--

20(3)2025

Phân tích trắc lượng thư mục về mối quan hệ giữa tăng trưởng kinh tế và bền vững môi trường


Tác giả - Nơi làm việc:
Bùi Hoàng Ngọc - Trường Đại học Công Thương Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh , Việt Nam
Nguyễn Huỳnh Mai Trâm - Trường Đại học Mở Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh , Việt Nam
Nguyễn Minh Hà - Trường Đại học Mở Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh , Việt Nam
Tác giả liên hệ, Email: Nguyễn Huỳnh Mai Trâm - tramnhm.20ae@ou.edu.vn
Ngày nộp: 29-07-2024
Ngày duyệt đăng: 22-11-2024
Ngày xuất bản: 13-01-2025

Tóm tắt
Nghiên cứu này cung cấp bản đồ kiến thức về mối quan hệ giữa tăng trưởng kinh tế và bền vững môi trường thông qua phân tích các bài báo từ năm 1990 - 2024. Áp dụng phương pháp trắc lượng thư mục, nghiên cứu trả lời các câu hỏi về xu hướng xuất bản, ảnh hưởng của các tác giả, cơ quan, quốc gia, tạp chí và các bài báo được trích dẫn nhiều nhất. Kết quả cho thấy, từ 2013 - 2024, số lượng nghiên cứu tăng gấp 39 lần, trong đó Trung Quốc, Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ và Mỹ có nhiều công bố nhất. Những kết luận này phản ánh mối quan tâm toàn cầu ngày càng lớn đối với tác động của tăng trưởng kinh tế đến môi trường, đặc biệt ở các quốc gia công nghiệp hóa và có tốc độ phát triển nhanh. Nghiên cứu khuyến nghị hợp tác quốc tế giữa các quốc gia có mức độ ô nhiễm khác nhau, nhằm tạo nền tảng cho các chính sách cân bằng giữa tăng trưởng kinh tế và bảo vệ môi trường, đồng thời giúp định hướng các nghiên cứu tiếp theo trong lĩnh vực này.

Chỉ số JEL
A1; O4; Q5

Từ khóa
bền vững môi trường; dữ liệu của Web of Science; tăng trưởng kinh tế; trắc lượng thư mục

Toàn văn:
PDF

Trích dẫn:

Bui, N. H., Nguyen, T. H. M., & Nguyen, H. M. (2025). Phân tích trắc lượng thư mục về mối quan hệ giữa tăng trưởng kinh tế và bền vững môi trường [A bibliometric analysis of economic growth-nvironmental sustainability nexus]. Tạp chí Khoa học Đại học Mở Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh – Kinh tế và Quản trị Kinh doanh, 20(3), 3-19. doi:10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.vi.20.3.3597.2025


Tài liệu tham khảo

Abad-Segura, E., & González-Zamar, M. D. (2021). Sustainable economic development in higher education institutions: A global analysis within the SDGs framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 294, Article 126133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126133


Ahmed, Z., Asghar, M. M., Malik, M. N., & Nawaz, K. (2020). Moving towards a sustainable environment: The dynamic linkage between natural resources, human capital, urbanization, economic growth, and ecological footprint in China. Resources Policy, 67, Article 101677.


Alola, A. A., Bekun, F. V., & Sarkodie, S. A. (2019). Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe. Science of The Total Environment, 685, 702-709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.139


Aydoğan, B., & Vardar, G. (2020). Evaluating the role of renewable energy, economic growth and agriculture on CO2 emission in E7 countries. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 39(4), 335-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2019.1686380


Bashir, M. F., Ma, B., Bashir, M. A., Bilal, & Shahzad, L. (2021). Scientific data-driven evaluation of academic publications on environmental Kuznets curve. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(14), 16982-16999.


Bashir, M. F., Ma, B., Bilal, Komal, B., & Bashir, M. A. (2021). Analysis of environmental taxes publications: A bibliometric and systematic literature review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(16), 20700-20716.


Bekun, F. V., Alola, A. A., & Sarkodie, S. A. (2019). Toward a sustainable environment: Nexus between CO(2) emissions, resource rent, renewable and nonrenewable energy in 16-EU countries. Sci Total Environ, 657, 1023-1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.104


Bekhet, H. A., Matar, A., & Yasmin, T. (2017). CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, and financial development in GCC countries: Dynamic simultaneous equation models. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 117-132.


