Limiting greenhouse gas emissions in the organization for economic co-operation and development countries: The role of green innovation and national governance
Authors
-
Trinh Hoang Hong Hue
huethh@uel.edu.vn
University of Economics and Law, Ho Chi Minh City
Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Namhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3725-1773- Do Nguyen Khanh Van
University of Economics and Law, Ho Chi Minh City
Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Namhttps://orcid.org/0009-0000-7851-3330DOI:
10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.en.16.5.4373.2026Keywords:
decision tree regression; greenhouse gas emissions; green innovation; national governance; PCA; panel dataJEL Classification:
O44; O43; Q55; Q56Abstract
Governance and green innovation are essential factors in reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, a key objective in achieving sustainable development. This study aims to examine the effects of national governance and green innovation on GHG emissions in 38 OECD countries during the period 2002 - 2021, in the context of increasing environmental challenges. The study employs multiple panel data regression techniques, including the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression model, the Fixed Effects Model (FEM), the Random Effects Model (REM), and the Feasible Generalized Least Squares (FGLS) model. Additionally, the authors conduct the Pesaran CD test to assess cross-country interdependence in pollution levels. To evaluate national governance, the study applies Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to synthesize six governance indicators: voice and accountability, political stability and absence of violence /terrorism, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, rule of law, and control of corruption. The REM results indicate that green innovation has a statistically significant and positive impact on reducing GHG emissions. Furthermore, the Decision Tree Regression identifies trade openness, urbanization, and green innovation as the most influential factors in reducing emissions, while national governance appears to exert the least influence.
These findings suggest that although governance plays a supporting role, technological advancement and economic integration are more decisive in shaping environmental outcomes. This study contributes to the literature by integrating advanced regression techniques and multi-dimensional governance indicators, thereby offering empirical evidence to support the formulation of effective policy frameworks that promote green innovation, enhance environmental quality, and foster sustainable development.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.References
Ahmed, Z., Cary, M., Ali, S., Murshed, M., Ullah, H., & Mahmood, H. (2022). Moving toward a green revolution in Japan: Symmetric and asymmetric relationships among clean energy technology development investments, economic growth, and CO2 emissions. Energy & Environment, 33(7), 1417-1440.
Alsaleh, M., & Abdul-Rahim, A. S. (2022). An evaluation of bioenergy industry sustainability impacts on forest degradation: Evidence from European Union economies. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(2), 1738-1760.
Andrews-Speed, P. (2016). Applying institutional theory to the low-carbon energy transition. Energy Research & Social Science, 13, 216-225.
Ansell, C., Boin, A., & Kuipers, S. (2016). Chapter 22: Institutional crisis and the policy agenda. In Handbook of public policy agenda setting (pp. 415-432). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Aziz, G., & Sarwar, S. (2023). Revisit the role of governance indicators to achieve sustainable economic growth of Saudi Arabia-Pre and post implementation of 2030 Vision. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 66(C), 213-227.
Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Shahbaz, M., Roubaud, D., & Farhani, S. (2018). How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO₂ emissions? Energy Policy, 113(C), 356-367.
Boyce, S., & He, F. (2022). Political governance, socioeconomics, and weather influence provincial GHG emissions in Canada. Energy Policy, 168(C), Article 113019.
Clifton, J., & Díaz-Fuentes, D. (2014). The OECD and “the rest”: Analyzing the limits of policy transfer. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 16(3), 249-265.
Danish, K., & Ulucak, R. (2020). The pathway toward pollution mitigation: Does institutional quality make a difference? Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3571-3583.
Dash, A. K., Panda, S. P., Sahu, P. K., & Jóźwik, B. (2024). Do green innovation and governance limit CO₂ emissions: Evidence from twelve polluting countries with panel data decision tree model. Discover Sustainability, 5(1), Article 198.
Dixit, P., & Gehlot, K. (2024). Combining decision tree and Bayesian networks for improved predictive analytics. Hybrid Information Systems: Non-Linear Optimization Strategies with Artificial Intelligence, 91, 91-114.
Dogan, E., & Seker, F. (2016). Determinants of CO₂ emissions in the European Union: The role of renewable and non-renewable energy. Renewable Energy, 94(C), 429-439.
Ebrahimi, S. M., & Koh, L. (2021). Manufacturing sustainability: Institutional theory and life cycle thinking. Journal of Cleaner Production, 298, Article 126787.
