Quiet quitting in the era of hybrid work: A qualitative study on work motivation among generation Z
Authors
-
Nguyen Quang Anh
Song Hanh Institute for Business Administration, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Namhttps://orcid.org/0009-0002-1648-783X
- Nguyen Hoang Phuc phucnguyen.31221023675@st.ueh.edu.vn
University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Namhttps://orcid.org/0009-0006-3985-3141- Huynh Trong Hien
Song Hanh Institute for Business Administration, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Namhttps://orcid.org/0009-0008-3059-5064- Luong Bich An
University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Namhttps://orcid.org/0009-0001-1039-3472- Nguyen Thi Huong Giang
University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Namhttps://orcid.org/0009-0000-8596-819X- Luong Thi My Duyen
University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Namhttps://orcid.org/0009-0006-3099-1732DOI:
10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.en.16.4.4262.2026Keywords:
extrinsic motivation; gen Z employees; hybrid workplace; intrinsic motivation; quiet quittingJEL Classification:
D23; M12; M14Abstract
With the growing prevalence of hybrid work, the phenomenon of quiet quitting has emerged as a critical challenge, particularly among Generation Z employees who seek purpose, autonomy, and work-life balance. This qualitative study aims to explore the motivational experiences of Gen Z employees in hybrid work environments and how these experiences relate to quiet quitting. Self-Determination Theory serves as a conceptual lens through which patterns emerge from the data. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with 33 Gen Z employees and 05 managers working in hybrid roles across various industries in Vietnam. Thematic analysis was employed to identify patterns related to intrinsic and extrinsic motivation and their connection to the quiet quitting phenomenon. This study uncovers key findings: (1) intrinsic motivation is weakened by social isolation and limited career growth, (2) extrinsic rewards alone are insufficient to sustain long-term engagement, and (3) leadership strategies play a pivotal role in mitigating disengagement. The study provides actionable recommendations for organizations, emphasizing the need for structured career development, enhanced recognition programs, and leadership approaches tailored to the expectations of Gen Z employees. These insights contribute to the evolving discourse on workplace motivation, offering a foundation for future research on employee engagement strategies in hybrid and remote work settings.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.References
Abdullah, A., & Bangcola, A. (2024). Investigating the perspectives of millennial and Gen Z nurses on quiet quitting in Marawi City, Lanao del Sur, Philippines. The Malaysian Journal of Nursing (MJN), 16(1), 135-148.
Adami, M. F., & Kiger, A. (2005). The use of triangulation for completeness purposes. Nurse Researcher, 12(4), 19-29.
Adil, A., Kausar, S., Ameer, S., Ghayas, S., & Shujja, S. (2023). Impact of organizational socialization on organizational citizenship behavior: Mediating role of knowledge sharing and role clarity. Current Psychology, 42(7), 5685-5693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01899-x
Aydin, E., & Azizoğlu, Ö. (2022). A new term for an existing concept: Quiet quitting - A self determination perspective. In International congress on critical debates in social sciences (pp. 285-295).
Bansal, S., & Garg, N. (2024). Quitting silently: A longitudinal research on the impact of workplace conflict and nonviolent work behavior. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 42(2), 241-258. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21444
Battaglio, R. P., Belle, N., & Cantarelli, P. (2022). Self-determination theory goes public: Experimental evidence on the causal relationship between psychological needs and job satisfaction. Public Management Review, 24(9), 1411-1428. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1900351
Baumann, O., & Sander, E. L. J. (2021). Psychological impacts of remote working under social distancing restrictions. In Handbook of research on remote work and worker well-being in the post-Covid-19 era (pp. 1-17). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-6754-8.ch001
Bhadoriya, S., & Chauhan, S. S. (2013). A critical analysis on intrinsic & extrinsic factors of motivation. International Journal of Management and Business Studies, 3(3), 20-26.
Boyce, C., & Neale, P. (2006). Conducting in-depth interviews: A guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input (vol. 2). Pathfinder International.