Berchin, I. I., de Aguiar Dutra, A. R., & Guerra, J. B. S. O. d. A. (2021). How do higher education institutions promote sustainable development? A literature review. Sustainable Development, 29(6), 1204-1222. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2219


Charfeddine, L., & Umlai, M. (2023). ICT sector, digitization and environmental sustainability: A systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2022. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 184, Article 113482.


D’Amato, D., Droste, N., Allen, B., Kettunen, M., Lähtinen, K., Korhonen, J., Leskinen, P., Matthies, B. D., & Toppinen, A. (2017). Green, circular, bio economy: A comparative analysis of sustainability avenues. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 716-734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.053


Demissew Beyene, S. (2023). Going beyond the traditional EKC hypothesis: A panel quantile approach. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 80(1), 93-112.


Fakher, H. A., Ahmed, Z., Acheampong, A. O., & Nathaniel, S. P. (2023). Renewable energy, nonrenewable energy, and environmental quality nexus: An investigation of the N-shaped Environmental Kuznets Curve based on six environmental indicators. Energy, 263, Article 125660.


Feng, K., Davis, S. J., Sun, L., Li, X., Guan, D., Liu, W., Liu, Z., & Hubacek, K. (2013). Outsourcing CO2 within China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(28), 11654-11659. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1219918110


Genovese, A., Acquaye, A. A., Figueroa, A., & Koh, S. C. L. (2017). Sustainable supply chain management and the transition towards a circular economy: Evidence and some applications. Omega, 66,  344-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.05.015


Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353-377.


Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569-16572.


Hou, Y., & Wang, Q. (2021). A bibliometric study about energy, environment, and climate change. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(26), 34187-34199.


Huang, J., Zhang, D., Zhang, Z., Kong, W., Yan, J., & Xia, F. (2023). Trapped in dilemma: Inverted N-shaped EKC evidence of economic growth and ecological land in a spatial spillover perspective. Applied Geography, 161, Article 103145.


Huang, Y., Chen, C., Su, D., & Wu, S. (2020). Comparison of leading-industrialisation and crossing-industrialisation economic growth patterns in the context of sustainable development: Lessons from China and India. Sustainable Development, 28(5), 1077-1085. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2058


Ikram, M., Xia, W., Fareed, Z., Shahzad, U., & Rafique, M. Z. (2021). Exploring the nexus between economic complexity, economic growth and ecological footprint: Contextual evidences from Japan. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 47, Article 101460.


Işık, C., Ongan, S., & Özdemir, D. (2019). Testing the EKC hypothesis for ten US states: An application of heterogeneous panel estimation method. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 10846-10853.


Isik, C., Ongan, S., & Özdemir, D. (2019). The economic growth/development and environmental degradation: Evidence from the US state-level EKC hypothesis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 30772-30781.


Le, H. T., & Quah, E. (2018). Income level and the emissions, energy, and growth nexus: Evidence from Asia and the Pacific. International Economics, 156, 193-205.


Li, J. S., Zhou, H., Meng, J., Yang, Q., Chen, B., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Carbon emissions and their drivers for a typical urban economy from multiple perspectives: A case analysis for Beijing city. Applied Energy, 226, 1076-1086.


Mao, G., Huang, N., Chen, L., & Wang, H. (2018). Research on biomass energy and environment from the past to the future: A bibliometric analysis. Science of The Total Environment, 635, 1081-1090.


Mensah, C. N., Long, X., Boamah, K. B., Bediako, I. A., Dauda, L., & Salman, M. (2018). The effect of innovation on CO2 emissions of OCED countries from 1990 to 2014. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 29678-29698.


Özkan, O., Degirmenci, T., Destek, M. A., & Aydin, M. (2024). Unlocking time-quantile impact of energy vulnerability, financial development, and political globalization on environmental sustainability in Turkey: Evidence from different pollution indicators. Journal of Environmental Management, 365, Article 121499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121499


Pandey, K. K., & Rastogi, H. (2019). Effect of energy consumption & economic growth on environmental degradation in India: A time series modelling. Energy Procedia, 158, 4232-4237.


Pata, U. K., & Aydin, M. (2020). Testing the EKC hypothesis for the top six hydropower energy-consuming countries: Evidence from Fourier Bootstrap ARDL procedure. Journal of Cleaner Production, 264, Article 121699.


Pata, U. K., & Samour, A. (2022). Do renewable and nuclear energy enhance environmental quality in France? A new EKC approach with the load capacity factor. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 149, Article 104249.