Eid, A. G., Mrabet, Z., & Alsamara, M. (2024). Assessing the impact of energy R&D on green growth in OECD countries: A CS-ARDL analysis. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 26(4), 1-40.
Faundez, J. (2016). Douglass North’s theory of institutions: Lessons for law and development. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 8(2), 373-419.
Fearnside, P. M. (2002). Greenhouse gas emissions from a hydroelectric reservoir (Brazil’s Tucuruí Dam) and the energy policy implications. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 133(1/4), 69-96.
Fekete, H., Kuramochi, T., Roelfsema, M., den Elzen, M., Forsell, N., Höhne, N., Luna, L., Hans, F., Sterl, S., Olivier, J., van, Heleen., Frank, S. & Gusti, M. (2021). A review of successful climate change mitigation policies in major emitting economies and the potential of global replication. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 137(C), Article 110602.
Fernández, Y. F., López, M. F., & Blanco, B. O. (2018). Innovation for sustainability: The impact of R&D spending on CO2 emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3459-3467.
Gewers, F. L., Ferreira, G. R., Arruda, H. F. D., Silva, F. N., Comin, C. H., Amancio, D. R., & Costa, L. D. F. (2021). Principal component analysis: A natural approach to data exploration. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 54(4), 1-34.
Goud, N. N. (2022). Corporate governance: Does it matter management of carbon emission performance? An empirical analyses of Indian companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 379, Article 134485.
Greenacre, M., Groenen, P. J., Hastie, T., d’Enza, A. I., Markos, A., & Tuzhilina, E. (2022). Principal component analysis. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 2(1), Article 100.
Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251-1271.
Huang, J. W., & Li, Y. H. (2017). Green innovation and performance: The view of organizational capability and social reciprocity. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(2), 309-324.
Huang, Y. F., Azevedo, S. G., Lin, T. J., Cheng, C. S., & Lin, C. T. (2021). Exploring the decisive barriers to achieve circular economy: Strategies for the textile innovation in Taiwan. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1406-1423.
Huynh, C. M., & Hoang, H. H. (2024). Climate change and income inequality in Asia: How does institutional quality matter? Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 30(3), 737-761.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2023). AR6 synthesis report climate change 2023. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/
Jepperson, R. L., & Meyer, J. W. (2021). Institutional theory: The cultural construction of organizations, states, and identities. Cambridge University Press.
Kahouli, B. (2018). The causality link between energy electricity consumption, CO₂ emissions, R&D stocks and economic growth in Mediterranean countries. Energy, 145(C), 388-399.
Koçak, E., & Ulucak, Z. Ş. (2019). The effect of energy R&D expenditures on CO₂ emission reduction: Estimation of the STIRPAT model for OECD countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(14), 14328-14338.
Lin, B., & Okoye, J. O. (2023). Towards renewable energy generation and low greenhouse gas emission in high-income countries: Performance of financial development and governance. Renewable Energy, 215(C), Article 118931.
Liu, Y., Gao, C., & Lu, Y. (2017). The impact of urbanization on GHG emissions in China: The role of population density. Journal of Cleaner Production, 157, 299-309.
Long, H., & Feng, G. (2024). Does national ESG performance curb greenhouse gas emissions? Innovation and Green Development, 3(3), Article 100138.
Lu, W. C. (2017). Greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: A panel cointegration analysis for 16 Asian countries. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(11), Article 1436.
Ma, W., Zhang, R., & Chai, S. (2019). What drives green innovation? A game theoretic analysis of government subsidy and cooperation contract. Sustainability, 11(20), Article 5584.
Miśkiewicz, R. (2021). The impact of innovation and information technology on greenhouse gas emissions: A case of the Visegrád countries. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(2), Article 59.
Muscat, A., De Olde, E. M., Kovacic, Z., De Boer, I. J. M., & Ripoll-Bosch, R. (2021). Food, energy or biomaterials? Policy coherence across agro-food and bioeconomy policy domains in the EU. Environmental Science & Policy, 123, 21-30.
Oduro, S., Maccario, G., & De Nisco, A. (2022). Green innovation: A multidomain systematic review. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(2), 567-591.
Our World in Data. (2024). Annual greenhouse gas emissions including land use. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/total-ghg-emissions
Oyewo, B., Tawiah, V., & Alta’any, M. (2024). Determinants and impact of strategy-driven manufacturing accounting techniques on organisational competitiveness: A structural equation modelling approach. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 21(1), 114-142.
