From ambidextrous innovation to digital servitization: The moderating role of digital empowerment in Vietnamese Small and Medium-sized manufacturing Enterprises (SMEs)
Authors
-
Nguyen Ngoc Thong
thong.nn@ou.edu.vn
Ho Chi Minh City Open University, Viet Namhttps://orcid.org/0009-0003-7974-9048
- Kieu Anh Tai
Ho Chi Minh City Open University, Viet Namhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0238-5958DOI:
10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.en.16.2.5122.2026Keywords:
innovation ambidexterity; digital servitization; digital empowerment; operational effectiveness; customer participation in value co-creationJEL Classification:
O31; M15; L22Abstract
This study investigates how innovation ambidexterity and digital empowerment jointly enable digital servitization and performance outcomes in manufacturing SMEs in an emerging economy context. Drawing on dynamic capabilities theory and the servitization/digitalization literature, we conceptualize exploratory and exploitative innovation as microfoundations of digital servitization and examine digital empowerment as an internal enabling condition. We propose that digital servitization, in turn, enhances both operational effectiveness and customer participation in value co-creation. Using survey data from 205 owners and CEOs of Vietnamese manufacturing SMEs and 5-point Likert scales, we test the research model with Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). The results show that both exploration and exploitation innovation positively influence digital servitization, with a stronger effect for exploration innovation. Digital empowerment significantly strengthens the relationship between exploitative innovation and digital servitization, but does not significantly moderate the exploratory innovation-digital servitization link. Digital servitization exerts significant positive effects on operational effectiveness and on customer participation in value co-creation, underscoring its significant role in translating innovation capabilities into both efficiency and relational gains. The study advances understanding of the microfoundations of digital servitization in manufacturing SMEs, nuances the role of digital empowerment as a contingent rather than universal amplifier of innovation ambidexterity. It provides actionable implications for SME leaders seeking to leverage digital tools, skills, and autonomy to turn innovation efforts into digitally enabled service offerings and improved performance.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.References
Abou-Foul, M., Ruiz-Alba, J. L., & Soares, A. (2020). The impact of digitalization and servitization on the financial performance of a firm: An empirical analysis. Production Planning & Control, 32(12), 975-989. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1780508
Allinson, C. W., & Hayes, J. (1996). The cognitive style index: A measure of intuition‐analysis for organizational research. Journal of Management Studies, 33(1), 119-135.
Almodóvar, P., & Nguyen, T. K. Q. (2022). Product innovation of domestic firms versus foreign MNE subsidiaries: The role of external knowledge sources. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 184, Article 122000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122000
Ardito, L., Besson, E., Petruzzelli, A. M., & Gregori, G. (2018). The influence of production, IT, and logistics process innovations on ambidexterity performance. Business Process Management Journal, 24(5), 1271-1284.
Becker, J.-M., Klein, K., & Wetzels, M. (2012). Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using reflective-formative type models. Long Range Planning, 45(5-6), 359-394.
Blome, C., Schoenherr, T., & Rexhausen, D. (2013). Antecedents and enablers of supply chain agility and its effect on performance: A cross‐functional and cross‐country study. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 18(6), 59-75.
Božič, K., & Dimovski, V. (2019). Business intelligence and analytics use, innovation ambidexterity, and firm performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(4), Article 101578.
Coreynen, W., Matthyssens, P., & Van Bockhaven, W. (2017). Boosting servitization through digitization: Pathways and dynamic resource configurations for manufacturers. Industrial Marketing Management, 60, 42-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.04.012
Coreynen, W., Matthyssens, P., Vanderstraeten, J., & Van Witteloostuijn, A. (2020). Unravelling the internal and external drivers of digital servitization: A dynamic capabilities and contingency perspective on firm strategy. Industrial Marketing Management, 89, 265-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.02.014
Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. M. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 269-277.
Favoretto, C., Mendes, G. H., Oliveira, M. G., Cauchick-Miguel, P. A., & Coreynen, W. (2022). From servitization to digital servitization: How digitalization transforms companies’ transition towards services. Industrial Marketing Management, 102, 104-121. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.01.003
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Gorla, N., Somers, T. M., & Wong, B. (2010). Organizational impact of system quality, information quality, and service quality. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 19(3), 207-228.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.
He, Z.-L., & Wong, P.-K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481-494. https://doi.org/10. 1287/orsc.1040.0078
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20, 277-319. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014
Herhausen, D. (2016). Unfolding the ambidextrous effects of proactive and responsive market orientation. Journal of Business Research, 69(7), 2585-2593. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.139
Huynh, L. D. T., Hoang, K., & Ongena, S. (2025). The impact of foreign sanctions on firm performance in Russia. The British Accounting Review, Article 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2025.101586
Huynh, N. T., Nguyen, V. P., Nguyen, N. Q., & Dinh, P. U. (2023). Technology innovation, technology complexity, and co-creation effects on organizational performance: The role of government influence and co-creation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(4), Article 100150.
Jansen, J. J. P., Tempelaar, M. P., van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: The mediating role of integration mechanisms. Organization Science, 20(4), 797-811. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0415
Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199-218.