Boyraz, M., & Gilbert, R. (2024). Is the future of work hybrid? Examining motivations and expectations related to working from home in knowledge workers’ lived experiences. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 46(5), 1086-1111. https://doi.org/10.1108/er-09-2023-0478
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Burt, C. D., & Burt, C. D. (2015). The initial employment period: Behaviors, familiarity, adaptation and trust development. In New employee safety: Risk factors and management strategies (pp. 91-107). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18684-9_7
Chan, X. W., Shang, S., Brough, P., Wilkinson, A., & Lu, C. Q. (2023). Work, life and Covid‐19: A rapid review and practical recommendations for the post‐pandemic workplace. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 61(2), 257-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12355
Coleman, M. L., Ragan, M., & Dari, T. (2024). Intercoder reliability for use in qualitative research and evaluation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 57(2), 136-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2024.2303715
Cook, J., Mor, Y., & Santos, P. (2020). Three cases of hybridity in learning spaces: Towards a design for a Zone of Possibility. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1155-1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12945
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 19-43.
Dillard, N., Cavallo, T., & Zhang, P. (2024). A return to humanism: A multi-level analysis exploring the positive effects of quiet quitting. Human Resource Development Review, 24(2), Article 15344843241305655. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843241305655
Doshi, N., & McGregor, L. (2015). Primed to perform. Harper Collins.
Dworkin, S. L. (2012). Sample size policy for qualitative studies using in-depth interviews. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(6), 1319-1320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-0016-6
Eppich, W. J., Gormley, G., & Teunissen, P. W. (2019). In-depth interviews. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26837-4_12
Fana, M., Massimo, F. S., & Moro, A. (2021). Autonomy and control in mass remote working during the Covid-19 pandemic: Evidence from a cross-professional and cross-national analysis (No. 2021/28, LEM Working Paper Series). https://hdl.handle.net/10419/247297
Fang, M., Gerhart, B., & Ledford, G. E. (2013). Negative effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation: More smoke than fire. World at Work Quarterly, 16(2), 17-29.
Freitas, H., Oliveira, M., Jenkins, M., & Popjoy, O. (1998). The focus group, a qualitative research method. Journal of Education, 1(1), 1-22.
Gabelaia, I., & Bagočiūnaitė, R. (2024). The impact of “quiet quitting” on overall organizational behavior and culture. In International conference on reliability and statistics in transportation and communication (pp. 366-378). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53598-7_33
Gagné, M., Parker, S. K., Griffin, M. A., Dunlop, P. D., Knight, C., Klonek, F. E., & Parent-Rocheleau, X. (2022). Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(7), 378-392. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00056-w
Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), Article 1524.
Galanis, P., Katsiroumpa, A., Vraka, I., Siskou, O., Konstantakopoulou, O., Moisoglou, I., Gallos, P., & Kaitelidou, D. (2023). The quiet quitting scale: Development and initial validation. AIMS Public Health, 10(4), 828-848. https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2023055
Gandini, A., & Leonini, L. (2019). The myth of flexibility: Young adults’ expectations of work in the digital economy in milan. In Youth and the politics of the present (pp. 101-112). Routledge.
Garavan, T. N., McGuire, D., & O’Donnell, D. (2004). Exploring human resource development: A levels of analysis approach. Human Resource Development Review, 3(4), 417-441. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484304271669
Gilson, L. L., Lim, H. S., Luciano, M. M., & Choi, J. N. (2013). Unpacking the cross‐level effects of tenure diversity, explicit knowledge, and knowledge sharing on individual creativity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86(2), 203-222.
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Guest, G., Namey, E., Taylor, J., Eley, N., & McKenna, K. (2017). Comparing focus groups and individual interviews: Findings from a randomized study. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(6), 693-708. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2017.1281601
Halcomb, E. J., & Andrew, S. (2005). Triangulation as a method for contemporary nursing research. Nurse Researcher, 13(2), 71-82.
Hansen, K., & Świderska, A. (2024). Integrating open-and closed-ended questions on attitudes towards outgroups with different methods of text analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 56(5), 4802-4822. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02218-x
Hanzis, A., & Hallo, L. (2024). The experiences and views of employees on hybrid ways of working. Administrative Sciences, 14(10), Article 263. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14100263
Herlambang, M. B., Cnossen, F., & Taatgen, N. A. (2021). The effects of intrinsic motivation on mental fatigue. PloS One, 16(1), e0243754. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243754
Hofschulte-Beck, A. (2022). The long-term impacts of remote working on employees and employers [Doctoral dissertation]. The College of St. Scholastica.