Park, Y., Meng, F., & Baloch, M. A. (2018). The effect of ICT, financial development, growth, and trade openness on CO₂ emissions: An empirical analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(30), 30708-30719.
Puertas, R., & Marti, L. (2021). Eco-innovation and determinants of GHG emissions in OECD countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 319, Article 128739.
Qi, X., Li, Z., Zhao, C., Li, J., & Zhang, Q. (2024). International governance of Arctic shipping black carbon emissions: Current situation and impediments to progress. Marine Policy, 161, Article 106043.
Rocha, M., & Falduto, C. (2019). Key questions guiding the process of setting up long-term low-emissions development strategies (No. 2019/04). OECD Publishing.
Sarpong, S. Y., & Bein, M. A. (2020). The relationship between good governance and CO₂ emissions in oil- and non-oil-producing countries: A dynamic panel study of sub-Saharan Africa. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(17), 21986-22003.
Sharif, A., Kocak, S., Khan, H. H. A., Uzuner, G., & Tiwari, S. (2023). Demystifying the links between green technology innovation, economic growth, and environmental tax in ASEAN-6 countries: The dynamic role of green energy and green investment. Gondwana Research, 115, 98-106.
Spaargaren, G., Mol, A. P., & Sonnenfeld, D. A. (2020). Ecological modernisation: Assessment, critical debates and future directions. In The ecological modernisation reader (pp. 501-520). Routledge.
Sun, X., Dong, Y., Wang, Y., & Ren, J. (2022). Sources of greenhouse gas emission reductions in OECD countries: Composition or technique effects. Ecological Economics, 193, Article 107288.
Tang, W., Mai, L., & Li, M. (2023). Green innovation and resource efficiency to meet net-zero emission. Resources Policy, 86(PB), Article 104231.
Tsang, S., & Kolk, A. (2010). The evolution of Chinese policies and governance structures on environment, energy and climate. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20(3), 180-196.
Vuong, Q. H., Nguyen, M. H., & La, V. P. (2023). The uncertain future of global climate change commitments. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10408796
Wan, B., Wan, W., Hanif, N., & Ahmed, Z. (2022). Logistics performance and environmental sustainability: Do green innovation, renewable energy, and economic globalization matter? Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, Article 996341.
Wang, F., Harindintwali, J. D., Wei, K., Shan, Y., Mi, Z., Costello, M. J., Grunwald, S., Feng, Z., Wang, F., Guo, Y., Wu, X., Kumar, P., Kästner, M., Feng, X., Kang, S., Liu, Z., Fu, Y., Zhao, W., Ouyang, ... Zhu, Y. (2023). Climate change: Strategies for mitigation and adaptation. The Innovation Geoscience, 1(1), Article 100015.
Wang, H., Wang, W., Liang, S., Zhang, C., Qu, S., Liang, Y., Li, Y., Xu, M., & Yang, Z. (2019). Determinants of greenhouse gas emissions from interconnected grids in China. Environmental Science & Technology, 53(3), 1432-1440.
World Bank. (2024a). Research and development expenditure (% of GDP). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS
World Bank. (2024b). Worldwide Governance Indicators. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/worldwide-governance-indicators
World Bank. (2024c). Foreign direct investment, net inflows (% of GDP). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BX.KLT.DINV.WD.GD.ZS
World Bank. (2024d). Trade (% of GDP). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.TRD.GNFS.ZS
World Bank. (2024e). Urban population (% of total population). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.URB.TOTL.IN.ZS
World Meteorological Organization. (2024). Greenhouse gas concentrations surge again to new record in 2023. https://wmo.int/news/media-centre/greenhouse-gas-concentrations-surge-again-new-record-2023
Xu, L., Fan, M., Yang, L., & Shao, S. (2021). Heterogeneous green innovations and carbon emission performance: Evidence at China’s city level. Energy Economics, 99(C), Article105269.
Yan, H., Qamruzzaman, M., & Kor, S. (2023). Nexus between green investment, fiscal policy, environmental tax, energy price, natural resources, and clean energy - A step towards sustainable development by fostering clean energy inclusion. Sustainability, 15(18), Article 13591.
Yusuf, A. M., Abubakar, A. B., & Mamman, S. O. (2020). Relationship between greenhouse gas emission, energy consumption, and economic growth: Evidence from some selected oil-producing African countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(13), 15815-15823.
