--

19(2)2024

Mối quan hệ giữa trách nhiệm xã hội và kết quả hoạt động bền vững doanh nghiệp: Vai trò trung gian của năng lực xanh và thu mua xanh của các doanh nghiệp Việt Nam


Tác giả - Nơi làm việc:
Lê Thanh Tiệp - Trường Đại học Kinh tế - Tài chính Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh , Việt Nam
Tác giả liên hệ, Email: Lê Thanh Tiệp - tieplt@uef.edu.vn
Ngày nộp: 30-09-2023
Ngày duyệt đăng: 17-11-2023
Ngày xuất bản: 07-02-2024

Tóm tắt
Nghiên cứu này kiểm tra tầm quan trọng của Trách Nhiệm Xã Hội doanh nghiệp (TNXH) đối với Kết Quả Hoạt Động Bền Vững (KQHDBV) của các doanh nghiệp vừa và nhỏ (SMEs) tại Việt Nam. Bên cạnh đó, mối liên hệ trung gian của Năng Lực Xanh (NLX) và Thu Mua Xanh (TMX) cũng được làm rõ. Cùng với đó, lý thuyết quan điểm dựa trên nguồn lực (RBV) và lý thuyết các bên liên quan cùng được sử dụng nhằm đóng góp vào sự hiểu biết đa chiều cho các hiện tượng được nghiên cứu hiện nay. Phương pháp nghiên cứu được lựa chọn dùng cho phân tích là phương pháp định tính và phương pháp định lượng. Dữ liệu nghiên cứu dựa trên ý kiến từ 438 quản lý cấp trung và quản lý cấp cao của các doanh nghiệp tại Việt Nam. Từ dữ liệu nhận về, bài nghiên cứu đã kết luận về các vấn đề cũng như đề xuất các giải pháp và bước phát triển của công ty thông qua mối liên hệ của TNXH và KQHDBV của các SMEs đến với các nhà quản lý để họ có thể đề xuất các chiến lược toàn diện hơn cho công ty thông qua vai trò trung gian của năng lực xanh và thu mua xanh.

Chỉ số JEL
M14; O31; P17

Từ khóa
kết quả hoạt động bền vững của doanh nghiệp; kinh tế mới nổi; năng lực xanh; thu mua xanh; trách nhiệm xã hội của doanh nghiệp

Toàn văn:
PDF

Trích dẫn:

Le, T. T. (2024). Mối quan hệ giữa trách nhiệm xã hội và kết quả hoạt động bền vững doanh nghiệp: Vai trò trung gian của năng lực xanh và thu mua xanh của các doanh nghiệp Việt Nam [The relationship between corporate social responsibility and sustainable corporate performance: The mediating role of green capability and green procurement of Vietnam enterprises]. Tạp chí Khoa học Đại học Mở Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh – Kinh tế và Quản trị Kinh doanh, 19(2), 4-18. doi: 10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.vi.19.2.2991.2024


Tài liệu tham khảo

Abu-Jarad, I. Y., Yusof, N. A., & Nikbin, D. (2010). A review paper on organizational culture and organizational performance. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 1(3), 26-46.


Aggarwal, P., & Singh, A. K. (2019). CSR and sustainability reporting practices in India: An in-depth content analysis of top-listed companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 15(8), 1033-1053.


Al Amosh, H., & Khatib, S. F. (2021). Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure of sustainability performance: The case of Jordan. SN Business & Economics, 1(12), Article 165.


Andersen, J. (2021). A relational natural-resource-based view on product innovation: The influence of green product innovation and green suppliers on differentiation advantage in small manufacturing firms. Technovation, 104, Article 102254.


Arend, R. J. (2014). Social and environmental performance at SMEs: Considering motivations, capabilities, and instrumentalism. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 541-561. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1934-5


Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 197-218.


Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. doi:10.1177/014920639101700108


Baumgartner, H., & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing13(2), 139-161.


Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.


Carter, C. R., & Carter, J. R. (1998). Interorganizational determinants of environmental purchasing: Initial evidence from the consumer products industries. Decision Sciences, 29(3), 659-668.


Crisan-Mitra, C. S., Stanca, L., & Dabija, D. C. (2020). Corporate social performance: An assessment model on an emerging market. Sustainability, 12(10), Article 4077. doi:10.3390/su12104077


Dang, V. M., Ha, T. N., Ngo, N. T. V., Pham, T. H., & Duong, D. C. (2022). Environmental corporate social responsibility initiatives and green purchase intention: An application of the extended theory of planned behavior. Social Responsibility Journal, 18(8), 1627-1645.


