Geopolitical Risk and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) practices of listed companies in Vietnam

Authors

  • Nghia Nguyen Trinh
    Kalamazoo College, Michigan, United States
  • Nghia Dang Nguyen
    Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HCMUT), Ho Chi Minh City Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam

DOI:

10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.en.15.5.3839.2025

Keywords:

corporate governance; emerging markets; ESG; geopolitical risk; sustainability

JEL Classification:

G30; G34; G39

Abstract

The intensifying geopolitical risk (GPR) across major countries has raised concerns about how firms can navigate the uncertainties that arise from it. This paper is the first effort to provide evidence that companies in Vietnam engage in Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) practices to mitigate GPR. Utilizing a unique dataset of ESG performance of publicly listed companies on the Vietnam stock markets from 2018 to 2023, the study demonstrates that increasing levels of GPR, both globally and in eight major economies, lead to heightened ESG activities among firms. Specifically, the result shows that a one-unit increase in GPR is associated with an increase in ESG by 4,895 units. While GPR significantly influences environmental and social initiatives, governance activities show insignificant influence. Moreover, firms categorized as high-risk exhibit a more pronounced increase in ESG efforts in response to GPR compared to their low-risk counterparts, suggesting that these companies strategically use ESG to manage GPR. This study offers crucial insights for firms in Vietnam, highlighting the benefits of adopting ESG practices to safeguard against potential shocks stemming from geopolitical instability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdulla, M., Tiwari, A. K., Hossain, M. R., & Abakah, E. J. A. (2024). Geopolitical risk and firm-level Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance. Journal of Environmental Management, 363, Article 121245.

Afesorgbor, S. K. (2019). The impact of economic sanctions on international trade: How do threatened sanctions compare with imposed sanctions? European Journal of Political Economy, 56, 11-26.

Alnafrah, I. (2024). ESG practices mitigating geopolitical risks: Implications for sustainable environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 358, Article 120923.

Bednarski, L., Roscoe, S., Blome, C., & Schleper, M. C. (2024). Geopolitical disruptions in global supply chains: A state-of-the-art literature review. Production Planning & Control36(4), 536-562.

Bhagat, S., & Black, B. (1999). The uncertain relationship between board composition and firm performance. The Business Lawyer, 54(3), 921-963.

Downloads

Received: 08-11-2024
Accepted: 24-02-2025
Published: 14-06-2025

Statistics Views

Abstract: 983
PDF: 526

How to Cite

Trinh, N. N., & Nguyen, N. D. (2025). Geopolitical Risk and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) practices of listed companies in Vietnam. HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, 15(5), 150–168. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.en.15.5.3839.2025