Jufrizen, J., & Sitorus, T. S. (2021). Pengaruh motivasi kerja dan kepuasan kerja terhadap kinerja dengan disiplin kerja sebagai variabel intervening. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Edukasi Sosial Dan Humaniora, 1(1), 844-859. https://doi.org/10.53695/sintesa.v1i1.419
Ke, W., & Zhang, P. (2010). The effects of extrinsic motivations and satisfaction in open source software development. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11(12), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00251
Kilpatrick, A. (2022). A look at “quiet quitting” - and whether it’s a good or bad thing. National Public Radio. https://www.npr.org/2022/08/22/1118843708/a-look-at-quiet-quitting-and-whether-its-a-good-or-bad-thing
Krajčík, M., Schmidt, D. A., & Baráth, M. (2023). Hybrid work model: An approach to work-life flexibility in a changing environment. Administrative Sciences, 13(6), Article 150. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13060150
Lambert, S. D., & Loiselle, C. G. (2008). Combining individual interviews and focus groups to enhance data richness. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(2), 228-237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04559.x
Lange, M., & Kayser, I. (2022). The role of self-efficacy, work-related autonomy and work-family conflict on employee’s stress level during home-based remote work in Germany. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), Article 4955. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19094955
Majerova, J., Gajanova, L., Nadanyiova, M., & Derecskei, A. K. (2021). Intrinsic motivation sources as pillars of sustainable internal marketing communication in turbulent post-pandemic times. Sustainability, 13(16), Article 8799. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168799
Makki, A., & Abid, M. (2017). Influence of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on employee’s task performance. Studies in Asian Social Science, 4(1), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.5430/sass.v4n1p38
Malhotra, N., & Reay, T. (2019). Hybridity and power in the microfoundations of professional work. In Microfoundations of institutions (vol. 65B, pp. 241-255). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X2019000065B017
Malviya, L., & Gupta, V. (2022). Empathy, autonomy, and trust critical for organizational culture in a hybrid workplace. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2022(1), Article 11284. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2022.11284abstract
Manpower Vietnam. (2022). Recruitment Trends Survey for Q1 and Q2, 2022 [In Vietnamese]. Retrieved January 15, 2025, from https://www.manpower.com.vn/vi/insights/blogs/2023/10/khao-sat-xu-huong-tuyen-dung-quy-1-va-quy-2-2022
Mansyur, E., Salim, M., Abdillah, W., & Praningrum. (2024). Motivation as a key driver for performance improvement among health promotion staff at Jalan Gedang Health Centre, Bengkulu City. International Journal on Economics, Finance and Sustainable Development, 6(11), 267-273. https://doi.org/10.31149/ijefsd.v6i11.5326
Molzahn, A. E., Starzomski, R., McDonald, M., & O’Loughlin, C. (2005). Chinese Canadian beliefs toward organ donation. Qualitative Health Research, 15(1), 82-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732304270653
Morgan, D. L. (1996). Focus groups. Annual Review of Rociology, 22(1), 129-152.
Mowat, H. (2022). Interviews and observation. In The Wiley Blackwell companion to theology and qualitative research (pp. 382-392). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119756927.ch37
Ng, B. (2018). The neuroscience of growth mindset and intrinsic motivation. Brain Sciences, 8(2), Article 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8020020
Nguyen, H. T., & Vu, M. H. (2025). Quiet quitting: Insights from generation Z workers in Vietnam. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM), 13(1), 8267-8282.
