The Franklin effect in social and workplace contexts: A qualitative study on how small requests foster interpersonal bonding
Authors
-
Nguyen Quang Anh
Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnamhttps://orcid.org/0009-0002-1648-783X
- Nguyen Hoang Phuc phucnguyen.31221023675@st.ueh.edu.vn
University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnamhttps://orcid.org/0009-0006-3985-3141DOI:
10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.en.16.8.4696.2026Keywords:
bonding; Franklin effect; small requests; trust; workplace relationshipsJEL Classification:
M12; Z13; D91Abstract
This study explores the Franklin effect, the phenomenon in which granting small requests fosters liking and bonding in personal and workplace relationships. Drawing on cognitive dissonance and self-perception theory, the research adopts a qualitative, exploratory design using semi-structured interviews with 30 participants (15 from personal contexts and 15 from workplace contexts), recruited through professional networks, social media, and snowball sampling. Through thematic analysis, four core themes emerged: (1) psychological proximity - small requests reduce social distance and increase comfort in interactions; (2) reciprocity-driven trust - the act of granting favors enhances perceptions of trust and mutual respect; (3) workplace micro-bonding - minor requests strengthen collaboration and team cohesion; and (4) cultural framing - collectivist and individualist contexts moderate how the Franklin Effect manifests. These findings extend existing theory by revealing how small interpersonal exchanges function as low-cost, high-impact relational mechanisms. The study offers practical implications for managers and individuals seeking to leverage subtle, non-coercive strategies to build stronger social and professional ties.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.References
Arnold, O., & Kaiser, F.G. (2018). Understanding the foot‐in‐the‐door effect as a pseudo‐effect from the perspective of the Campbell paradigm. International Journal of Psychology, 53(2), 157-165. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12289
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 1-62). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60024-6
Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475
Bicchieri, C., & Dimant, E. (2022). Nudging with care: The risks and benefits of social information. Public Choice, 191(3), 443-464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-019-00684-6
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Burger, J. M. (1999). The foot-in-the-door compliance procedure: A multiple-process analysis and review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(4), 303-325. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0304_2
Burke, M., Kraut, R., & Joyce, E. (2009). Membership claims and requests: Conversation-level newcomer socialization strategies in online groups. Small Group Research, 41(1), 4-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496409351936
Campagna, R. L., Mislin, A. A., Dirks, K. T., & Elfenbein, H. A. (2021). The (mostly) robust influence of initial trustworthiness beliefs on subsequent behaviors and perceptions. Human Relations, 75(7), 1383-1411. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267211002905
Chancellor, J., Margolis, S., Bao, K. J., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2018). Everyday prosociality in the workplace: The reinforcing benefits of giving, getting and glimpsing. Emotion, 18(4), 507-517. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000321
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
El-Alayli, A., & Messé, L. A. (2004). Reactions toward an unexpected or counternormative favor-giver: Does it matter if we think we can reciprocate? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(5), 633-641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.01.003
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
Floyd, K., & Ray, C. D. (2017). Thanks, but no thanks: Negotiating face threats when rejecting offers of unwanted social support. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34(8), 1260-1276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407516673161
Flynn, F. J. (2003). How much should I give and how often? The effects of generosity and frequency of favor exchange on social status and productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 539-553. https://doi.org/10.5465/30040648
Freedman, J. L., & Fraser, S. C. (1966). Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(2), 195-202. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023552
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books.
Goei, R., Lindsey, L. L. M., Boster, F. J., Skalski, P. D., & Bowman, J. M. (2003). The mediating roles of liking and obligation on the relationship between favors and compliance. Communication Research, 30(2), 178-197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650202250877
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field methods, 18(1), 59-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Hinojosa, A. S., Gardner, W. L., Walker, H. J., Cogliser, C., & Gullifor, D. (2017). A review of cognitive dissonance theory in management research: Opportunities for further development. Journal of Management, 43(1), 170-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316668236
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage Publications.
Jecker, J., & Landy, D. (1969). Liking a person as a function of doing him a favor. Human Relations, 22(4), 371-378. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872676902200407
Jolly, P. M., Kong, D. T., & Kim, K. Y. (2021). Social support at work: An integrative review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(2), 229-251. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2485
Kaiser, F. G., Byrka, K., & Hartig, T. (2010). Reviving Campbell’s paradigm for attitude research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(4), 351-367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310366452
Klyver, K., Honig, B., & Steffens, P. (2018). Social support timing and persistence in nascent entrepreneurship: Exploring when instrumental and emotional support is most effective. Small Business Economics, 51(3), 709-734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9964-5
Kramer, R., Tyler, T., Lewicki, R., & Bunker, B. (1996). Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. In Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships (pp. 114-139). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243610.n7
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Sage.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Liu, X., Zhang, J., Shang, H., Guo, S., Yang, C., & Zhu, Q. (2024). Exploring prosocial irrationality for llm agents: A social cognition view. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.14744
Mantell, M. (2025). The Benjamin Franklin effect: How to be likable (instantly!). Science of People. https://www.scienceofpeople.com/benjamin-franklin-effect/
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
Methot, J. R., Lepine, J. A., Podsakoff, N. P., & Christian, J. S. (2016). Are workplace friendships a mixed blessing? Exploring tradeoffs of multiplex relationships and their associations with job performance. Personnel Psychology, 69(2), 311-355. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12109
Methot, J. R., Melwani, S., & Rothman, N. B. (2017). The space between us: A social-functional emotions view of ambivalent and indifferent workplace relationships. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1789-1819. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316685853
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.
