598.
Brooks, F. P. (1999). What’s real about virtual reality? IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications, 19(6), 16-27.
Campbell, D. A., & Wells, M. (1994). A critique of virtual reality in the architectural design process. Report No. 4-94-3: Human Interface Technology Laboratory (HITL), 3(2), 1-7.
Carmigniani, J., & Furht, B. (2011). Augmented reality: An overview. Handbook of Augmented Reality, 3-46.
Chan, E. Y., & Northey, G. (2021). Luxury goods in online retail: How high/low positioning influences consumer processing fluency and preference. Journal of Business Research, 132, 136-145.
Chen, S. C., Chou, T. H., Hongsuchon, T., Ruangkanjanases, A., Kittikowit, S., & Lee, T. C. (2022). The mediation effect of marketing activities toward augmented reality: The perspective of extended customer experience. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 3(3), 461-480.
Chylinski, M., Heller, J., Hilken, T., Keeling, D. I., Mahr, D., & de Ruyter, K. (2020). Augmented reality marketing: A technology-enabled approach to situated customer experience. Australasian Marketing Journal, 28(4), 374-384.
Cowan, K., & Ketron, S. (2019). A dual model of product involvement for effective virtual reality: The roles of imagination, co-creation, telepresence, and interactivity. Journal of Business Research, 100, 483-492.
Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. (2010). What are the learning affordances of 3‐D virtual environments? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 10-32.
Di Serio, Á., Ibáñez, M. B., & Kloos, C. D. (2013). Impact of an augmented reality system on students’ motivation for a visual art course. Computers & Education, 68, 586-596.
Ding, A. C. E., Huang, K. T. T., DuBois, J., & Fu, H. (2024). Integrating immersive virtual reality technology in scaffolded game-based learning to enhance low motivation students’ multimodal science learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(4), 2083-2102.
Duncan, C. P., & Nelson, J. E. (1985). Effects of humor in a radio advertising experiment. Journal of Advertising, 14(2), 33-64.
Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 7-22.
Flavia ́n, C., Ib ́an ̃ez-S ́anchez, S., Orús, C. (2019). The impact of virtual, augmented and mixed reality technologies on the customer experience. Journal of Business Research, 100, 547-560.
Foulsham, T., Walker, E., & Kingstone, A. (2011). The where, what and when of gaze allocation in the lab and the natural environment. Vision Research, 51(17), 1920-1931.
Freeman, G., Bardzell, J., & Bardzell, S. (2020). Democratizing design: A practice-based approach to virtual reality applications for enterprise. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1-13). ACM.
Gelman, S. A. (2006). Naive theories, development of. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470018860 .s00520
Goodhue, D. L., Lewis, W., & Thompson, R. (2012). Does PLS have advantages for small sample size or non-normal data? MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 981-1001.
Hair, J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: Updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107-123.
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152.
Heeter, C. (2003). Reflections on real presence by a virtual person. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12(4), 335-345.
Held, R., & Durlach, N. (1992). Telepresence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(1), 109-112.
Heller, J., Chylinski, M., de Ruyter, K., Mahr, D., & Keeling, D. I. (2019). Let me imagine that for you: Transforming the retail frontline through augmenting customer mental imagery ability. Journal of Retailing, 95(2), 94-114.
Higgins, E. T. (1996). The “self digest”: Self-knowledge serving self-regulatory functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(6), 1062-1083.
Hilken, T., Chylinski, M., Keeling, D. I., Heller, J., de Ruyter, K., & Mahr, D. (2022). How to strategically choose or combine augmented and virtual reality for improved online experiential retailing. Psychology & Marketing, 39(3), 495-507.
Hilken, T., De Ruyter, K., Chylinski, M., Mahr, D., & Keeling, D. I. (2017). Augmenting the eye of the beholder: Exploring the strategic potential of augmented reality to enhance online service experiences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45, 884-905.