Purvis, B., Mao, Y., & Robinson, D. (2018). Three pillars of sustainability: In search of conceptual origins. Sustainability Science, 14(3), 681-695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5


Rahman, M. M. (2020). Environmental degradation: The role of electricity consumption, economic growth and globalisation. Journal of Environmental Management, 253, Article 109742.


Raihan, A., & Tuspekova, A. (2022a). Role of economic growth, renewable energy, and technological innovation to achieve environmental sustainability in Kazakhstan. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 4, Article 100165.


Raihan, A., & Tuspekova, A. (2022b). Toward a sustainable environment: Nexus between economic growth, renewable energy use, forested area, and carbon emissions in Malaysia. Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances, 15, Article 200096.


Ridzuan, N. H. A. M., Marwan, N. F., Khalid, N., Ali, M. H., & Tseng, M. L. (2020). Effects of agriculture, renewable energy, and economic growth on carbon dioxide emissions: Evidence of the environmental Kuznets curve. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 160, Article 104879.


Sarkodie, S. A. (2018). The invisible hand and EKC hypothesis: What are the drivers of environmental degradation and pollution in Africa? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(22), 21993-22022.


Sarkodie, S. A., Adams, S., Owusu, P. A., Leirvik, T., & Ozturk, I. (2020). Mitigating degradation and emissions in China: The role of environmental sustainability, human capital and renewable energy. Science of The Total Environment, 719, Article 137530.


Sueyoshi, T., Yuan, Y., & Goto, M. (2017). A literature study for DEA applied to energy and environment. Energy Economics, 62, 104-124.


Tenaw, D., & Beyene, A. D. (2021). Environmental sustainability and economic development in sub-Saharan Africa: A modified EKC hypothesis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 143, Article 110897.


Tran, H. V., Tran, A. V., & Nguyen, T. H. M. (2024). Asymmetric effects of foreign direct investment and globalization on ecological footprint in Indonesia. Plos One, 19(1), Article e0297046.


Uddin, G. A., Alam, K., & Gow, J. (2016). Does ecological footprint impede economic growth? An empirical analysis based on the environmental kuznets curve hypothesis. Australian Economic Papers, 55(3), 301-316.


Udemba, E. N. (2020). A sustainable study of economic growth and development amidst ecological footprint: New insight from Nigerian perspective. Science of The Total Environment, 732, Article 139270.


Ulucak, R., & Bilgili, F. (2018). A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle and low income countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 144-157.


Umar, M., Ji, X., Kirikkaleli, D., Shahbaz, M., & Zhou, X. (2020). Environmental cost of natural resources utilization and economic growth: Can China shift some burden through globalization for sustainable development? Sustainable Development, 28(6), 1678-1688. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2116


Üngör, Ç. (2024). A ‘bridge’ pushed to the periphery? Turkey’s geopolitical significance in the Asia-Pacific century. Turkish Studies, 26(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2024.2391812


Usman, M., Kousar, R., Yaseen, M. R., & Makhdum, M. S. A. (2020). An empirical nexus between economic growth, energy utilization, trade policy, and ecological footprint: A continent-wise comparison in upper-middle-income countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(31), 38995-39018.


Wang, Q., Zhang, F., Li, R., & Li, L. (2022). The impact of renewable energy on decoupling economic growth from ecological footprint - An empirical analysis of 166 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 354, Article 131706.


Wang, Z., Zhao, Y., & Wang, B. (2018). A bibliometric analysis of climate change adaptation based on massive research literature data. Journal of Cleaner Production, 199, 1072-1082.


Yildiran, M. (2019). The Chinese vision of BRI and its effects on Turkey and West Asia. In J. Syed & Y. H. Ying (Eds.), China’s belt and road initiative in a global context: Volume I: A business and management perspective (pp. 211-234). Springer International Publishing.


Zafar, M. W., Zaidi, S. A. H., Khan, N. R., Mirza, F. M., Hou, F., & Kirmani, S. A. A. (2019). The impact of natural resources, human capital, and foreign direct investment on the ecological footprint: The case of the United States. Resources Policy, 63, Article 101428.


Zambrano-Monserrate, M. A., & Fernandez, M. A. (2017). An environmental kuznets curve for N2O emissions in Germany: An ARDL approach. Natural Resources Forum, 41(2), 119-127.


Zhang, K., Wang, Q., Liang, Q. M., & Chen, H. (2016). A bibliometric analysis of research on carbon tax from 1989 to 2014. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 58, 297-310.



Creative Commons License
© The Author(s) 2025. This is an open access publication under CC BY NC licence.