--

4 (1) 2014

What do Vietnamese executives understand corporate social responsibility?


Author - Affiliation:
Le Thi Thanh Xuan - Hochiminh University of Technology , Vietnam
Lai Van Tai - Hochiminh University of Technology , Vietnam
Truong Thi Lan Anh - Hochiminh University of Technology , Vietnam
Corresponding author: Truong Thi Lan Anh - lttxuan@hcmut.edu.vn

Abstract
The Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) literature in developing countries is seriously meager. This paper explores CSR in the Vietnamese construction industry which has faced many scandals and directed attention toward the question of the responsibilities of these businesses. The study employs the CSR definition documented by Carroll (1979; 1991) to develop a framework for exploring executives’ perceptions towards CSR. Using Carroll’s CSR pyramid and adopting in-depth interview as a method to collect data, the study critically examines the personal understanding of managers in nine companies in the construction industry. The findings show that although Vietnam is a developing country, managers are aware of the significance of environmental issue as a responsibility that businesses must address. Moreover, the managers also believe that corporate contributions to society, and corporate reputation and prestige, are expectations of society. Despite many breakthroughs in executives’ understanding of CSR, they are not sufficiently and systematically aware of CSR and need a stronger supports, such as issuing appropriate policies, from government in adopting CSR in real business practice.


Keywords
Corporate Social Responsibility; Perception; Awareness; Developing Country

Full Text:
PDF

References

Agle, B R, Mitchell, R K & Sonnenfeld, J A 1999, ‘Who Matters to CEOs? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corporate Performance, and CEO Values’, The Academy of Management Journal, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 507-525.


Bateman, T S & Scott, S 2011, Management: leading and collaborating in a competitive world, 9th edn, McGraw-Hill Irwin, New York.


Berson, Y, Oreg, S & Dvir, T 2008, ‘CEO values, organizational culture and firm outcomes’, Journal of Organizational Behaviour, vol. 29, pp. 615-633.


Bo, P V 2009, ‘Vietnam country report’. in The 15th Asia construct conference, 2009, Kuala Lumpur Malaysia.


Boeije, H 2010, Analysis in qualitative research, SAGE, Los Angeles.


Carroll, a B 1979, ‘A three dimensional conceptual model for corporate peformance’, Academy of Management Review, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 497-505.


Carroll, a B 1991, ‘The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders’, Business Horizons, vol. 34, pp. 39-48.


Carroll, a B 1998, ‘The four faces of corporate citizenship’, Business and Society Review, vol. 100/101, pp. 1-7.


Chinh, N T 2008, ‘Environment issues in Corporate Social Responsibility’, International vision, vol. 12, pp. 77-86.


Ciulla, J B 1999, ‘The important of leadership in shaping business values’, Long Range Planning, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 166-172.


Dalton, D R & Cosier, R A 1982, ‘The four faces of social responsibility’, Business Horizons, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 19-27.


Flick, U, Kardorff, E V & Steinke, I (eds.) 2004, A companion to qualitative research, SAGE, London.


Gibson, W J & Andrew, B 2009, Working with qualitative data SAGE, London.


Huong, B T L 2008a, ‘The perspective on Corporate social responsibility in emerging countries: the case of Vietnam’, International vision, vol. 12, pp. 57-74.


Huong, N 2008b, ‘Corporate social responsibility in Vietnam: from history to date’, International vision, vol. 12, pp. 35-48.


Institute of Labour Science and Social Affairs 2004. Study on corporate social responsibility - labour-related practices. Study on Corporate Social Responsibility. Hanoi: Ministry of Labour-Invalids and Social affairs.


Jones, G R & George, J M 2008, Contemporary management, 5th edn, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, Boston.


Kotler, P & Lee, N 2005, Corporate social responsibility-Doing the most good for your comapny and your cause, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken, New Jersey.


Ling, F Y Y, Pham, V M C & Hoang, T P 2009, ‘Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats for Architectural, Engineering, and Construction Firms: Case Study of Vietnam’, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 135, no.10, pp. 1105-1113.


Miles, M B & Huberman, a M 1994, Qualitative data analysis : an expanded sourcebook, 2nd edn, SAGE, Thousand Oaks, Calif.


Murray, M & Dainty, A 2009, ‘Corporate social responsibility:challenging the construction industry’. in: Murray, M. & Dainty, A. (eds.), Corporate social responsibility in the construction industry, Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 3-23.


Nhu, T V 2008, ‘Efficiency of integrating corporate social responsibility and environmentally friendly technology’s application: a case study of leading coal manufacture company in Vietnam’, International vision, vol. 12, pp. 119-



Paine, L S 1996, ‘Moral thinking in management: An essential capability’, Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 477.


Porter, M E & Kramer, M R 2006, ‘Strategy and Society - The link between Competitive advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility’, Havard Business Review, vol. December 2006, pp. 78-92.


Quan, A 2010, ‘Development of the construction leading in production sector’, VnEconomy, 06 July 2010, http://vneconomy.vn/20100706101329701P0C17/tang-truong-nganh-xay-dung-dan-dau-khoi-san-xuat.htm.


Thang, T T N 2008, ‘Perception of corporate social responsibility in Vietnam’, International vision, vol. 12, pp. 107-118.


Waldman, D A & Siegel, D S 2008, ‘Defining the social responsible leader’, The Leadership Quarterly, vol. 19, pp. 117-131.



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.