Kieu, A. T., Nguyen, P. T. K., Vo, V. D., & Ly, P. S. (2025). Thúc đẩy số hóa và dịch vụ hóa trong các cửa hàng bán lẻ nhỏ, độc lập tại Việt Nam [Enhancing digitalization and servitization in Vietnamese small, independent retailers]. Tạp chí Khoa học Đại học Mở Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh - Kinh tế và Quản trị kinh doanh, 20(10), 54-70.
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1-10.
Kohtamäki, M., Parida, V., Oghazi, P., Gebauer, H., & Baines, T. (2019). Digital servitization business models in ecosystems: A theory of the firm. Journal of Business Research, 104, 380-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.027
Kohtamäki, M., Rabetino, R., Einola, S., Parida, V., & Patel, P. (2021). Unfolding the digital servitization path from products to product-service-software systems: Practicing change through intentional narratives. Journal of Business Research, 137, 379-392.
Lee, M.-J., Kim, Y., & Roh, T. (2024). Exploring the role of digital servitization for green innovation: Absorptive capacity, transformative capacity, and environmental strategy. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 207(1), Article 23614.
Li, F. (2025). The relationship between digital transformation and organisational efficiency in China: The mediating role of information disclosure. Sage Open, 15(3), Article 21582440251360487.
Li, Z., Li, H., & Wang, S. (2022). How multi-dimensional digital empowerment affects technology innovation performance: The moderating effect of adaptability to technology embedding. Sustainability, 14(23), Article 15916. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315916
Magnusson, J., Päivärinta, T., & Koutsikouri, D. (2020). Digital ambidexterity in the public sector: Empirical evidence of a bias in balancing practices. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 15(1), 59-79.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
Meng, T., Li, Q., He, C., & Dong, Z. (2025). Research on the configuration path of manufacturing enterprises’ digital servitization transformation. International Review of Economics & Finance, 98, Article 103952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.103952
Minaya, P. E., Avella, L., & Trespalacios, J. A. (2024). Synthesizing three decades of digital servitization: A systematic literature review and conceptual framework proposal. Service Business, 18(2), 193-222.
Momeni, K., Raddats, C., & Martinsuo, M. (2023). Mechanisms for developing operational capabilities in digital servitization. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 43(13), 101-127. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-04-2022-0259
Nakandala, D., Chen, J., & Chikweche, T. (2025). SME supply chain resilience in disruptive times: the effects of supply chain robustness, access to government assistance and disruption intensity. Business Process Management Journal, 31(2), 467-496.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002
Peña, M., Sánchez-López, J., & Díaz-Garrido, E. (2019). Servitization and digitalization in manufacturing: The influence on firm performance. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 35(3), 564-574. https://doi.org/10.1108/jbim-12-2018-0400
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891.
Qi, Y., Mao, Z., Zhang, M., & Guo, H. (2020). Manufacturing practices and servitization: The role of mass customization and product innovation capabilities. International Journal of Production Economics, 228, Article 107747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107747
Qiu, L., Duan, Y., Zhou, Y., Xu, F., Zheng, H., Cai, X., & Jiang, Z. (2024). Impact of digital empowerment on labor employment in manufacturing enterprises: Evidence from China. Heliyon, 10(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29040
Ranjan, K. R., & Read, S. (2016). Value co-creation: Concept and measurement. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(3), 290-315.
Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6
Wu, L., Rouyer, E., & Wang, C. (2022). Value co-creation or value co-destruction: Co-production and its double-sided effect. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 40(4), 842-864. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijbm-10-2021-0459
Yang, M., & Yi, X. (2021). Digital servitization and firm performance in manufacturing. Technovation, 104, Article 102254.
Yang, S., & Yang, Y. (2021). Effect of technological innovation inputs on global value chains status. Journal of Global Information Management, 29(5), 37-54. https://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.20210901.oa3
Yi, Y., & Gong, T. (2013). Customer value co-creation behavior: Scale development and validation. Journal of Business Research, 66(9), 1279-1284.
Zengin, M. A., & Yilmaz, M. K. (2025). Developing a scale for value co-creation in producer-supplier relationships. Future Business Journal, 11(1), Article 164.
Zhang, J. A., Edgar, F., Geare, A., & O’Kane, C. (2016). The interactive effects of entrepreneurial orientation and capability-based HRM on firm performance: The mediating role of innovation ambidexterity. Industrial Marketing Management, 59,
131-146. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.02.018
Zhao, Y., Chen, Y., Zhou, R., & Ci, Y. (2019). Factors influencing customers’ willingness to participate in virtual brand community’s value co-creation. Online Information Review, 43(3), 440-461. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-08-2017-0232
Zhu, W., Ouyang, P., & Kong, M. (2024). Research on the evolution mechanism of intelligent manufacturing transformation of Chinese pharmaceutical manufacturing enterprises based on system dynamics. Heliyon, 10(13). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33959
Downloads
Received: 11-12-2025Accepted: 25-02-2026Published: 12-03-2026Statistics Views
Abstract: 1080 PDF: 101How to Cite
Thông, N. N., & Kieu, T. A. (2026). From ambidextrous innovation to digital servitization: The moderating role of digital empowerment in Vietnamese Small and Medium-sized manufacturing Enterprises (SMEs). HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, 16(2), 135–155. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.en.16.2.5122.2026License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nguyen Ngoc Thong; Kieu Anh Tai

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Kieu Anh Tai
