From ambidextrous innovation to digital servitization: The moderating role of digital empowerment in Vietnamese Small and Medium-sized manufacturing Enterprises (SMEs)

Authors

DOI:

10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.en.16.2.5122.2026

Keywords:

innovation ambidexterity; digital servitization; digital empowerment; operational effectiveness; customer participation in value co-creation

JEL Classification:

O31; M15; L22

Abstract

This study investigates how innovation ambidexterity and digital empowerment jointly enable digital servitization and performance outcomes in manufacturing SMEs in an emerging economy context. Drawing on dynamic capabilities theory and the servitization/digitalization literature, we conceptualize exploratory and exploitative innovation as microfoundations of digital servitization and examine digital empowerment as an internal enabling condition. We propose that digital servitization, in turn, enhances both operational effectiveness and customer participation in value co-creation. Using survey data from 205 owners and CEOs of Vietnamese manufacturing SMEs and 5-point Likert scales, we test the research model with Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). The results show that both exploration and exploitation innovation positively influence digital servitization, with a stronger effect for exploration innovation. Digital empowerment significantly strengthens the relationship between exploitative innovation and digital servitization, but does not significantly moderate the exploratory innovation-digital servitization link. Digital servitization exerts significant positive effects on operational effectiveness and on customer participation in value co-creation, underscoring its significant role in translating innovation capabilities into both efficiency and relational gains. The study advances understanding of the microfoundations of digital servitization in manufacturing SMEs, nuances the role of digital empowerment as a contingent rather than universal amplifier of innovation ambidexterity. It provides actionable implications for SME leaders seeking to leverage digital tools, skills, and autonomy to turn innovation efforts into digitally enabled service offerings and improved performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abou-Foul, M., Ruiz-Alba, J. L., & Soares, A. (2020). The impact of digitalization and servitization on the financial performance of a firm: An empirical analysis. Production Planning & Control, 32(12), 975-989. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1780508

Allinson, C. W., & Hayes, J. (1996). The cognitive style index: A measure of intuition‐analysis for organizational research. Journal of Management Studies, 33(1), 119-135.

Almodóvar, P., & Nguyen, T. K. Q. (2022). Product innovation of domestic firms versus foreign MNE subsidiaries: The role of external knowledge sources. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 184, Article 122000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122000

Ardito, L., Besson, E., Petruzzelli, A. M., & Gregori, G. (2018). The influence of production, IT, and logistics process innovations on ambidexterity performance. Business Process Management Journal, 24(5), 1271-1284.

Becker, J.-M., Klein, K., & Wetzels, M. (2012). Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using reflective-formative type models. Long Range Planning, 45(5-6), 359-394.

Downloads

Received: 11-12-2025
Accepted: 25-02-2026
Published: 12-03-2026

Statistics Views

Abstract: 1080
PDF: 101

How to Cite

Thông, N. N., & Kieu, T. A. (2026). From ambidextrous innovation to digital servitization: The moderating role of digital empowerment in Vietnamese Small and Medium-sized manufacturing Enterprises (SMEs). HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, 16(2), 135–155. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.en.16.2.5122.2026