Doll, W. J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. MIS Quarterly, 453-461.


Duong, D. C. (2023). Environmental corporate social responsibility initiatives and the attitude-intention-behavior gap in green consumption. Social Responsibility Journal, Vol. ahead-of-print No ahead-of-print. doi:10.1108/SRJ-11-2022-0487


Farooq, O., Rupp, D. E., & Farooq, M. (2017). The multiple pathways through which internal and external corporate social responsibility influence organizational identification and multifoci outcomes: The moderating role of cultural and social orientations. Academy of Management Journal, 60(3), 954-985.


Foo, M. Y., Kanapathy, K., Zailani, S., & Shaharudin, M. R. (2019). Green purchasing capabilities, practices and institutional pressure. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 30(5), 1171-1189.


Foo, M. Y., Mohd, R. S., Guoxin, M., Suhaiza, H. M. Z., & Kanagi, K. (2021). Green purchasing capabilities and practices towards firm’s triple bottom line in Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 307, Article 127268. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127268


Freeman, E. R., & Dmytriyev, S. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder theory: Learning from each other. Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, (1), 7-15. doi:10.4468/2017.1.02freeman.dmytriyev


Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.


Freeman, R. E., Dmytriyev, S., & Phillips, R. A. (2021). Stakeholder theory and the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1757-1770.


Galeazzo, A., Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N., & Delgado-Ceballos, J. (2021). Green procurement and financial performance in the tourism industry: The moderating role of tourists’ green purchasing behaviour. Current Issues in Tourism, 24(5), 700-716.


Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.


Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986-1014. doi:10.2307/258963


Hazaea, S. A., Al-Matari, E. M., Zedan, K., Khatib, S. F., Zhu, J., & Al Amosh, H. (2022). Green purchasing: Past, present and future. Sustainability14(9), Article 5008.


Helfat, C. E., & Winter, S. G. (2011). Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: Strategy for the (N) ever‐changing world. Strategic Management Journal, 32(11), 1243-1250.


Indriastuti, M., & Chariri, A. (2021). The role of green investment and corporate social responsibility investment on sustainable performance. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), Article 1960120.


Kraus, S., Rehman, S. U., & García, F. J. S. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and environmental performance: The mediating role of environmental strategy and green innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 160, 120262-120269. doi:10.1016/j. techfore.2020.120262


Kumar, P., Bhatt, V., & Murari, K. (2020). Does firm-size, profit and CSR-awareness impact an SME’s behaviour towards its employees: An exploratory Indian study. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(15), 1896-1906.


Khan, S. A. R. (2019). The nexus between carbon emissions, poverty, economic growth, and logistics operations-empirical evidence from southeast Asian countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(13), 13210-13220.


Le, T. T., Ngo, Q. H., & Aureliano-Silva, L. (2021). Contribution of corporate social responsibility on SMEs’ performance in an emerging market - The mediating roles of brand trust and brand loyalty. International Journal of Emerging Markets, Vol. ahead-of-print No ahead-of-print.


Le, T. T., Tran, Q. P., Lam, P. N., Ho Nguyen, M. L. T., & Dang, P. T.  (2023). Logistic service quality on young consumers’ repurchase intention: An empirical study in emerging economy. Operations Management Research, 16(4), 2174-2191.


Le, T. T., Tran, Q. P., Lam, P. N., Nguyen, M. L. T., & Ho (2023). Corporate social responsibility, green innovation, environment strategy and corporate sustainable development. Operations Management Research, 1-21.


Lee, K. H., & Shin, D. (2010). Consumers’ responses to CSR activities: The linkage between increased awareness and purchase intention. Public Relations Review, 36(2), 193-195.


Lo, H. W., Liou, J. J., Wang, H. S., & Tsai, Y. S. (2018). An integrated model for solving problems in green supplier selection and order allocation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 190, 339-352.


Nulkar, G. (2014). SMEs and environmental performance - A framework for green business strategies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 133, 130-140. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.177


Obeidat, B. Y. (2016). Exploring the relationship between corporate social responsibility, employee engagement, and organizational performance: The case of Jordanian mobile telecommunication companies. International Journal of Communications, Network and System Sciences, 9(9), Article 361.


Ordanini, A., & Rubera, G. (2008). Strategic capabilities and internet resources in procurement: A resource-based view of B-to-B buying process. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 28(1), 27-52.


Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879


Qiu, L., Jie, X., Wang, Y., & Zhao, M. (2020). Green product innovation, green dynamic capability, and competitive advantage: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 146-165. doi:10.1002/csr.1780


Ramachandran, V. (2011). Strategic corporate social responsibility: A ‘dynamic capabilities’ perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18(5), 285-293.


Ramakrishnan, P., Haron, H., & Goh, Y. N. (2015). Factors influencing green purchasing adoption for Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Society, 16(1).


Ranjan, S., & Yadav, R. S. (2018). Uncovering the role of internal CSR on organizational attractiveness and turnover intention: The effect of procedural justice and extraversion. Asian Social Science, 14(12), Article 76.


Rehman, S. U., Bresciani, S., Yahiaoui, D., & Giacosa, E. (2022). Environmental sustainability orientation and corporate social responsibility influence on environmental performance of small and medium enterprises: The mediating effect of green capability. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management29(6), 1954-1967.


Rehman, S. U., Mohamed, R., & Ayoup, H. (2019). The mediating role of organizational capabilities between organizational performance and its determinants. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 9(1), 1-23.


Shaharudin, M. R., Tan, K. C., Kannan, V., & Zailani, S. (2018). The mediating effects of product returns on the relationship between green capabilities and closed-loop supply chain adoption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 211, 233-246. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.035


Shahzad, M., Qu, Y., Zafar, A. U., Rehman, S. U., & Islam, T. (2020). Exploring the influence of knowledge management process on corporate sustainable performance through green innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(9), 2079-2106. doi:10.1108/JKM-11-2019-062


Sharma, M., Kumar, A., Luthra, S., Joshi, S., & Upadhyay, A. (2022). The impact of environmental dynamism on low‐carbon practices and digital supply chain networks to enhance sustainable performance: An empirical analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1776-1788.


Shi, X., & Liao, Z. (2013). Managing supply chain relationships in the hospitality services: An empirical study of hotels and restaurants. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 35, 112-121.


Singh, K., & Misra, M. (2021). Linking Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and organizational performance: The moderating effect of corporate reputation. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 27(1), Article 100139. doi:10.1016/j.iedeen.2020.100139


Tang, Z., & Tang, J. (2012). Stakeholder-firm power difference, stakeholders’ CSR orientation, and SMEs’ environmental performance in China. Journal of Business Venturing27(4), 436-455. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.11.007


Tang, Z., Hull, C. E., & Rothenberg, S. (2012). How corporate social responsibility engagement strategy moderates the CSR-financial performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 49(7), 1274-1303.


Toussaint, M., Cabanelas, P., & Muñoz-Dueñas, P. (2022). Social sustainability in the food value chain: What is and how to adopt an integrative approach? Quality & Quantity, 1-24.


Turker, D. (2009). How corporate social responsibility influences organizational commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 189-204.


Valdez-Juárez, L. E., Gallardo-Vázquez, D., & Ramos-Escobar, E. A. (2019). Organizational learning and corporate social responsibility drivers of performance in SMEs in Northwestern Mexico. Sustainability, 11(20), Article 5655.


Veronica, S., Alexeis, G. P., Valentina, C., & Elisa, G. (2019). Do stakeholder capabilities promote sustainable business innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises? Evidence from Italy. Journal of Business Research, 119, Article 131144. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.025


Wong, S. K. S. (2013). Environmental requirements, knowledge sharing and green innovation: Empirical evidence from the electronics industry in China. Business Strategy and the Environment22(5), 321-338. doi:10.1002/bse.1746


Yang, W., & Zhang, Y. (2012). Research on factors of green purchasing practices of Chinese. Journal of Business Management and Economics, 3(5), 222-231.


Yook, K. H., Choi, J. H., & Suresh, N. C. (2018). Linking green purchasing capabilities to environmental and economic performance: The moderating role of firm size. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 24(4), 326-337.


Yu, Z., Khan, S. A. R., & Liu, Y. (2020). Exploring the role of corporate social responsibility practices in enterprises. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems, 19(3), 449-461.


Yuan, B., & Cao, X. (2022). Do corporate social responsibility practices contribute to green innovation? The mediating role of green dynamic capability. Technology in Society68, Article 101868.


Zailani, S. H. M., Eltayeb, T. K., Hsu, C. C., & Tan, K. C. (2012). The impact of external institutional drivers and internal strategy on environmental performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(6), 721-745.


Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. H. (2013). Institutional-based antecedents and performance outcomes of internal and external green supply chain management practices. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 19(2), 106-117.



Creative Commons License
© The Author(s) 2024. This is an open access publication under CC BY NC licence.