Mohebi, L., & Bailey, F. (2020). Exploring Bem’s self perception theory in educational context. Encyclopaideia, 24(58), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1825-8670/9891
Molm, L. D., Takahashi, N., & Peterson, G. (2000). Risk and trust in social exchange: An experimental test of a classical proposition. American Journal of Sociology, 105(5), 1396-1427. https://doi.org/10.1086/210434
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533225
Niiya, Y. (2016). Does a favor request increase liking toward the requester? The Journal of Social Psychology, 156(2), 211-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2015.1095706
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Orb, A., Eisenhauer, L., & Wynaden, D. (2001). Ethics in qualitative research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(1), 93-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00093.x
Parkes, L., Bochner, S., & Schneider, S. (2001). Person-organisation fit across cultures: An empirical investigation of individualism and collectivism. Applied Psychology, 50(1), 81-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00049
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage Publications.
Reisinger, Y., & Turner, L. (2012). Cross-cultural behaviour in tourism. Routledge.
Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Westview Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429499845
Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 54(2), 323-338. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.2.323
Vekaria, K. M., O’Connell, K., Rhoads, S. A., Brethel-Haurwitz, K. M., Cardinale, E. M., Robertson, E. L., Walitt, B., VanMeter, J. W., & Marsh, A. A. (2020). Activation in Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis (BNST) corresponds to everyday helping. Cortex, 127, 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.02.001
Visser, C. (2024). The Benjamin Franklin effect: The psychology of favors. Progress Focused. https://www.progressfocused.com/2024/02/the-benjamin-franklin-effect-psychology.html
Yamagishi, T., Jin, N., & Miller, A. S. (1998). In‐group bias and culture of collectivism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1(3), 315-328. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00020
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (Vol. 6). Sage.
Yuki, M., Maddux, W. W., Brewer, M. B., & Takemura, K. (2005). Cross-cultural differences in relationship-and group-based trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(1), 48-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271305
Zolfaghari, B., & Madjdi, F. (2022). Building trusting multicultural organizations: Rethinking the influence of culture on interpersonal trust development in the workplace. Journal of International Management, 28(4), Article 100944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2022.100944
Downloads
Received: 12-08-2025Accepted: 07-10-2025Published: 19-10-2025Statistics
Abstract: 921 PDF: 334
FWCI: ---How to Cite
Nguyen, Q. A., & Nguyen, H. P. (2025). The Franklin effect in social and workplace contexts: A qualitative study on how small requests foster interpersonal bonding. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Economics and Business Administration, 16(8). https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.en.16.8.4696.2026License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nguyen Quang Anh; Nguyen Hoang Phuc

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Similar Articles
- Tam Luong Huynh, Ha Minh Nguyen, Transactional leadership and workplace bullying among employees in Vietnam , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Economics and Business Administration: 14(2)2024
- Tran Quoc Dai, Dang Thi Phuong Nga, Brand authenticity and brand defense: Mediating roles of trust and co-creation in Vietnam’s state-owned retail banking , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Economics and Business Administration: 17(2)2027 (ONLINE FIRST)
- Ho Trong Nghia, Bui Thi Thanh, Diep Quoc Bao, The relationship between satisfaction, trust and repurchase intention: examining the moderating role of word of mouth , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Economics and Business Administration: 7 (2) 2017
- Le Vo Lieu Hoang, Ho Nhut Quang, The effects of emotional intelligence and word-of-mouth on consumers’ purchase decision in social network online purchase toward cosmetic market – A study in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Economics and Business Administration: 7 (2) 2017
- Nguyen Ngoc Dan Thanh, Nguyen Thuy Binh, The relationship between online trust, customer engagement and EWOM , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Economics and Business Administration: 9 (1) 2019
- Tran Thuy, Do Khac Trung, Trust, ties, and transactions: The impact of social capital on card payments , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Economics and Business Administration: 16(9)2026 (ONLINE FIRST)
- Phuong Hoang Lam, Thanh Thi Bui, Mai Thi Tuyet Vo, Lan Thi Ngoc Tran, Determinants of electronic word of mouth in the restaurant industry: An evidence from Vietnam , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Economics and Business Administration: 14(2)2024
- Khanh Thi Ngoc Nguyen, Ngoc Thi Nhu Truong, Exploring digital marketing strategies in small-sized enterprises in Vietnam , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Economics and Business Administration: 14(4)2024
- Le Dinh Minh Tri, Vo Bao Loc, Factors influencing the trust of young customers while using e-commerce websites , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Economics and Business Administration: 3(1)2013
- Nguyen Ngoc Bich Tram, Du Thi Chung, The influence of negative marketing practices on brand hate: The moderating effect of negative word of mouth in the organic food industry , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Economics and Business Administration: 17(2)2027 (ONLINE FIRST)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
- Nguyen Hoang Phuc phucnguyen.31221023675@st.ueh.edu.vn
