Political uncertainty, climate risk, and ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) performance: International evidence

Authors

  • Le Anh Tuan
    University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
  • Dang Quan
    University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
  • Pham Anh Khoa
    University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
  • Duong Quang Hieu
    University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam

DOI:

10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.en.16.9.4705.2026

Keywords:

climate risk; corporate social responsibility; ESG performance; national culture; political risk

JEL Classification:

Q56; M14; Z13; P16

Abstract

This study examines whether country-level political risk influences corporate ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) performance. We further explore how cash reserves, national cultural dimensions, and climate change adaptation capabilities moderate this relationship. Utilizing panel data from Refinitiv and the International Country Risk Guide (ICRG) across 31 countries between 2002 and 2018, and employing fixed-effects regression, we document three key findings: First, heightened political risk significantly reduces firms’ ESG performance. The findings are robust to GMM estimation and instrumental variable techniques that address endogeneity. Second, this adverse effect is mitigated in firms with lower cash reserves and in countries with more advanced climate adaptation strategies. Third, national culture exhibits heterogeneous moderating effects. Our study extends the ESG literature by introducing political risk, measured using ICRG’s comprehensive framework, as a novel determinant in cross-national contexts, offering actionable insights for policymakers and corporate stakeholders operating in politically volatile environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguilera, R. V., Aragón-Correa, J. A., Marano, V., & Tashman, P. A. (2021). The corporate governance of environmental sustainability: A review and proposal for more integrated research. Journal of Management, 47(6), 1468-1497.

Ahmad, H., Yaqub, M., & Lee, S. H. (2023). Environmental-, social-, and governance-related factors for business investment and sustainability: A scientometric review of global trends. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(2), 2965-2987.

Andriosopoulos, D., & Deepty, S. T. (2019). Can social capital and reputation mitigate political and industry-wide economic risk? SSRN Electronic Journal. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3316174

Afzali, M., Silvola, H., & Terjesen, S. (2022). Social capital and board gender diversity. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 30(4), 461-481.

Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29-51.

Downloads

Received: 18-08-2025
Accepted: 07-10-2025
Published: 19-10-2025

Statistics Views

Abstract: 293
PDF: 117

How to Cite

Le, A. T., Dang, Q., Pham, A. K., & Duong, Q. H. (2025). Political uncertainty, climate risk, and ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) performance: International evidence. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Economics and Business Administration, 16(9). https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.en.16.9.4705.2026

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.