Huang, Y. C., Backman, K. F., Backman, S. J., & Chang, L. L. (2016). Exploring the implications of virtual reality technology in tourism marketing: An integrated research framework. International Journal of Tourism Research, 18(2), 116-128.
Huang, Y., Li, C., Wu, J., & Lin, Z. (2018). Online customer reviews and consumer evaluation: The role of review font. Information & Management, 55(4), 430-440.
Kock, N. (2017). Common method bias: A full collinearity assessment method for PLS-SEM. In H. Latan & R. Noonan (Eds.), Partial least squares path modeling. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64069-3_11
Lee, K. M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14(1), 27-50.
Lessiter, J., Freeman, J., Keogh, E., & Davidoff, J. (2001). A cross-media presence questionnaire: The ITC-sense of presence inventory. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 10(3), 282-297.
Li, G., Xi, N., Yu, M., & Fung, W. K. (2004). Development of augmented reality system for AFM-based nanomanipulation. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 9(2), 358-365.
Li, H., Daugherty, T., & Biocca, F. (2002). Impact of 3-D advertising on product knowledge, brand attitude, and purchase intention: The mediating role of presence. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 43-57.
Loureiro, S. M. C., Guerreiro, J., & Ali, F. (2020). 20 years of research on virtual reality and augmented reality in tourism context: A text-mining approach. Tourism Management, 77, Article 104028.
McGlone, M. S., & Tofighbakhsh, J. (2000). Birds of a feather flock conjointly (?): Rhyme as reason in aphorisms. Psychological Science, 11(5), 424-428.
Melo, M., Coelho, H., Gonçalves, G., Losada, N., Jorge, F., Teixeira, M. S., & Bessa, M. (2022). Immersive multisensory virtual reality technologies for virtual tourism: A study of the user’s sense of presence, satisfaction, emotions, and attitudes. Multimedia Systems, 28(3), 1027-1037.
Menon, G., & Raghubir, P. (2003). Ease-of-retrieval as an automatic input in judgments: A mere-accessibility framework? Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 230-243.
Minsky, M. (1980). Telepresence. Omni, 2, 45-51.
Mutterlein, J. (2018). The three pillars of virtual reality? Investigating the roles of immersion, presence, and interactivity. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Nash, E. B., Edwards, G. W., Thompson, J. A., & Barfield, W. (2000). A review of presence and performance in virtual environments. International Journal of Human-computer Interaction, 12(1), 1-41.
Nee, A. Y., Ong, S. K., Chryssolouris, G., & Mourtzis, D. (2012). Augmented reality applications in design and manufacturing. CIRP Annals, 61(2), 657-679.
Novemsky, N., Dhar, R., Schwarz, N., & Simonson, I. (2007). Preference fluency in choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(3), 347-356.
Nowlis, S. M., Mandel, N., & McCabe, D. B. (2004). The effect of a delay between choice and consumption on consumption enjoyment. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 502-510.
Ong, S. K., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2004). A brief introduction of VR and AR applications in manufacturing. In S. K. Ong & A. Y. C. Nee (Eds.), Virtual and augmented reality applications in manufacturing (pp. 1-14). Springer.
Orús, C., Gurrea, R., & Flavián, C. (2017). Facilitating imaginations through online product presentation videos: Effects on imagery fluency, product attitude, and purchase intention. Electronic Commerce Research, 17, 661-700.
Orús, C., Gurrea, R., & Ibáñez-Sánchez, S. (2019). The impact of consumers’ positive online recommendations on the omnichannel webrooming experience. Spanish Journal of Marketing-ESIC, 23(3), 397-414.
Peng, D. X., & Lai, F. (2012). Using partial least squares in operations management research: A practical guideline and summary of past research. Journal of Operations Management, 30(6), 467-480.
Peukert, C., Pfeiffer, J., Meißner, M., Pfeiffer, T., & Weinhardt, C. (2019). Shopping in virtual reality stores: The influence of immersion on system adoption. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36(3), 755-788.