Zhang, H., Liang, Q., Peng, Z., Zhao, Y., Tan, Y., Zhang, X., & Bol, R. (2023). Response of greenhouse gases emissions and yields to irrigation and straw practices in wheat-maize cropping system. Agricultural Water Management, 282(C), Article 108281.
Zhang, N., Wang, L., Wang, X., Liu, Z., Huang, S., Wang, Z., Chen, C., Qian, H., Li, G., Liu, Z., Ding, Y., Zhang, W., & Jiang, Y. (2024). Effects of warming on greenhouse gas emissions from China’s rice paddies. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 366, Article 108953.
Zhang, S., Xie, W., Sun, S., Wu, F., & Xue, Y. (2024). Nexus of green energy innovation, governance quality, and CO2 emissions in natural resource sector: The role of sustainable human development. Resources Policy, 88(C), Article 104493.
Zhang, Y., & Dilanchiev, A. (2022). Economic recovery, industrial structure and natural resource utilization efficiency in China: Effect on green economic recovery. Resources Policy, 79(C), Article 102958.
Downloads
Received: 08-05-2025Accepted: 27-08-2025Published: 07-09-2025Statistics Views
Abstract: 1419 PDF: 72How to Cite
Trinh, H. H. H., & Do, N. K. V. (2025). Limiting greenhouse gas emissions in the organization for economic co-operation and development countries: The role of green innovation and national governance. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Economics and Business Administration, 16(5), 125–147. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.en.16.5.4373.2026License
Copyright (c) 2026 Trinh Hoang Hong Hue; Do Nguyen Khanh Van

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Similar Articles
- Oanh Thi Thuy Thai, Tho Alang, Greenwash and green purchase intentions among Vietnamese consumers: The mediating roles of green skepticism, environmental concern and knowledge , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Economics and Business Administration: 15(4)2025
- Doan Gia Bao Ngoc, Luu Minh Quan, Truong Thi Thanh Ha, Nguyen Duc Minh Tan, Phan Thi Minh Huyen, Tran Duy Thanh, Building a new hybrid machine learning model for improvement insurance cross-sell prediction , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Economics and Business Administration: 16(1)2026
- Trinh Cong Tam, Ha Minh Tri, Le Dinh Minh Tri, Nguyen Tran Anh Thu, Covid-19 pandemic, fear index, national culture, and demand for gold: An international analysis , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Economics and Business Administration: 16(3)2026
- Duong Cong Hiep, Green transformational leadership and its prediction of sustainable performance: The mediating role of green innovation , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Economics and Business Administration: 17(2)2027 (ONLINE FIRST)
- Oanh Thi Hoang Truong, Tien Trung Nguyen, Truc Thanh Vo, A bibliometric review of service innovation: Constituting research themes , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Economics and Business Administration: 14(3)2024
- Leomarich Fortugaliza Casinillo, Karen Luz Pacetes Yap, On the predictors of governance and administration of the vegetable farmers’ association: A regression analysis , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Economics and Business Administration: 16(9)2026 (ONLINE FIRST)
- Khai The Nguyen, Phuong Ngoc Duy Nguyen, Cuong Quoc Tran, Truc Thi Thanh Do, Green human resource management and employee pro-environmental behaviors: The role of individual green value , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Economics and Business Administration: 14(2)2024
- Pham Thi Thu Hien, Doan Bao Son, Nguyen Huy Phuc, Nguyen Ngoc Kieu Anh, Nguyen Dinh Loc, Tong Tinh Nghi, Green purchase behavior of students in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: The integration of protection motivation theory and theory of green purchase behavior , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Economics and Business Administration: 16(4)2026
- Thu Thi Hong Nguyen, Minh Hue Nguyen, Bich Ngoc Do, Minh Thi Hong Le, The impact of access to finance and business environment on firm innovation in Vietnam: Moderating role of working experience of top manager , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Economics and Business Administration: 14(4)2024
- Minh Hue Nguyen, Hang Thu Hoang, Dung Van Nguyen, Canh Huynh Quang Trinh, Supply chain innovation and financial performance in ASEAN manufacturing firms: The moderating role of organisational innovation , Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Economics and Business Administration: 15(1)2025
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
- Do Nguyen Khanh Van