Nguyen, T. V., Watanabe, T., & Nguyen, H. L. (2022). Importance of autonomous motivation in construction labor productivity improvement in Vietnam: A self-determination theory perspective. Buildings, 12(6), Article 763. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12060763
Osborne, N., & Grant-Smith, D. (2021). In-depth interviewing. In Methods in urban analysis (pp. 105-125). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1677-8_7
Pawirosumarto, S., Sarjana, P. K., & Gunawan, R. (2017). The effect of work environment, leadership style, and organizational culture towards job satisfaction and its implication towards employee performance in Parador Hotels and Resorts, Indonesia. International Journal of Law and Management, 59(6), 1337-1358. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-10-2016-0085
Petrova, M., Koval, V., Tepavicharova, M., Zerkal, A., Radchenko, A., & Bondarchuk, N. (2020). The interaction between the human resources motivation and the commitment to the organization. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 9(3), 897-907. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2020.9.3(15)
Pronin, V. Y., & Krivopuskov, V. V. (2022). Psychological needs and motivation of remote workers: sociological viewpoint. Digital Sociology, 5(4), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-347x-2022-5-4-15-22
Radko, E. D. (2024). “Quiet quitting” as a new trend in the labor market. Novosibirsk State University Press, 24(1), 5-15. https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2024-24-1-5-15
Rees, C. E., Ford, J. E., & Sheard, C. E. (2003). Patient information leaflets for prostate cancer: Which leaflets should healthcare professionals recommend? Patient Education and Counseling, 49(3), 263-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00188-X
Rodríguez-Montoya, C., De Castro Morel, R., & Frías-Rodríguez, D. (2024). Quiet quitting in the Dominican Republic: The employers’ perspective. Management Research, 22(4), 185-202. https://doi.org/10.1108/mrjiam-12-2023-1488
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Saritha, T., & Akthar, P. (2024). The impact of hybrid work models on employee well-being and engagement. Deleted Journal, 31(5s), 97-104. https://doi.org/10.52783/cana.v31.1003
Scheyett, A. (2023). Quiet quitting. Social Work, 68(1), 5-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swac051
Serenko, A. (2024). The human capital management perspective on quiet quitting: Recommendations for employees, managers, and national policymakers. Journal of Knowledge Management, 28(1), 27-43. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2022-0792
Suazo, M. M. (2009). The mediating role of psychological contract violation on the relations between psychological contract breach and work‐related attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(2), 136-160.
Supriyono, S., & Susmonowati, T. (2022). The role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to maintain employee performance productivity during Work From Home (WFH): A case study of a private university in Jakarta. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 27, 606-619.
Talukder, M. F., & Prieto, L. (2024). A “quiet quitting” scale: development and validation. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 33(6), 1487-1510. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-01-2024-4182
Taylor, B. (2005). The experiences of overseas nurses working in the NHS: Results of a qualitative study. Diversity and Equality in Health and Care, 2(1), 17-27.
Van den Broeck, A., Ferris, D., Chang, C., & Rosen, C. (2016). A review of self-determination theorys basic psychological needs at work. Journal of Management, 42(1), 163-181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316632058
Vicary, S., Young, A., & Hicks, S. (2017). A reflective journal as learning process and contribution to quality and validity in interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative Social Work, 16(4), 550-565. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325016635244
Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qian, J., & Parker, S. K. (2021). Achieving effective remote working during the Covid‐19 pandemic: A work design perspective. Applied Psychology, 70(1), 16-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12290
Woodworth, R. S. (1918). Dynamic psychology. Columbia University Press.
Xueyun, Z., Al Mamun, A., Masukujjaman, M., Rahman, M. K., Gao, J., & Yang, Q. (2023). Modelling the significance of organizational conditions on quiet quitting intention among Gen Z workforce in an emerging economy. Scientific Reports, 13(1), Article 15438. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42591-3
Yoo, S. J., Han, S. H., & Huang, W. (2012). The roles of intrinsic motivators and extrinsic motivators in promoting e-learning in the workplace: A case from South Korea. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 942-950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.015
Downloads
Received: 27-03-2025Accepted: 01-07-2025Published: 07-09-2025Statistics Views
Abstract: 2894 PDF: 421How to Cite
Nguyen, Q. A., Nguyen, H. P., Huynh, T. H., Luong, B. A., Nguyen, T. H. G., & Luong, T. M. D. (2025). Quiet quitting in the era of hybrid work: A qualitative study on work motivation among generation Z. HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, 16(4), 98–113. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.en.16.4.4262.2026License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nguyen Quang Anh; Nguyen Hoang Phuc; Huynh Trong Hien; Luong Bich An; Nguyen Thi Huong Giang; Luong Thi My Duyen

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
For authors
Other
Indexing By
- Nguyen Hoang Phuc phucnguyen.31221023675@st.ueh.edu.vn