Pizzi, G., Scarpi, D., Pichierri, M., & Vannucci, V. (2019). Virtual reality, real reactions? Comparing consumers’ perceptions and shopping orientation across physical and virtual-reality retail stores. Computers in Human Behavior, 96, 1-12.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147, Article 103778.
Reber, R., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth. Consciousness and Cognition, 8(3), 338-342.
Rennekamp, K. (2012). Processing fluency and investors’ reactions to disclosure readability. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(5), 1319-1354.
Saunders, M. (2009). Research methods for business students. Person Education Limited.
Schubert, T., Friedmann, F., & Regenbrecht, H. (2001). The experience of presence: Factor analytic insights. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 10(3), 266-281.
Schuemie, M. J., van der Straaten, P., Krijn, M., & van der Mast, C. A. P. G. (2001). Research on presence in virtual reality: A survey. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 4(2), 183-201.
Schwarz, N. (2004). Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision-making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(4), 332-348.
Shih, C. F. (1998). Conceptualizing consumer experiences in cyberspace. European Journal of Marketing, 32(7/8), 655-663.
Slater, M. (1999). Measuring presence: A response to the witmer and singer presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 8(5), 560-565.
Slater, M. (2018). Immersion and the illusion of presence in virtual reality. British Journal of Psychology, 109(3), 431-433.
Slater, M., & Wilbur, S. (1997). A Framework for Immersive Virtual Environments (FIVE): Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 6(6), 603-616.
Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. (1989). Person memory and judgment. Psychological Review, 96(1), 58-83.
Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 73-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992. tb00812.x
Sung, E., Bae, S., Han, D.-I.D., & Kwon, O. (2021). Consumer engagement via interactive artificial intelligence and mixed reality. International Journal of Information Management, 60, Article 102382.
Tan, Y. C., Chandukala, S. R., & Reddy, S. K. (2022). Augmented reality in retail and its impact on sales. Journal of Marketing, 86(1), 48-66.
Topolinski, S. (2014). A processing fluency-account of funniness: Running gags and spoiling punchlines. Cognition & Emotion, 28(5), 811-820.
Wänke, M., Bohner, G., & Jurkowitsch, A. (1997). There are many reasons to drive a BMW: Does imagined ease of argument generation influence attitudes? Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 170-177.
Wedel, M., Bigné, E., & Zhang, J. (2020). Virtual and augmented reality: Advancing research in consumer marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 37(3), 443-465.
Witmer, B. G., & Singer, M. J. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence, 7(3), 225-240.
Wu, R., Chen, J., Wang, C. L., & Zhou, L. (2022). The influence of emoji meaning multipleness on perceived online review helpfulness: The mediating role of processing fluency. Journal of Business Research, 141, 299-307.
Tải xuống
Ngày nộp: 28-08-2024Ngày duyệt đăng: 20-12-2024Ngày xuất bản: 13-01-2025Thống kê truy cập
Trang tóm tắt: 837 PDF: 588Cách trích dẫn
Huyền, N. T. T., Anh, T. T., Trang, D. T. T., Linh, H. V., & Trang, H. H. M. (2025). Sự đắm chìm trong trải nghiệm thực tế ảo ảnh hưởng đến sự hiện diện không gian của sinh viên Trường Công nghệ và Thiết kế - Đại học Kinh tế Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh. TẠP CHÍ KHOA HỌC ĐẠI HỌC MỞ THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH - KINH TẾ VÀ QUẢN TRỊ KINH DOANH, 20(6), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.vi.20.6.3700.2025Tải xuống trích dẫnGiấy phép
Bản quyền (c) 2025 Nguyễn Thị Thanh Huyền; Trịnh Thuỳ Anh; Dương Thị Thuỳ Trang; Hoàng Việt Linh; Hà Hoàng Minh Trang
Tác phẩm này được cấp phép theo Giấy phép quốc tế Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 .
- Trịnh Thuỳ Anh